Give it a rest, lad.
There's banter and there's "for the sake of it", and a lot of articles on this site are just flooded with the latter. It's becoming tiresome and tedious.
I'm sure most sound-minded reds would argue the case for Richards to be included over Kelly too.
There's banter and there's "for the sake of it", and a lot of articles on this site are just flooded with the latter. It's becoming tiresome and tedious.
I'm sure most sound-minded reds would argue the case for Richards to be included over Kelly too.