THE Baby Bentley culture is the latest buzz phrase in English football.
It was given headline prominence by West Ham boss Alan Curbishley on New Year's Day after seeing last season's FA Cup finalists mauled 6-0 by Reading.
The new boss's savage criticism of the Hammers' so-called brat pack, who jam their Chadwell Heath training ground with cars costing upwards of six figures, won nationwide approval.
You could almost hear the applause for his frustrated and angry rant echoing around the country.
Extortionate wage packets for the 21st century footballer have brought a fresh wave of accusations and abuse crashing down on the players.
A lot of it no doubt is fuelled by envy and there will be an even bigger target for critics to take aim at after the é128m deal that David Bekham signed yesterday.
But it has been a long, hard fight for the players to reach such elevated wage status as the Professional Footballers' Association, celebrating its centenary year this week, know only too well.
Rebels
In Manchester Town Hall's great room, rebels of the early 1900s such as United's Billy Meredith and Charlie Roberts were lauded for standing up for players' rights.
Former England international George Eastham flew in from South Africa for the occasion.
He was at the centre of a test case in 1963, funded and driven by the PFA, that was to be the start of player power and lead ultimately to today's unbelievable salaries.
"I earned in a career what they are getting in a week these days," mused 70-year-old Eastham, who couldn't quite get to grips with how his fight had led to such spiralling pay cheques in the game.
Footballers are getting bad press but Gary Neville passionately defends his fellow pros.
He is United's PFA rep and a staunch believer in fighting for the just causes, earning himself the nickname Red Nev.
The 31-year-old England defender fully appreciates the battles and sacrifices his counterparts like Meredith, Eastham and Jimmy Hill went through to win players their rights and better money.
But Neville believes the flak his colleagues have faced as a result is not fully justified.
As the PFA enters its second century, Neville says the union is facing a new battle. "One of the biggest roles the PFA is the perception of how its members are seen. The public image," he said.
"The media have made us almost like film stars. I think that is a positive but players are not just on the back pages any more but also the front. There are benefits to that but also problems for the individuals involved.
"There are dangers. There are players who have problems with drink, gambling and other addictions. That has probably happened throughout time but nowadays you can't get away with it.
Frenzy
"You can't privately get through these things. It is a very public game.
"It is a frenzy at times but you know that that is all part of being a footballer and we get rewarded for that. The rewards are incredible.
"We would play for nothing because we are doing something we love but the fact is we are getting paid an incredible amount of money.
"I like to think that 99.9 per cent of footballers are grounded. They're genuinely good lads. They are good people who mean well. People say we need to be role models but I believe that most of the time we are.
"Players make mistakes at times, including myself, but that doesn't mean we are bad people. We do try to do a lot of good work.
"We do a lot of good work outside football but that is not seen. We don't really want it to be seen. It is not reported because it is not interesting enough.
"There is no drama or glamour, it is just really good work that a lot of players undertake.
"It doesn't necessarily have to be reported but as long as people respect that it is going on. People around the Manchester area know that United do a lot of good work and City as well.
"It is never going to get the publicity and it doesn't really need to as long as people know it is going on."
Neville hit back at the Baby Bentley criticism levelled at the game's most handsomely paid players.
"When you lose a match there is a reaction. Players who win matches drive Bentleys. Players who don't win matches drive Bentleys and it changes from week to week," he added.
"You can't just say one week they are driving Bentleys and that's why they have lost the match.
"I think the pride of a players is still there and matter what car they have, what house they have.
"I have earned an incredible amount of money through football. I don't apologise for that, it is just the situation that I am in. I have a nice house and a nice car but I give 100 per cent every time I go out on to the pitch.
"I know I would have done exactly the same if I had been a footballer 40 years ago."
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet
Comments
Login or Register to comment
I dont think Alan Curbishly would agree with Garys 99.9% claim. I reckon most of the players are fairly realistic but theres no doubt a lot aren't. West Ham are a great example and for their manager to come out so pubically against them, something that very rarely happens, means that there is almost certainly a big time charlie attitude affecting a lot of players there. I dont really have any problems with players getting paid what they do. Its ridiculous, and its obscene compared to what normal people earn, but if the moneys there then they might aswell get it as the chairman. What i do think is wrong though is the "too much too soon" problem, where a young player only needs to do well for a short period to be feted as a star and command big wages and tranfer fees. Even at lower league clubs, young players seem to lose the run of themselves very easily. I seen some young Notts Forest players on tv during the wk, following their cup win, and it you'd think from the look of these lads and what they were saying that they were Galacticos. If theyre like that at League 1 Forest then i can see why Curbishley said what he did. Theres been posts on this site about player like Kieron Richardson, and why he lost his way, and people suggested it was a big time Charlie, i've made it attitude. I'd well believe it. I think Roy Keane spoke out about this aswell. Fair enough if you've proved yourself you deserve the plaudits and the money and fame that goes with it as the players bring in the crowds so they deserve as big a share of the rewards as anyone, but i think the way young players are elevated to celebrity, and millionaire status, so quickly is not a good thing
As long as we pay the entrance fees, pay for our sky subscriptions, buy the merchandise these guys will be on a fortune. I bitch about the amount of money these guys are on, BUT if an employer offered me 45- 100 k a week, I do not think I would tell them my principals were too high to accept the offer, I'd snatch their hand off !
People who are saying footballers earn obscene amounts of money are being a tad bit unfair.. Movie stars earn a lot of money for talking and reading out scripts in front of a camera.. They churn out a film, the audience pay money to watch it and the studio makes a lot of money, a cut of which goes to the stars.. Contrast it to football and it's just about the same, to not give footballers a cut of the money being pumped into the game is just unfair, there is a lot more money in the game than what they re paying the players, just ask Glazer..
loyal to the end costs 7 quid to watch a film in contrast 32 quid to go to united. you choose which film you go and watch. its not easy to stop going to the game after 43 seasons and just about 1900 games . films do not have the same pull as football and is far more difficult to give up. regardless of what you say it is obscene what these guys earn dont make excuses
loyal these guys are able to earn these amounts because the clubs know us guys who pay to go subscribe to sky and buy the merchandise will pay just about anything to get their weekly fix. methinks footie should be classified as a category a drug.
Sorry folks but that's the "Free Market" and it is hardly surprising that its chief exponent pays silly wages. The easier you are to replace the lower your wages will be. Top players are a VERY scarce resource and the rewards for winning are huge for the clubs.
Don't blame the players - good luck to them as they are doing what any sensible person would do in this system, making sure that they get their slice of the cake.
Blame the people who pay them - including yours truly for a season ticket.
Part of the problem is of course the silly amount of money sloshing around at the moment, not helped by the perception of certain Premiership clubs being Billionaries playthings. It matters a great deal that young lads, who suddenly come into a huge amount of money, are well advised and guided through the pitfalls. There are several managers who are masters at this - Ferguson, Moyes, O'Neill, Wenger to name a few. Gary is lucky that he came from the OT youth system, those at West Ham obviously haven't had the guidance he, Giggs and the rest of the United lads have enjoyed.
Nope BD, what I am trying to say is if movie stars can earn so much money, why can't footballers? They both entertain crowds.. It only becomes pathetic when players who are no good and don't give their all on the pitch get paid huge amounts of money..
Loyal to the End: They both entertain crowds??? You obviously haven't watched Chavski or the scousers recently ;-)
Chris, I dunno bout the chelsea glory hunters but the way chelsea is playing (read: stumbling)'s entertaining me!!
loyal that would be 50%+ of them then
Curbushley was right!
It is a 'sign of the times' that a player is not now satisfied with being a footballer, (something many of use wished for as kids!) and highlights their mentalilty and perceptions.
I don't care (to certain extent what a player earns as lomg as that isn't 'thrown in the fans faces'!
It quite obscene actually that so much money can be earned by one at times so young!
I for one wouldn't know what to do with so much money!
Interesting comments. I had to laugh at the BBC interview with Beckham. After being bored silly by the essex lad as he read from the prompt card -the BBC interviewers final comment was "Beckham may be able to succeed in America where Pele and Best failed..."
Beckham in the same sentence? Obviously the commentator was under 30 years old.