Ferguson was given a four-match touchline ban, two of them suspended, and a £20,000 fine by the FA for saying Wiley "just wasn't fit enough" to officiate in United's 2-2 draw with Sunderland in October.
The United manager quickly apologised for his remarks, both on the United website and in a letter to the FA.
Now referees' union Prospect has belatedly confirmed Wiley will not be pursuing a case for defamation against Ferguson.
Wiley said: "Although I was bitterly disappointed about the personal attack on me I want to put this behind me and continue to concentrate on my refereeing."
Prospect has also written to the FA to seek greater support for referees and calling for stronger action if there are similar attacks in the future.
Prospect national secretary Alan Leighton said: "Unwarranted and untrue attacks on referees damage the hard-earned reputation of our members, call into question their integrity and damage the image of the game by suggesting that the referees are incapable of doing their job.
"Referees understand and accept that their decisions will be questioned, but personal attacks are unacceptable."
Had Wiley pressed ahead with unprecedently legal action against Ferguson he would have effectively ruled himself out of officiating any United games in the future.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Monkey tennis?, yes please (24/11/2009 at 14:25)
mark jones (24/11/2009 at 14:35)
Whaley Bridge cynic. (24/11/2009 at 14:44)
Mrs Fullaway`s lodger (24/11/2009 at 14:48)
Monkey tennis?, yes please (24/11/2009 at 14:49)
Scholesy passed me the ball..., England (24/11/2009 at 14:50)
Monkey tennis - if he does ref United again, I think the pressure will be on Fergie to keep his trap shut. Can you imagine Fergie chosing his words in a press conference if Wiley drops a clanger that costs us.
Mark, South Manchester (24/11/2009 at 14:52)
I wonder why!!!!
Bill Wirral (24/11/2009 at 15:13)
GC Northstand (24/11/2009 at 15:26)
You Fat B-----
me thinks we all know the words
There's no spoon long enough to let me sup with the (Red) devil', The clock is ticking. (24/11/2009 at 15:28)
yorkie-cpm, Huddersfield (24/11/2009 at 15:59)
stevi, france (24/11/2009 at 16:04)
United:The team supported by the majority of mancunians (24/11/2009 at 16:06)
Blimey. Wiley's a Bertie!!
mark jones (24/11/2009 at 16:30)
Algernon Blabbermouth, eccles (24/11/2009 at 16:45)
Let them sue and be damned!
Jack Thorley Trafford, Timperley (24/11/2009 at 17:04)
Scholesy passed me the ball..., England (24/11/2009 at 17:08)
You talk about being educated then say "your" instead of "you're". Ever heard of about people in glass houses? You've ended up making your self look a bit silly - not for the first time.
neil youngs left foot (24/11/2009 at 17:14)
Dave-K, ex-Cheadle (24/11/2009 at 18:24)
Football should copy tennis — allow a team, through the captain, to challenge, say, two decisions during the course of a match. Not every minor push, shove or trip, of course, but specific incidents such as key offsides, penalty claims etc (no captain is going to waste his challenges on trips and pushes in the middle of the park). In tennis, these player challenges in no way compromise or undermine the authority of the official: it just accepts that in a fast moving game, the human eye can't always make a correct judgement. In football, the matter is more acute than in tennis, since so many players can block the referee's view.
If referees want respect then they have to earn it by not giving goof-ball decisions that affect the result of important games. Technology, used sensibly, can help achieve this without disrupting the game.
DUB RED, CLONDALKIN (24/11/2009 at 18:37)
MASSIVE clubs r us, salford (24/11/2009 at 18:56)
dennis laws backheel (24/11/2009 at 19:02)
24/11/2009 at 17:08
Errr and you learnt England where??
Matthew Savage (24/11/2009 at 19:35)
Bill of Bury, Lancashire (24/11/2009 at 20:13)
StretfordBLUE in America, Born a BLUE and Forever (24/11/2009 at 21:41)