The Premier League champions made £71.8m for the season 2007-8 to put them at the top of the money tree globally.
Their revenue of £257.1m also saw them outperform the rest of their Premier League rivals - with figures suggesting they are bucking the global economic crisis.
Giant
But they are still behind Real Madrid (£289.6m) in terms of revenue generated, though that owes much to the slump of the pound against the Euro.
The figures - compiled by Deloitte's Annual Review of Football Finance - come a day after United announced a new £80m shirt sponsorship deal with American financial giant Aon Corp.
That deal and the results published by Deloitte will be further justification to the Glazer family that they are fully capable of servicing the £500m debt leveraged to buy the club in 2005.
And even if they are still to win over their fiercest critics, with supporters last season petitioning the Office of Fair Trading over the club's ticketing policies, they have found staunch allies in Sir Alex Ferguson and chief executive, David Gill, during a period of unprecedented success on the field.
While United have claimed a hat-trick of Premier League titles since 2007, they have also reached back-to-back Champions League finals having lifted the trophy last season.
The Glazers have also backed Ferguson to the hilt in the transfer market and resisted the temptation to sell Cristiano Ronaldo last season, when Real Madrid were prepared to pay a world record £70m for the Portuguese international.
All of that after United had appeared to have slipped perilously behind Chelsea and even Arsenal following Roman Abramovich's entrance into English football.
Gill has even gone so far as to credit the Glazers with playing a major role in leading the club to their latest period of dominance.
"What happened after the takeover is that a lot of the uncertainties - with certain holders having 25 or 30 per cent stakes, and it was all very public because we were quoted on the stock exchange - all of that has been taken away now," he said.
"We've got the stability of the family owning the club. Long-term decisions can be taken and that's been proved with the results we've achieved over the last two or three years.
Issues
"In 2005 we had some issues. We'd been knocked out of the Champions League at the group stage, Vodafone announced they wouldn't be continuing the relationship and Roy Keane left under a cloud.
"But no one panicked or made rash decisions.
"We were in it for the long-term and so that situation has followed through the last few years and hopefully many years to come."
Aside from ticket price increases, many of the accusations levelled at the Glazers have failed to come to fruition.
There has been no asset-stripping of the club's biggest stars, as feared by some supporters, nor has there been any suggestion of Old Trafford being renamed to bring in extra sponsorship revenue.
But one major question mark remains as to what will happen if United fail to keep up their standards on the pitch.
Massive success by Ferguson's side, plus increased TV revenue, has helped them outperform their rivals home and abroad, but should that dip, it remains to be seen how serviceable their debts would be.
Gill, however, refutes such claims.
Debt
"The borrowing was put in place on a long-term basis and the club can service that debt easily," he said.
"There is no real pressure. We've shown good growth in commercial positions since the takeover.
"From our perspective, if you look at our results we are comfortable that the debt can be serviced and the club can continue to grow."
United are not the only top flight club with major debt, with the net figure for the league increasing to £3.1bn in 2007-8 up from £2.7bn the previous season.
Paul Rawnsley of Deloitte, said: "While debt in the Premier League has risen, two-thirds of this debt is in respect of just four clubs - Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United - and around £1.2bn is non-interest bearing `soft loans'.
"On the positive side of the balance sheet, these four clubs also had £1bn of assets in respect of investment in stadia and other facilities and a further £450m from investment in players.
"Debt is not necessarily a bad thing for clubs, as long as it is manageable within a club's finances and is sustainable and repayable."
United's revenue figures dwarfed those of Premier League runners-up Liverpool (£164.2m) and City (£82.3m). The new TV rights deal sent Premier League clubs' revenue soaring to £1,932m in 2007-8 and revenues are estimated to have reached £2bn in 2008-9 according to Deloitte.
And while they are expected to grow in 2009-10, it is set to be at a slower pace given the credit crunch.
Realities
Deloitte's Dan Jones said: "The new economic realities may lead to flat matchday revenues.
"While attendances continue to hold up well, many clubs have frozen or reduced ticket prices. However, the stepped increases in the domestic broadcast deal and the new UEFA Champions League TV deal make it likely overall revenues will edge up."
Wage costs increased by £227m (23 per cent) in 2007-8 to reach £1.2bn, the largest annual increase recorded by the Premier League.
Spending in both the Summer 2008 and January 2009 transfer windows reached new record levels with an estimated £675m investment in new players.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
A Manc and blue (04/06/2009 at 08:37)
barca99, Salford (04/06/2009 at 08:49)
Who knows with world record operating profits like these United and the Glazer posse may be subject to another takeover from businessmen keen on actually seeing a profit from there input, hey you never know even the Bitters owners could put in a bid? Think about it buy United for £700 million and you'll get your money back in 8/10 years or keep hold of City and by 2020 they'll be that skint they'll be shining shoes outside the Jumeirah Beach.
Just a thought
barca99, Salford (04/06/2009 at 08:53)
Thats another myth put to bed then, not myth i meant Bitter barrel scraping allegation.
bluemoooon (04/06/2009 at 09:04)
If that puts your mind at rest then I have a bridge over the Thames in London I could let you have at a reasonable price
Robbo, N2409, M16 (04/06/2009 at 09:08)
bobbydazzler (04/06/2009 at 09:22)
men quotes a debt of 500m due to the leveraged buyout.
the bbc world news today published that uniteds debt has grown to 699m.
whatever the real level of the debt and who it belongs to united "supposed" record profit is insufficient to pay off the whole of the interest on money the glazers borrowed to mortgage OUR club.
should they be lucky enough to sell on a make a profit ,the club will still be in the same situation it is in now. the new owners will have paid the yanks a premium price and will want a return on their investment which will mean even more money going out of the club.
Uncle Buck, Manchester, home of MCFC - 1st in Manchester & still here. (04/06/2009 at 09:26)
We Shall Overcome, STOCKPORT (04/06/2009 at 10:02)
TAXI FOR TEVEZ HAHAHAHA
Alias Smith, over the moon (04/06/2009 at 10:09)
Private Fraser, Warmington-On-Sea (04/06/2009 at 10:17)
IS IT REALLY 33 YEARS, TAMESIDE (04/06/2009 at 10:29)
jerseyblue, jersey (04/06/2009 at 10:37)
4/06/2009 at 08:49
What world stars are United linked to currently.......?
I think you may be the favourites to be the club that City knock out of the top four.
Gone are the days you could out spend the rest. And boy does your team need some investment.
Growler (04/06/2009 at 10:42)
danny, WILMSLOW (04/06/2009 at 10:51)
He obviously is going to play VDS GIGGS SCHOLES NEVILLE til they join him on pension.
Red Mist, Pudsey (04/06/2009 at 11:14)
I opposed the Glazers taking over our club, I joined in all the marches etc. But perhaps, with hindsight, having private owners in these troubled times is the lesser of two evils. Cue a tirade from the Glazer boo boys...
barca99, Salford (04/06/2009 at 11:19)
fallowfield red, M19 (04/06/2009 at 11:20)
Sheikh Rattle 'n' Roll With It, Bury (04/06/2009 at 11:20)
4/06/2009 at 08:37
Now come on A Manc and blue, lets be fair, your posting is inaccurate, don't want our United friends berating you, it was our Owner (singular) who made the £1.5billion profit.
barca99, Salford (04/06/2009 at 11:41)
red john (04/06/2009 at 11:42)
O'Fortuna (04/06/2009 at 11:42)
Is this profit calculated before or after ALL costs? What does the figure look like when for example loan and tax payments are calculated in? I think this story is all about the swamp trying to promote their credit worthiness to banks and other clubs, even Kia perhaps!!
Also for the revenues to be repeated they need money from glory hunters who by definition only pay for glory...the first time they go a season or two without glory they will not only lose the glory income from glory hunting fans but they will lose the additional prize and tv money. When tax and loan payments are calculated into that scenario...it all looks cheerily bleak.
Judge Nutmeg, Manchester (04/06/2009 at 11:47)
steve wilson (04/06/2009 at 11:59)
barca99, Salford (04/06/2009 at 12:03)
And on what basis does a team thats just won the league and been runners-up in the CL need 'some investment'?
I'd be more worried at the dross you follow mate cos all that money and you can only attract Gareth Barry would be not only a worry to the fans but also a worry to your owner, perhaps he might be getting to grips with what he's actually bought, a club with little or no attraction, Lucas Neil next, flippin eck i'm cacking myself, whos next Jermaine Pennant? Titus Bramble? Daniel Cousin?
Free Red, Manchester (04/06/2009 at 12:10)