THE battle for our tap water is looming. New figures show south Manchester has one of the country's worst records for tooth decay, leading to fresh calls for fluoride to be added to water supplies.
Supporters of fluoridation say that areas where it has been introduced have seen massive improvements in dental health - particularly for children.
But opponents have likened the process to mass-medication and say not enough is known of the health risks.
The debate over fluoride has been reopened after the government recently gave health authorities new powers to add fluoride to tap water.
And with dental health in the North West among the worst in the country, many observers believe that Greater Manchester could be the first place to introduce fluoride since the new legislation was introduced.
Water companies in the region have already been asked to look into the costs.
And if NHS primary care trusts agree to the price, a consultation into fluoridation could begin next year and fluoride added to tap water as soon as 2008.
Ian Rhodes, spokesman for NHS North West - formerly the Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority - said: "There's been a lot of support for fluoridation for many years in the North West because if you look at comparable areas, like Sandwell in Birmingham which already has fluoridation, there's five-times less tooth decay in children because they have had fluoridated water for many years.
"There are no proven health risks."
In a league table of the 311 health authorities in Britain, Central Manchester NHS Primary Care Trust, which oversees practices in parts of Fallowfield and Chorlton, as well as Whalley Range and Levenshulme, was ranked the 13th worst for dental health.
And South Manchester PCT, which covers Fallowfield, Withington, Didsbury, Chorlton Park, Burnage and Northenden, was 59th worst.
In these areas, the average five-year-old child has between two and three fillings or missing teeth.
In the South Manchester PCT area, less than 50 per cent of five-year-olds are free of any tooth decay and this figure falls to around a third in the central Manchester area.
The local situation compares starkly to Sandwell in the West Midlands, where water was fluoridated in the 1980s.
From having one of the worst records for childhood decay in 1985, Sandwell now has one of the best, with five-year-olds having an average of one decayed tooth.
However, opponents of fluoridation remain as vociferous as ever. Cancer, osteoporosis and even low childhood IQ have all been attributed to the process, although no conclusive evidence is available.
Withington MP John Leech said that, after weighing-up both sides of the argument, he is throwing his weight behind fluoridation.
He added: "I support adding fluoride but I also accept that a lot of people are against the idea.
"I think it is a good idea for the health of teeth and, certainly, when I speak to dentists they tell me that they are in favour of it.
"There needs to extensive consultation before it is introduced to water supplies.
"Manchester has a poor health record and I am sure that fluoride could help to address the dental side of things."

Showing comments 1 to 5 and replies | View All
Robert Pocock, Dublin (21/07/2006 at 11:37)
In Ireland which has been compulsorily fluoridated since the 1960s, four out of ten of our teenagers now have fluoride poisoning in the form of dental fluorosis; this has increased eightfold since 1984 when only 5% were affected. Please check www.idof.net to find out the many reasons why more and more Irish dentists are now against this practice.
Alastair Carnegie, Colne Lancashire (21/07/2006 at 13:20)
Professor Sheldon in his third bullet point clearly stated that the NHS review, quote; "did not show water fluoridation to be safe" We do know fluoride delays the eruption of deciduous teeth by up to two years, might this in fact account for the higher fillings in unfluoridated areas, Those sticky sweets(the real cause) have had longer to rot the teeth. All fluoride may do is delay a filling not prevent one. It's action is said to be 'topical' not systemic, why drink sun-block? So Why is a non-science educated M.P. Lib Dem John Leech not consulting with the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination? He has a slim majority. He should take care he does not lose his seat!
A.Wills, West London (22/07/2006 at 11:33)
He also taught them to clean their teeth correctly. Teeth need a healthy diet & calcium, magnesium & vitamin D. This helps general health too & is much better than adding a toxic chemical.
Water fluoridation is wasteful & expensive as most water is used for washing, toilet flushing & by industry. Forcing everyone to drink a medication via the water supply goes against all medical ethics.
George Glasser, Staley Bridge (27/07/2006 at 10:51)
Hundreds of nurses are being laid-off. Milk for tea and coffee has been cut to save ??44k per year. However, the SHA is going to find ??50m to fluoridate.
Presently, if the Greater Manchester SHA decides to fluoridate (which they will) - The Health Authorities are going to have to 'rob Peter to pay Paul'. This inevitably means cutting out many prescriptions for life-saving drugs and reducing the availability of treatments and operations or even essential services. And this is all for a non-life threatening condition that could be easily remedied by educating people about dental hygiene - which would cost very little.
Even if the Department of Health supplies grants to pay "up to 60%" of fluoridation start-up, the money is still coming out of the Department of Health budget, so it will be the NHS dependent people who are in dire need of life-saving treatments that pay the ultimate price for a possible reduction in Tooth Decay.
It could be you or a loved-one who is refused life-saving treatment because parents are too ignorant and lazy to make their children brush their teeth.
George Glasser
David, Prestwich (17/08/2006 at 21:38)