Just a few hours before Bayern's Champions League quarter-final defeat against AC Milan last night, Beckenbauer said: "If it is right that there is an offer of £17m-£20m for Hargreaves, then I would seriously consider accepting it.
"I think the board will also think this way to satisfy the needs of the player."
Refused
The 26-year-old England international has been a long-standing United target, but the Bavarians have resolutely refused to deal with the Premiership leaders.
They believe Hargreaves should honour the new four-year contract he signed last summer.
But United have made no secret of the fact that their interest in the player is still alive.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
chris, oxford (12/04/2007 at 11:10)
Robbo, North Stand (12/04/2007 at 11:20)
Red Lou, Malta (12/04/2007 at 11:26)
Danny, Wilmslow (12/04/2007 at 11:34)
Mick, Dublin (12/04/2007 at 11:39)
That said, SAF clearly rates him so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
ged (12/04/2007 at 11:51)
edinburgh red, edinburgh (12/04/2007 at 11:55)
ged (12/04/2007 at 11:58)
Dave-K, ex-Cheadle (12/04/2007 at 11:59)
Alias Smith, over the moon (12/04/2007 at 12:04)
Steve, Glossop (12/04/2007 at 12:23)
Birdy, Ireland (12/04/2007 at 12:42)
There is no way on this green earth that the lad is worth 17-20m, and if we pay that kind of a fee for an honest, hard working, high energy but limited player then we deserve a good kicking. People have used the arguement that if he's the right player then he's worth the money - rubbish. Firstly Hargreaves aint the only defensive midfielder in the world. Secondly he's not even the best defensive midfielder in the world. Thirdly it seems that theres no other big clubs after him, hence strenghtening our bargaining position. Fourthly the player desperately wants to leave and come to us and has said so publicly. Sixth he's coming off the back of an injury hit season. And last but not least he's roughly 10m over priced. He seems like a good player, and i think he probably would be a good signing, but thats no reason for us to be mugged on the deal. We've missed out on much better players because we wouldnt pay the fee before, sometimes less than the quoted Hargreaves fee, so i dont see why we should break the mould now and pay over the odds. If he was the only player we needed, then maybe, just maybe, but even then no, not for that money.
We're all on cloud 9 following the Roma win but we have to remember we still need a replacement for Giggs and a striker, and if we hand over an extra 7-10m to Bayern than we should then its gonna hurt us when it comes to other areas of the side
Jack Thorley, Trafford (12/04/2007 at 12:48)
Alias Smith, over the moon (12/04/2007 at 13:08)
Alf For The Devils, Ipswich (12/04/2007 at 13:19)
We mainly need to improve our sub players:1 CM, 1 CF and 1 winger.Thus SELL KR and Sylvestre.
Balders, Tier 2 Stretford (12/04/2007 at 13:27)
Balders, Tier 2 Stretford (12/04/2007 at 13:29)
chris, oxford (12/04/2007 at 13:31)
colmchapman (12/04/2007 at 13:34)
stu, london (12/04/2007 at 13:35)
Alan (12/04/2007 at 13:38)
stu, london (12/04/2007 at 13:43)
Birdy is utterly right regarding the price. But if we pay it, I will support OH the same as everyone else.
Demo, Glossop (12/04/2007 at 13:48)
spencertea, Brussels (12/04/2007 at 13:58)
Andy P, Wythenshawe, Manchester (12/04/2007 at 14:01)