IN soccer, just as in life, looking back can sometimes be a pointless exercise,
writes PAUL HINCE.
And so it is with Euro 2004. What's done is done and all the looking back, all the finger-pointing in the world, isn't going to alter the fact that England are out.
So let's look forward instead, because it may have escaped your attention - if you're still preoccupied with Thursday night in Lisbon - that England's opening qualifying matches for the 2006 World Cup in Germany are hovering just over the horizon.
Two years. Just you watch, that time will fly by. The World Cup finals of 2006 will be with us before we realise it.
But that's all the time available to Sven-Goran Eriksson to first assemble an England side good enough to book their passage to Germany and, secondly, to make a more lasting impression in the finals in 2006 than they did in Portugal in 2004.
The first question which needs answering is the obvious one. With an eye on the coming World Cup, should Eriksson stand by his preferred first-choice team which was on duty in Euro 2004 in the belief that, in two years, it will be at its peak?
The answer to that question, to my mind, is a resounding No!
The current England team, in my opinion, is at its peak right now. The vast majority of the side which Eriksson fielded in Portugal were seasoned internationals. Yet they failed to progress beyond the quarter-final stage.
The logic in suggesting that they will be a more efficient unit in Germany when they will all be two years older totally escapes me.
So should Eriksson return to the drawing board and start afresh? Of course not. That would be throwing the baby out with the bath-water.
But what should be blindingly obvious is that new faces and new ideas are going to be needed if England are to succeed in Germany where they failed in Portugal.
Berth
Let's start at square one and look at England's goalkeeping position. Did David James perform well enough during the European Championships to retain his international berth for the foreseeable future? I would suggest not.
James's decision making still leaves a lot to be desired, and it's unlikely that, at his age, he is going to be able to iron that deficiency out of his game.
Eriksson has two excellent young keepers in Chris Kirkland and Paul Robinson chomping on the bit to prove themselves at international level.
Despite his injury problems, Liverpool's Kirkland, in my book, just has the edge over Robinson and should replace James in the England team at the earliest opportunity to prepare him for the coming World Cup challenge.
If the European Championships in Portugal is the yard-stick to judge by, Eriksson has no need to turn into the Tinkerman as far as his back four are concerned as he plots his World Cup campaign.
Gary Neville, John Terry, Sol Campbell and Ashley Cole were collectively as solid as a rock throughout 2004, although work needs to be done on set pieces. But there is no reason to suggest that they will any different as a unit in Germany in two years time.
Yet even England's most efficicent department can be improved by recalling Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand after his suspension, to bring the calmness and the authority alongside Campbell which Terry sometimes lacks under pressure.
Matches, more often than not, are won and lost in midfield, and this is the area which will be giving Eriksson the biggest cause for concern when he conducts his inquest into Euro 2004.
David Beckham, it has to be said, had a disastrous campaign in Portugal, to raise serious doubts about his merits as England's skipper and his very international career.
Beckham has said consistently that his very public life will not impinge on his soccer, but that statement has a hollow ring now after his anonyomous displays in Portugal.
Circus
The Beckham publicity circus won't be leaving town, that's for sure. There are too many mouths to feed off Beckham's fame.
And, despite Beckham's pledge yesterday (Friday) to stay on as skipper, perhaps now is the time for Eriksson to tell the Real Madrid man that no one can serve two masters, because soccer no longer appears to be the motivating factor in Beckham's life.
Personally, I believe that Beckham has run his race at international level. He is neither the player nor the inspirational leader he was two years ago.
Eriksson should grasp the nettle and draft in little Shaun Wright-Phillips to fill Beckham's position on the right-side of England's midfield.
The Manchester City favourite may not be quite ready yet to step up to that level. But he's got an engine every bit as big as Beckham's, and one other asset which Beckham sorely lacks - Wright-Phillips can take on and beat an opponent.
One thing I can add with absolute conviction. If Wright-Phillips improves as much over the next two years as he has over the last two years, Eriksson will have a genuine international match-winner at his disposal for the 2006 World Cup finals.
With Steven Gerrard and Frank Lampard certain to be part of Eriksson's World Cup campaign, the other difficult decision he needs to make concerning his midfield department is whether to keep faith with Paul Scholes for the next two years.
The ability of the Manchester United star is not in question. But what can be questioned is Scholes's effectiveness these days when wearing the England shirt. One goal in three years is a poor return by anyone's standards - and an horrific one when applied to a player whose very reputation has been built around his goalscoring talents.
Wayne Rooney's amazing rise to senior international level, and the position he occupies in the hole behind the main striker, has restricted Scholes's famous forward surges still further.
And while the Ginger Prince will clearly be part of Eriksson's squad in the World Cup campaign, I can see him being used in future more as a substitute than an automatic choice in Eriksson's starting line-up.
Incredible
It goes without saying that the incredible Rooney will be the main weapon in Eriksson's armoury during the World Cup campaign.
In fact, the mind boggles at the thought of what wonderkid Wayne will be like as a player with two more years of experience under his talented belt.
Michael Owen won't lose his penalty box expertise between now and 2006. He seems to have been part of the international scene for such a long time that it's hard to believe he's still only 24.
And in one flash against Portugal he proved that he's still one of the most natural finishers in world soccer.
But what Owen and Rooney desperately need is a good, old-fashioned English centre-forward to lead the front-line and create the space which is manna from heaven for the two Merseyside idols. What would Eriksson give right now, I wonder, to have a 25-year-old Alan Shearer in his squad?
Branches
But English-born strikers with Shearer's attributes aren't exactly hanging off the branches in the Premiership right now.
James Beattie at Southampton has been tried and found wanting at international level, so why doesn't Eriksson have a look at Kevin Davies, the burly Bolton striker who could provide the ideal foil for Rooney and Owen if he could reproduce the form he showed for Sam Allardyce's team last season.
This is the team, in a 4-3-3 formation, that I would like to see Eriksson turn out when England play their first World Cup qualifying: Chris Kirkland (Liverpool ); Gary Neville, capt (United), Sol Campbell (Arsenal), Rio Ferdinand (United), Ashley Cole (Arsenal); Shaun Wright-Phillips (City), Steven Gerrard (Liverpool), Frank Lampard (Chelsea), Wayne Rooney (Everton), Michael Owen (Liverpool), Kevin Davies (Bolton Wanderers).

Comments
Login or Register to comment
Paul Hince, you are a disgrace. Becks played several mediocre games in this championship. He was unlucky at the spot, lookes tire. He is however, a skilled player, and valiant leader, who got his country to the world cup, and euro, and who's place could never be threatened by a middling talent like SWP.
When I read your comments regarding Kevin Davies, and his inclusion in the England team I assumed that someone had "doctored" your submission. If you are serious then I am afraid that your judgement is flawed. Kevin Davies has struggled to get contracts at such teams as Millwall and Southampton. How can he be deemed fit to play for England? Please, now is a time for considered reflection, not a time to revert to the bovine style of playing with a lump at the front. His lack of technique, pace and low levels of skill would be exposed by international defenders. England cant afford to return to the dark days of a big centre forward with a limited game. We need to find and nuture players who are multi skilled and innovative. wayne Rooney perhaps!
OH dear me Mr Hince has really lost the plot>what a sad and twisted MUEN journalist he really is!
Exactly what did Gerrard do to earn his place in your line-up? The only contribution I saw was his goal against Switzerland, which in all honesty was put on a plate by Gary Neville, and even then the ball ricocheted off him into the net, I might even be unkind and suggest that it was a mis-hit shot from GN that found it's way into the net.
Scholes was the only one of the midfield 4 who was capable of holding the ball. His most effective game was against Croatia when he roamed across the field and into the goalmouth to good effect. In all the other games he was expected to stand on the left and act as a defender, something he clearly isn't cut out for. The problem for Paul was Erickson and the negative defensive tactics employed by England in 3 of the four games. England deserved to go out because they were the better side in only 1 of 4 games, and for their shameful misuse of their best midfield player.
There is no doubt the english manager needs to get more creative in the selection of the world cup side. However the FA needs to get more creative and move Sven on. His tactics are as strong as Beckham's penalty taking skills.
I would give the captaincy to Rio he is a great communicator
Yes, I agree. Blaming him or that or this isn't going to put England in the final. But one thing that I have noticed for a very long time. The England teams cannot play defensive football if their lives depended on it.And if you do not trouble the opposintion's defence for a long time, then you are asking for defeat. There were times when England looked like a third division team. No imagination, no passing, no passion.Just the come and try to beat us theory.
I found myself almost agreeing with Mr Hince unitil I got to the last paragraph. Kevin Davies? I'll say it again, Kevin Davies. For England?
This is only half a story by you but provokes thought and sensible debate.
Rio must return, James should be allowed more time, Ledley King was fantastic at the back in Terry's absence. We lacked a genuine left side midfield player...eg one with a natural left foot. Hargreaves nearly 'pooped' his pants when he got to play against Portugal. Teams need time to come together. Beckham was missing and needs to be sat out in order to shake him up. Owen only really turned up once in the tournament.We need to find at least those I've mentioned and more I suggest. Yes we can lift a world cup again. Have we got these players? Please continue the debate. SWP is one.
Good article Paul. Very good points. Especially about blooding new players, and going for new ideas. However, may I also add that you should be aware of the faults of Eriksson himself if there is some blame to throw around. For all the faults of some of the players, it is the COACH's job to know truthfully and honestly when a player is just not up for it. Scolari, pulled Figo in a flash and put on Postiga, who subsequently scored a great header, leaving an otherwise tight England defense wide open. Point is he pulled off Figo! Trappatoni also pulled of Totti. Why didn't Beckham get pulled off? Cause he had no options? That's *ollocks. He should've had options! He should've in that instance, as opposed to the France game, put on Heskey. Yes, Heskey. He would've given Andrade a much tougher time as opposed to the little Vassell. His options seemed to tie his hands, but Eriksson should've shown a bit more canninness a la Scolari. Who would've thought Postiga was any great before the tournament? No one. Yet Scolari saw something that he could provide. There must be a broader brush used when picking future England teams. Tried and tested internationals did not do the business AT ALL this time round. Except for Sol, Ashley, Gary and Rooney, no one really played their hearts out. So in answer to your article, I say, Give Eriksson the boot. Terry Venables is the man. Everyone knows it, and the FA should grows some volleyballs and let him back. To hell with his so called "businesss dealings". Who cares if he wins the World Cup on German territory??? Get Terry in their. He knows the game, he knows the players to pick, and above all he has the full respect of all Enlish players.
NOT KEVIN DAVIES