Brown: Kept the lid on potential threat of Ashley Young 6
Ferdinand: Whether it was big man Carew or speedy Agbonlahor he stood his ground 8
Vidic: Ditto his defensive sidekick. On top of everything Villa threw at them 8
Evra: His attacks were quelled but his defensive duties were performed admirably 6
Park: Little of the fizz that highlighted his New Year's Day comeback 5
Anderson: Couple of surging runs promised much but came to little 5
Carrick: Lot of safety first stuff but killer balls at a premium 6
Giggs: His first half miss would have haunted him but his assist and second half display got him off the hook 7
Ronaldo: Was having a frustrating match at times but he kept going and it paid off 7
Saha: The Frenchman ran into a lot of brick walls. Nothing to get teeth into in area 5
Subs:
Rooney (sub Park 70) Livened Reds up 7
Hargreaves (sub Saha 79) Steady impact 6
O'Shea (sub 90) No time for mark
Nani, Heaton not used
Aston Villa: Carson, Bouma (Gardner 83), Mellberg, Laursen, Barry, Young, Carew (Moore 64), Agbonlahor, Davies, Petrov (Maloney 75), Reo-Coker
Goals:
Aston Villa: None
United: Ronaldo (80) Rooney (89)
Bookings:
Aston Villa: None
United: None
Referee: M Atkinson - Handled it well. 8
Attendance: 33,630
Agree with the ratings? Have your say.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
neal 07, Birmingham (irish born) (05/01/2008 at 19:40)
shape up or ship out Louis
iyke tevez, lagos nigera (05/01/2008 at 19:46)
How on earth can anderson get a 5. He clearly played very well and deserves an 8. Ronaldo too.
Nice to see Rooney back looking very refreshed. Saha didnt play well but was better than his previous games. He lacks confidence still.
Carrick still havent learnt how to do the easiest thing in football i.e pass the ball to your team mate. although he improved as the game went on. Cant wait to see scholes back in the team.
Red Dawn (05/01/2008 at 19:47)
The entire defence deserved 8, and the goalkeeper 7 considering he had little to do.
Park deserved more than a 5, as he was probably our best player going forward in the first half, so I'd give him 7.
Anderson played well in the first half, but faded in the second, so again I think 5 is a little slack. I'd give him 6.
Giggs was awful in the first half, but very good in the second. I think 6.5 is about right.
Ronaldo was very poor for the majority of the game, and the amount of times he went over looking for free kicks was not very sportsman like. However, he was involved for both goals, so I'd give him 6.5 if I could for that alone, although it was a deflected shot that led to Rooney scoring.
Carrick played OK. He was solid enough, but gave the ball away a fair few times and wasn't very creative. His job was more or less to sit in front of the back 4, and he did it well enough. 6 for Michael.
Rooney changed the game when he came on, he was outstanding. Even though he was only on for such a short time, I think he deserved 9 for the impact he made.
Saha just didn't get the service - period. He had no impact on the game because of that. 5 for Louis I'm afraid.
oddpeder (05/01/2008 at 19:47)
Riquelminho (05/01/2008 at 19:52)
I don't know if the person rating this game was watching the same game I was watching. Anderson was arguably our best attacker in the first half and his passing and vision was excellent. He didnt put a foot wrong today. Easily deserves 7.
Same with Park- he was a bundle of energy and played well. 7
Giggs looked pretty tired and besides the assist did pretty much nothing besides miss that great chance in the first half- 6
Carrick- not a good performance and passes backwards rather than forwards far too often. Some of his passes had my heart in my mouth.-5
Honestly, the ratings are far too harsh, especially considering Villa packed men behind the ball and made it very difficult.
Sheesh! They get the ratings wrong every week!
Red Lou, Malta (05/01/2008 at 19:52)
Steve in Brussels (05/01/2008 at 19:54)
In summary a professional performance. we defended well and wore them down like Italians. Carrick did well in the holding role but Ronaldo was not great today either and Saha was poor. Basically I had a feeling Villa might nick it 1-0 until Rooney came on and gave us another dimension. At that point Ronaldo and the whole attack came alive.
That Valtinho is why we all rate Rooney so highly as we do Ronaldo so cannot see why you always seem to not see his quality. Both are different players in style but when they are on form they share one common trait - they are very difficult to stop - and that is why defenders hate playing against them.
mjw, New York (05/01/2008 at 20:02)
shen (05/01/2008 at 20:05)
Danny, Wilmslow (05/01/2008 at 20:10)
Mrs Fullaway`s lodger (05/01/2008 at 20:15)
I found Giggs to be alsmost at the top of his game except for the close miss at the end of the first half, would give him a very good 8, Carrick was abysmal in the first half, maybe a 4, Rooney turned the game on his own when he came on, at least a 9 or a 9.5! Rio was pure class, along with Vidic both an 8. Scrappy game until Rooney came on but that was all that Villa allowed, they were getting tired when the Roo came on.
Give it your best Lee!
Mrs Fullaway`s lodger (05/01/2008 at 20:17)
Teledon (05/01/2008 at 20:35)
Dev, Johannesburg (05/01/2008 at 21:12)
Sorry to see Saha not perform again - but still think he does well with Rooney partnering him. Predicted 2-0 but thought it would come way before the final 10 minutes. Still, Villa never looked like they would score, so it was only a matter of time.......
Junaid Adesegun, Bayswater (05/01/2008 at 21:31)
I feel Ronaldo is getting selfish bcos he wants to score always. He refuses to release when the team has space to score. If not for the goal, should have been rated 5 or 6.
bleeding-red-always, salford (05/01/2008 at 21:36)
red since i can remember (circa 1976), Malta (05/01/2008 at 22:01)
SAPPER, MANCHESTER (05/01/2008 at 23:42)
Giggs does not ddeserve the rating as nine times out of ten gave the ball away, only let of slightly by his assist.
Ronaldo may have scored but well below par. Saha not even a 1 as he was awfull thoughout the game whenever he got the ball within a seconde or two Villa had it back, not the player he was and so far no amount of game is going to make him any better.
Defence was very good and diagree with Evra's ratint he was a 7 aleast, and so was Park he was like the energiser bunny never stopped and I woould not have taken him off but either Saha or Giggs would have come off before him.
Agree with Rooney coming on because until he did there was no chance of us scoring or even making any chances, why was it so long before he came on though.
Anderson was also worth more than he got, and Carrick less as he gove the ball away to much as well.
Glad of the result though, perhaps it will gee them up a little bit.
arletta red, USA (06/01/2008 at 00:33)
Steve, Glossop (06/01/2008 at 00:47)
Devil's Own,, malaysia (06/01/2008 at 03:09)
pok, singapore (06/01/2008 at 03:45)
Pok, S`pore
pok, singapore (06/01/2008 at 03:50)
Pok, S`pore
i bleed Man United, Botswana (06/01/2008 at 05:16)
Gerry, Glastonbury (06/01/2008 at 09:21)
Saha had very little to go for and was generally well marshalled. Wes does give the ball away a lot but is a very solid defender and played his part in what was an excellent back four performance, Villa never had a serious attempt on goal.
Our two centre backs were tremendous. The Roon was the difference and a very good cameo from him.
I couldn't believe the crowd, 9,000 down on capacity? Was this just because it was televised? The league game here was a sell out!