A MAN who held a three-year vigil outside the town hall has been cleared of assaulting a security guard after claims he sneezed on him.
Michael Parnell became a familiar face outside the town hall over three years, at one point standing on the steps 24 hours a day.
The father-of-two held signs bearing simple messages such as ‘Hello’ in a bid to raise awareness of a long-standing grievance with social services.
Gradually relations between Mr Parnell and security staff deteriorated and last summer he was convicted of deliberately blowing mucus onto one of them.
Mr Parnell, 54, of Osborne Street, Bredbury, has now been cleared on appeal but was warned to stay away from the council.
Judge Bernard Lever expressed sympathy with Mr Parnell’s original cause, but said: "Unfortunately all these years of standing outside protesting has not borne fruit and this is, over time, going to lead to a feeling of frustration on the appellant’s part. We are sure, whether his intention or not, this appellant was very frustrated in the first instance with the council and in the second instance with the security guards employed by the council.
"He was spoiling for a conflict."
However, Judge Lever said there was not enough evidence to uphold the conviction.
The court heard Mr Parnell had been protesting outside the main council offices in October 2008 when he tried to force open the automatic doors.
Security guard Francis Craughwell claimed that when he confronted Mr Parnell, he had blown mucus at him, saying: ‘Here, share my cold.’
His colleague Steve Duggen, a senior council security guard, said he had witnessed the assault.
But the court heard that when police were called, there was no evidence of any mucus on Mr Craughwell’s jacket, and the incident had not been captured on CCTV.
Mr Parnell was cleared of common assault but banned from going within one mile of council offices for 18 months.

Showing comments 1 to 4 and replies | View All
Sheila Oliver (20/01/2010 at 18:49)
How much has this lunatic case cost the taxpayer? I am taking this issue to the National Audit Office and intend to find out.
Why did Stockport Council involve the police a hundred times? Why didn't they simply sort out his problem - it doesn't seem too difficult and he was trying for over a decade to get help. The Coroner is currently looking at the actions of Stockport Council regarding the young girl just out of council care who jumped to her death from a tower block and there is the tragic case of the lady from Stockport who jumped off the Humber Bridge with her 9 year old autistic son. Stockport Council is obviously failing the people who come to them for help? Why? The Director the Children and Young People's Directorate, Andrew Webb, serves on several important Government think tanks, but there would appear to be terrible failings in the department he oversees. Maybe he should spend more of his working time actually in Stockport and not at career-enhancing meetings with the Government. We pay his very large salary, after all.
Greater Manchester Police are currently under investigation by the Home Office for their poor performance, so why did senior council officers at Stockport paid up to £150,000 pa and LibDem Executive councillors allow this abuse of police time to continue? Questions need asking and I am going to ask them.
Charlotte Peters Rock, Knutsford (20/01/2010 at 22:40)
He should have the right of peaceful protest, when so many wrongs have been done to his family by the actions of Stockport MBC employees, including those at the highest level.
Mr Parnell is a peaceful protestor. He is pleasant, polite and patient. He is not a tourist, nor an illegal immigrant but a resident of Stockport; a borough which should hang its head in shame - assuming it knows what shame is.
Mr Parnell is one of many dissatisfied parents, who live in Stockport.
I. Gillan, Tameside (21/01/2010 at 00:56)
zarquon, bramhall (25/01/2010 at 14:26)