The Manchester United and England striker faces two months on the sidelines after suffering a hairline fracture of his left foot during the clash with Reading on Sunday, the third time since 2004 he has suffered injuries to his feet.
The first forced him off in the Euro 2004 quarter-final against Portugal and delayed his debut with Manchester United after his move from Everton.
The second happened just before the 2006 World Cup, giving the player a race against time to be fit for the finals in Germany.
Some have speculated that modern boot design puts players at greater risk of foot injuries, but Charlie Brooks, head of corporate communications for Nike UK, has told Channel 4 News that the boot that Wayne had been testing was not to blame.
He said: "He himself is personally absolutely confident, as we are, that the boot had nothing to do with his injury.
"Nearly 20 per cent of the professional players in the Barclays Premier league this weekend were wearing this boot.
Testing
"I think it is a boot that stands up to all kinds of testing... and stands up to on-pitch demand.
"I think what happened to Wayne is an unfortunate football injury.
"When we were developing this boot we worked extensively with Wayne.
"He was part of the development testing process... he went over to our headquarters in the United States and he tested the boot extensively over there."
United boss Sir Alex Ferguson confirmed the injury would keep the 21-year-old out for two months, making him a major doubt for England's Euro 2008 qualifiers against Israel and Russia.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Happyblue, Failsworth (13/08/2007 at 20:12)
Gilly, Belgium (13/08/2007 at 21:19)
But united now have to get on with it and WIN!
Forward with Frank (14/08/2007 at 07:45)
edinburgh red, edinburgh (14/08/2007 at 08:22)
Happyblue, Failsworth (14/08/2007 at 08:45)
Palmer, London (yeah, yeah, heard it all before) (14/08/2007 at 08:56)
They are all either injured of rubbish.
Birdy, Ireland (14/08/2007 at 08:59)
bremen red (14/08/2007 at 09:39)
I think Tevez is the best possible replacement for the ROO, and I can`t wait to see them line up together. Think we`ll have to wait till November though, the bone alone takes six weeks to mend, then he`s got to get match fit after that.
He`s gonna have to take measures to protect that foot in future, some sort of shoe-inlays or summit. Each injury was caused by the defender standing/stamping on his foot...
Happyblue, Failsworth (14/08/2007 at 09:44)
Demo, Glossop (14/08/2007 at 09:45)
Mick, Dublin (14/08/2007 at 10:00)
Demo, Glossop (14/08/2007 at 10:48)
TMUF, Manchester (14/08/2007 at 11:21)
bobbydazzler (14/08/2007 at 11:42)
Birdy, Ireland (14/08/2007 at 11:43)
A Mancunian, Manchester (14/08/2007 at 12:03)
Mick, Dublin (14/08/2007 at 12:06)
I also think Rooney might be more prone than most because he's so heavily built and powerful, yet gets around the pitch like someone half his size.
Luckily, the strength in the muscles and tendons in his legs seems to provide decent support for his major joints (knees, ankles etc.) but maybe delicate bones, like his metatarsals, are put through that bit more stress than those in other players?
Kevin, Tralee, Eire (14/08/2007 at 12:32)
Mick, Dublin (14/08/2007 at 12:45)
I don't think it's a massive problem anyway. He played a hell of a lot of football last season and not a bother on him.
Redtothebones, Mauritius (14/08/2007 at 13:14)
ged (14/08/2007 at 13:38)
Or was the test they did to look nice?
On another note, what sort of studs were worn be these evil Rooney stampers?
Jrogger, Canterbury (14/08/2007 at 13:59)
JonyB-), North Staffs (14/08/2007 at 14:03)
Duncan, London (14/08/2007 at 14:16)
Mick, Dublin (14/08/2007 at 14:42)
Modern boots have come in for a lot of flak but I've heard another theory that modern pitchs are much better drained and have a lot less give in them. It means they don't get torn up so easy but there are obvious downsides too.