United have never done so with the backing of a rich benefactor throwing money at them. They have done so through hard work throughout the years. Note: We nearly folded as a club 3 times, in '58 ten years later we won the big one. United are what they are because of the fanbase and money made on the name of the club. City are where they are because they are 1 mans plaything.
United are still competing now despite an owner who is harmful to the club.
You cannot say United did what City are doing. United spent money, United had earned. City are spending money their owner has earned through his birth right into a family sitting on a lake of oil!
"How boring it is to see 1 team always win it". We had to live with Liverpool for 26 years and we managed to break that without a sugar daddy. Why should other teams be able to just come in and lazily do it without the hard work that United had to put in over 26 years to get to where they are now.
United are still competing now despite an owner who is harmful to the club.
You cannot say United did what City are doing. United spent money, United had earned. City are spending money their owner has earned through his birth right into a family sitting on a lake of oil!
"How boring it is to see 1 team always win it". We had to live with Liverpool for 26 years and we managed to break that without a sugar daddy. Why should other teams be able to just come in and lazily do it without the hard work that United had to put in over 26 years to get to where they are now.