A VANDAL with a grudge against speed cameras has struck again in their costly one-man war.
Officers are determined to catch what is believed to be a single motorist seeking revenge after being convicted by evidence from the speed traps.
The latest target was a camera in Featherstall Road, which has been repeatedly vandalised over the past six months.
The camera was installed because of nine crashes in which two people were seriously injured, one of them a child, in the last three years.
In the attack at the weekend, silver paint was sprayed across the lens so it can no longer take pictures, and the word 'dummy' scrawled on the casing. It also appeared to have been peppered with an air rifle.
The cameras are owned and operated by Drivesafe, which spends '250,000 on installing and maintaining them every year.
Spokesman Claire Wightman said: 'The police are made aware of every act of vandalism on every speed camera. They warn that criminal damage, especially when it endangers the lives of innocent members of the public, is punishable by imprisonment.'
The Advertiser revealed last month how the camera, and one in Manchester Road, are being systematically vandalised ' apparently by the same person.
As soon as engineers repair the speed traps, the mystery attacker strikes again. Each time the same method of attack is used, spraying silver paint across the lens so it cannot catch drivers breaking the 30mph limit.
Anyone photographed driving too fast is hit with a fine of at least '60 and has three points on their license. More points and a bigger fine is imposed if the limit is broken by more than 25mph.
Each camera costs '20,000 and each one in Greater Manchester caught an average of 207 speeding drivers last year.

Showing 1 to 25 of 48 comments | View All
Neil McDonald, Stockport, Manchester (17/05/2005 at 23:23)
Big brother is watching us... but now big brother has someone watching him. Good for you, I would do the same if I had the guts. Vandalism? Speed cameras ARE vandalism as they deface our roads.
jon, brighton (18/05/2005 at 08:30)
if there were more traffic police then we wouldnt need these
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (18/05/2005 at 10:44)
Joseph McGarraghy, Prestwich (18/05/2005 at 13:47)
t patterson, manchester (18/05/2005 at 16:48)
John, Oldham (18/05/2005 at 17:22)
pete, tameside (19/05/2005 at 06:38)
These 'big brother' devices are nothing more than money making schemes.
More police not more cameras.
I wish that I had the guts to do it.
Jon M, Hattersley, Hyde (19/05/2005 at 09:15)
cw, manchester (19/05/2005 at 11:14)
Paul, Cheshire (19/05/2005 at 14:46)
Neil McDonald, Stockport, Manchester (19/05/2005 at 15:30)
Another point: This is petty vandalism (whether I agree with it or not). When was the last time you read about a bus shelter being smashed? It is the same sort of vandalism, so why aren't those cases highlighted in newspapers?
Paul Grath, Salford (20/05/2005 at 18:01)
If your child was run over by a speeding car i am sure you would not be complaining.
Andy, Manchester (20/05/2005 at 18:56)
Ian, Stalybridge (20/05/2005 at 19:04)
John, Mosside (23/05/2005 at 00:13)
Andy L., Mancheter (26/05/2005 at 13:09)
Ted, Oldham (27/05/2005 at 14:40)
tom, Manchester, UK (27/05/2005 at 15:37)
For those who doubt the above, google for 'regression to the mean'
More traffic police, and no cameras!
Ted, Oldham (27/05/2005 at 16:04)
ANNOYED, Swinton, Gtr. Manchester (27/05/2005 at 19:01)
Earlybird, Roosting (31/05/2005 at 04:35)
Paul, Merseyside (01/06/2005 at 09:47)
Magic, ALTRINCHAM (02/06/2005 at 20:57)
Hope this motorist does not get caught
Great public service
Keep up the good work
Bill, Oldham (04/06/2005 at 11:29)
John, Mosside (05/06/2005 at 19:56)