EXCLUSIVE
THE sale of over 1,000 Council houses on eight estates across the borough to a Moss Side landlord has sparked fears Stockport could be opening the floodgates to a culture of guns and gangs.
The 1,150 homes, which are on overspill estates in Bredbury, Marple, Bramhall, Cheadle, Romiley and Heald Green, are owned by Manchester City Council. It plans to sell them for £1m to social landlord Mosscare, responsible for housing in Moss Side - an area renowned for its gun culture and problems with gangs.
The move has sparked fears among members of the Stockport residents' steering group that people involved in crime in the Moss Side area could end up in Stockport's leafy suburbs like Bramhall and Marple, either by their own choice or as part of an attempt by the landlord to disperse problem tenants.
Their view is disputed, however, by the City Council which insists such fears are "totally groundless".
Bill Cawley, the former chairman of the residents' steering group and the East Manchester Union, and a resident on the Bredbury Green Estate said: "This is a real worry. I see the gun and drug crime in Moss Side and it could come to these estates.
"The way the list operates is that if a person from Moss Side is top of it they can choose to move wherever they want, as can somebody from Stockport."
His concerns were echoed by leading former Bramhall councillor Tony Johnson who said: "From what I understand, I believe it is likely to work out at 50 per cent of people living in Stockport and 50 per cent of people from outside the borough could apply for housing."
Coun Johnson added: "There are about 100 council tenants living in Bramhall who are likely to be transferred to the new company. The concern here is that over a period of many years Manchester has sometimes got rid of its problem tenants in this borough and elsewhere. It's necessary to ensure it doesn't happen again, in my opinion, by ringfencing these houses for the people of Stockport."
The manner in which Mosscare was chosen, has left some residents deeply sceptical about Manchester's intentions towards its Stockport tenants.
Mr Cawley claims that when the sale process was set up last autumn Mosscare was not even on the list of landlords agreed by his group.
He added: "I was told we could choose the social landlord, but when we produced a shortlist of four firms, Mosscare and Willow Park were added by Manchester City Council at the 11th hour."
Manchester City Council's executive member for neighbourhood services, Councillor Eddy Newman, said: "These fears are totally groundless. Mosscare is a reputable registered social landlord with an excellent track record of managing stock transfer estates.
"They have made significant investment to improve the quality of life of residents across these estates. In Stockport Mosscare has been working well with the steering group and consultation with Stockport residents has been very positive.
"Mosscare will work closely with other local Stockport housing providers to make sure homes are let fairly, giving access to local people. Existing tenants can remain in their own homes and those who want to move will be offered transfers to the areas where they want to live and where there are vacancies."
Coun Dave Goddard, the leader of Stockport Council, said the Council had already started work with Mosscare, and if the vote by residents in summer was successful, it would be welcomed as a full member of the Stockport Housing Partnership.
He added: "Stockport Council believes everyone should live in decent quality housing that is well maintained and properly managed."
A meeting to discuss the transfer with residents will be held on Wednesday, June 27, at the Highgate Centre, Bents Lane, Bredbury, starting at 7 pm.

Showing comments 1 to 23 and replies | View All
Mary, stockport (13/06/2007 at 12:01)
gina, stockport (13/06/2007 at 12:40)
ann millward, reddish (13/06/2007 at 12:49)
Ben, Romiley (13/06/2007 at 14:23)
This is another scandal and Stockport Council stands by and lets it happen when Stockport Homes could have stepped in and taken over.
minnie, manchester (13/06/2007 at 20:51)
who decided that this landlord should be the only one that the Stockport tenants could choose from?
P Smith, Bredbury (13/06/2007 at 22:51)
butch, romiley (14/06/2007 at 10:13)
butch, romiley (14/06/2007 at 10:16)
we would not have a problem about them moving to reddish or brinnington as these areas are awful anyway !
keep them out of beautiful leafy marple and bramhall !
Liz, South Reddish (14/06/2007 at 15:15)
We are the taxpayers and anything and everything that is paid for by the Council Tax.
I recently sent for housing association application form. If I was from another country or just out of prison I would automatically receive 5000 points and go straight to the top of the list. As it happens my circumstances award me 45 points. I've worked for 20 years, paid my tax and never been in trouble. Who said crime doesn't pay?
I recently read that the latest thing the police are doing with our tax money is sending criminals birthday cards with a naff poem about changing their ways and crossing them off their lists.
What is this country coming to?
There is nothing here for the law abiding tax paying British born citizen anymore.
Stockport has enough problems without inviting anymore.
Keep Manchester in Manchester and leave Stockport as Stockport - stop trying to integrate the two, it won't work.
Liz, South Reddish (14/06/2007 at 15:26)
tony, bramhall (14/06/2007 at 21:50)
If we want to keep people out who have association with drugs , gangs, firearms prostitution and other serious criminal offences.
If we don`t want our children to be bullied at school by children from violent and disfunctional families.
If we dont want our children forced to become drug addicts.
We need to apply the strongest pressure possible to local coucillors and make the persons responsible for these decisions accountable.
They are controlling matters which affect our quality of life and the value of our homes.
They should be making the improvements to our communities that they are paid to do. Not ruining them.
The police can not deal with the currents demands placed upon them.
Stockport already loses out in government funding because it is not recognised as a deprived area. So we do not need any more problems for our underfunded overstretched services to deal with.
Steve, Marple (15/06/2007 at 10:16)
Realist, Stockport (15/06/2007 at 23:47)
It concerns housing that is currently owned by Manchester City Council - nowt to do with Stockport Council, other than the tenants pay Council Tax to Stockport. At the moment anyone from Manchester can acquire one of these tenancies.
The aim of moving over to Moss Care is to bring the housing up to the "Decent Homes" standard. Quite right to! Stockport Council currently has about 4 out of 10 of its homes below this standard and is to spend £100 million over the next four years to bring its 11,000 houses up to the standard. Manchester is to do exactly the same!
The houses are to be transferred over to Moss Care, subject to a tenant's ballot. %0% of new tenancies will be for Stockport residents and 50% for Manchester.
It is absolutely insulting to Moss Care to talk about guns and other similar issues - it happens in Stockport already. Mr Cawley (or the reporter) should be ashamed of such alarmist, untrue headlines, and ill-informed comments and story.
I suppose there is little hope of an apology and correction?
Ben, Romiley (18/06/2007 at 10:27)
Adam, Moss Nook (18/06/2007 at 16:21)
I have lived all over South Manchester and Stockport and would much rather be in Wythenshawe or Moss Side, where people base there opions on what they know rather than what they assume.
Ray, Romily (18/06/2007 at 18:57)
Ray, Romily (18/06/2007 at 19:05)
Mark, Stockport (18/06/2007 at 19:09)
Realist, Stockport (19/06/2007 at 00:02)
Think before you reply. You are just as bad as the article. You have based your comments without considering the facts, only on ignorant prejudices!
mary, stockport (20/06/2007 at 12:11)
Ben, Romiley (20/06/2007 at 16:16)
Manchester, for its part, should hang its head in shame at its lack of investment on these overspill estates, which has brought its residents in Stockport to this impasse.
Suzanne, Stockport (21/06/2007 at 12:19)
stuart meno (04/06/2008 at 10:07)