A HOSPITAL surgeon who turned whistle-blower to reveal that patients' lives were being put at risk by staff shortages is to face disciplinary action.
Milton Pena leaked a dossier of shame showing that vulnerable elderly and critically-ill patients at Tameside Hospital were left unattended for hours because there was not enough staff to look after them.
A nursing log for three wards revealed how patients sometimes had to wait all night for their basic needs - including food, toiletry help, medication and pulse checks.
Hospital bosses have now begun formal disciplinary proceedings against Mr Pena, 56, an orthopaedic specialist who has worked at Tameside for eight years.
He could be sacked, suspended or forced to retrain if found guilty. They do not deny the problems Mr Pena raised, but say he broke Tameside NHS Trust's whistle-blowing policy by talking to the press.
A gagging memo was also sent to staff threatening them with disciplinary action if they 'unreasonably' undermine public confidence in the hospital by going to the press. But Mr Pena has vowed to fight to keep his job and for extra staff.
He said: "The trust has decided that they have enough grounds to begin disciplinary proceedings against me. They told me it was because I went public. But I only did that because I've been raising this issue with them since July 2002 and nothing has been done."
In 2003 Mr Pena had alerted the hospital chief executive and the Healthcare Commission to more than 14 instances when only one qualified member of staff was on duty to cover 28 patients.
But he says nothing was done by the hospital, which has the second highest mortality rate in the country and the lowest doctor-and-nurse-to-bed ratio in Greater Manchester.
A spokesman for the trust declined to comment on the disciplinary proceedings, but said: "We accept that he has legitimate concerns that the trust are responding to. We are meeting with the management team on Wednesday (yesterday) to talk about these concerns."

Showing comments 1 to 4 and replies | View All
Chris W, Stalybridge (09/06/2005 at 10:32)
The Chief Executive will no doubt quote this set of audit figures or that ..hospital executives have learned to massage the data as skillfully as their counterparts in industry.
Services are inevitably centralised in the modern NHS and people have to travel to access them either by private transport or the ambulance services..everyone recognises this todayb&it serves to give patients access to the best professional expertise that is available in the region.It happens already in Tameside or if not, then it certainly should.
What is the recruitment situation in Tameside Secondary Care?b&..the better people ,be they doctors or nurses, DON'T want to work at Tameside General hospitalb&.it has a bad reputation and they don't want Tameside on their CVs.
Tameside Acute NHS Trust is now a isolated outpost of mediocre medical and surgical practice in Greater Manchester.it should be amalgamated into a super-trust as soon as possible.The Central Manchester Teaching Hospitals Trust ( Manchester Royal Infirmary) is the ideal candidate though I have no doubt that they would need considerable financial help to take over and raise standards in Tameside Acute NHS Trust.
Complacency on the part of the three Tameside MPs cannot go onb&.they should talk confidentially to medical and nursing professionals in both primary and secondary care in Tameside and other trusts nearby such as Oldham Royal.They should ask for confidential appraisals from the Professorial Departments for Anaesthetics ,Surgery and Medecine at Manchester University to see whether they are happy to include Tameside General in the training rotations for the Specialist Registrars.My guess is that there is current and longstanding profound disquiet about this Trust amongst those who set the professional medical and nursing standards for the North West Region.
One day this situation is going to blow up in the faces of the local politicos,Councillors and MPs, and once more Tameside will be embroiled in a medical scandal just as profound as Dr Fred Shipman's activities" carried on even when he was chairman of the local Family Practitioner Committee responsible for disciplining other local GPs!
There is an active information grapevine in the medical and allied professions that carries details of practitoners' reputations that would never go down on paper.This means that many areas recognised to maintain high standards will not employ individuals that are considered suspect.They can pick and choose.Other less fortunate areas often do not enjoy that privilege and have to take whomsoever they can get.Such areas become refuges for the incompetent and the uncaring.One hopes that Tameside has not become just such an area.Do we know?
I ask the question again b&..how many of the local General Practitioners would choose to have major surgery performed on them or theirs in Tameside General? ..would they be confident in the quality of anesthetic care the would receive?Given the choice, how many of the GPs would ask their own GP to refer them to a hospital or consultant outside the area?
How many of the wealthier residents in Tameside take comfort from their private health insurance that insulates them from the ministrations of Tameside Acute NHS Trust?
The people of Tameside deserve better not just from the healthcare services of the Tameside area but from their elected political leaders also.Second or third best is just not good enough!
judith evans, ontario (09/06/2005 at 13:13)
Cath, England (07/10/2006 at 21:19)
Peter English, Surrey (09/10/2006 at 11:34)
That said, there's a lot of heavy-handed bullying about from managers in the health sector IME.