The Blues manager has refuted claims his defence should shoulder the blame for the run of five straight draws which has slowed the early- season charge for a Champions League place.
Critics were quick to pick up on the collective and individual errors which saw the Blues gift Burnley two goals, and then concede a late equaliser after they had fought back to lead 3-2.
But Hughes unleashed his fury on the whole team for that slip, and has re-asserted the old football maxim that defending begins from the front.
The Blues head for Anfield on Saturday for a Premier League clash which will give them a pointer or two when it comes to their ambitions of landing a top four place this season.
And the emphasis for the Blues in training this week will be on eradicating the kind of mistakes which cost two points against the Clarets.
Hughes is aware the back four which turned out against Burnley had only played together three times before that game, and that an injury meant Wayne Bridge - so loudly criticised by Match of the Day pundit Alan Hansen - was only 50-50 about being able to play.
But even without such mitigating factors, Hughes says the failure against Burnley ran right through the team.
"It's a collective thing," he said. "It's not just about the guys at the back but about stopping things at source before they develop.
"We have to recognise that if the opposition is trying to clip balls into their front men, we have to work exceptionally hard to stop those balls coming in.
"At the moment that is part of our game we are not doing very well."
Hughes also feels the Blues' rip-roaring start to the season, when they racked up four straight league wins and a Carling Cup victory at Crystal Palace - with clean sheets in four of the five victories - had a cosmetic effect.
Prowess
"We are a new side in terms of number of games played, and we set off like a house on fire," he said.
"We were encouraged by that, but knew there would be occasions when we didn't function simply because of the number of games we have played together.
"It's a learning process, but we are still picking up points, which is an important factor."
There is a danger that City's attacking prowess - they have only failed to score in one game this season - could also cover up some of the cracks, as they almost did against Burnley.
But the fact that the Blues are capable of out-scoring opponents does not fool Hughes, and he wants to instil a more ruthless mind-set in his troops.
"We are trying to eradicate the errors from our game because they are hampering us," he said. "In an attacking sense some of the stuff we produced against Burnley was excellent.
"That will always be in our play, but we have to understand late in games you have to see the opposition off, discourage them and disappoint them. At the moment we are struggling to have that ability.
"You have to be able to take the sting out of things, not give the opposition any encouragement and make them think there is nothing down for them.
"We have to be strong and resolute and see those types of games out, make sure those lapses don't become prevalent in our game."
Hughes has again been frustrated by the international break, which has restricted the amount of time he has had to work on the problems.
But despite failing to notch a win in their last five games, Hughes says the belief in the side as an attacking force remains intact.
"I don't think our confidence will be affected because we know we will always score goals," he said. "But we know we have to be better defensively as a team.
"I know the players and their characters and I know we will get a response."
Hughes is also quick to point out that leaking goals and shedding points is not something peculiar to the Blues in the most open Premier League race for years.
"Teams are dropping points and we have to make sure even when we don't play particularly well we can still take something from the game," he said.
"That's a positive and if it continues we will be OK. But we have to improve because we know we are better than that."
One plus for the back four was the return to action of Nedum Onuoha, who played the full 90 minutes for City against the United Arab Emirates in Abu Dhabi on Thursday and may make Saturday's squad.
"It's good to be back," said Onuoha. "It's been frustrating for me for the past few weeks, having to watch things from the sidelines.
"When you can see the team has so much potential to do well, you need to be 100 per cent just to get a place in the squad. Hopefully I've taken the right steps towards playing again."
Onuoha may step in as right back, with both Micah Richards and Pablo Zabaleta having problems there this season.
Hughes is likely to make that position his priority in the January transfer window, but Onuoha says he has not been targeting the spot.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Dukinfield Blue, Manchester (18/11/2009 at 09:51)
PJS, Oz (18/11/2009 at 09:54)
Telling players defending must improve is all good and well, but you dont wave a magic wand and suddenly see it happen magically. Defending has been a massive issue, different faces, same problems and the natural conclusion is that the coaching staff havent found a way to mitigate this.
God help us on Saturday when Liverpool have 55-60% posession and have us under the kosh with their ball retention for long spells in our own half.
I like our chances of scoring on the break vs Liverpool and thats how they have been conceding many of their goals lately. We sure as well won't be keeping many clean sheets with our management team's tactic of "buy expensive defenders and hope they sort it for themselves".
Chris-Sao Paulo, JP, Brazil (18/11/2009 at 09:56)
The problem is clearly Bridge and Lescot. It really gets on my wick that people can't see this, especially a reporter on a so-called football page.
We have a leftback in the squad who was considered good enough by Barcelona to play in the European Cup final..............only Hughes thinks he`s not good enough for massive City.
dingdongbell, north (18/11/2009 at 09:58)
The Kippax Kid, Irlam (now West Sussex) (18/11/2009 at 10:00)
Brisbane Blue (18/11/2009 at 10:16)
Time for Onuoha I think
Toure, Onuoha, Lescott, Bridge and somewhere in the team must go Vincent Kompany but I can't work out where unless MH goes to 4-5-1 or 4-3-2-1
Blue Benny (18/11/2009 at 10:21)
Edwardo'(Gerry Craney's love child), Sale (18/11/2009 at 10:28)
Co. Kildare Blue (18/11/2009 at 10:33)
jo alves (18/11/2009 at 10:36)
mozza, manchester (18/11/2009 at 10:39)
jo alves (18/11/2009 at 10:44)
MBLUED, UK (18/11/2009 at 10:47)
Farawayblue, West Sussex (18/11/2009 at 10:51)
Shaun, At My Desk (18/11/2009 at 11:04)
Sam Haggar-MCFC BLUEMOON IS RISEING (18/11/2009 at 11:04)
Brissy Blue, Brisbane, Australia (18/11/2009 at 11:16)
Planet City (18/11/2009 at 11:17)
Back 4 Micah Kolo Nedum & Joleon... Sorted!
C'mon City !!!
danny coleman (18/11/2009 at 11:22)
why not come up with something new
Yashin, Manchester (18/11/2009 at 11:31)
1028
You beat me to the exact point I am concerned about..If MH new that Bridge was only 50/50 then why have we got Silvinho on the books??
Mind boggles sometimes............
The Big Easy, (18/11/2009 at 11:43)
You spent the money,you brought the players and you choose team formation and tactics,so theere is no excuse Mr Hughes.
Elb Owdeep (18/11/2009 at 11:52)
18/11/2009 at 10:00 - proper fan you aren't you. idiot
Evan Georgiou (18/11/2009 at 11:55)
Peter Beagrie`s beagle (18/11/2009 at 12:01)
You have to be a very, very, very good player to stroll out of the six yard box with the ball at your feet, beating opposition forwards on the way, we havem`t got players like that.
Richards thinks he is a right winger, Bridge thinks he is a left winger and Lescott thinks he is a ball boy judging by some of his defensive positioning.
We have enough forward fire power, what we need is bone crunching full backs who can frighten the opposition forwards, let`s get them in January Hughes, Oh and Ned in for Lescott wouldn`t be a bad idea eh? CTID
Uwe the Goat, Brighton (18/11/2009 at 12:13)
Dear Mark,
You are the manager of Man City and I fully support you and wish you well.
To your credit, you have brought a lot of good players to the club in a short space of time, and even those fans who are most critical of you would have bought many of the same players had they been in their shoes.
However, you must now forget about star names, transfer fees and player politics and pick the 11 that you think has the best chance of beating Liverpool. A massive benchmark game for the club and your most important test to date given the context of recent results by both clubs.
Those that are lucky enough to get the shirt, or to come on as subs (you are allowed to make 3 substitutions by the way, and you don't have to wait until 80 minutes have passed!) should show you how much it means to them by the quality of their performances. On merit, and on merit alone, those that shine deserve to stay in the side, and if that means a 19 year old keeps a 19 million pound player out of the team then so be it.
The players suit the way you want to play and not the other way round, you have got absolutely loads of strikers, midfielders and defenders on the books, so nobody, I repeat nobody needs to be accomodated in a non-natural position just to keep their agent sweet.
Tell all the players that you don't care about what you read in the papers, you want them to do their talking on the pitch and that is the only thing that will keep them in or out of the side.
Good luck and three points please.
A supporter.