But, by the same token, the Swede's first season should not be seen entirely through rose-tinted spectacles.
When, later this week, Thaksin Shinawatra sits down to explain to Eriksson why he has developed severe doubts about him being the right man for the Blues, it is understood from those close to him that he will pinpoint transfer dealings, tactics and second half of the season results as the main planks of his discontent.
The former Thai Prime Minister will voice his disquiet that many of the men Eriksson brought in have either not lived up to their price tag or fulfilled their promise in the way he expected.
It may not come as a great shock to a manager whose transfer dealings have also been a subject exercising the minds of those thousands of City fans who have so vocally supported the `Save our Sven' campaign.
While there in no argument that the Swede has brought respect, dignity and some wonderful football to City this season and in a fair world would not even be close to facing the axe - the season may be viewed a little differently if you are the man picking up the tab.
Questions, some of them painful and difficult, should be and must be asked in the same way as they are in all businesses during annual reviews. A dearth of goals and a tally of five wins in the last 18 games from the turn of the year is not the kind of record that earns managers a pay rise or a pat on the back from any chairman.
Soft defeats at relegated Reading and Birmingham, when a top six place yawned invitingly for the taking are known to have particularly irritated the Blues owner.
But the main focus of the review that will take place face to face in Thailand will be the alarming dip in form and the transfers starting with Italian striker Rolando Bianchi.
Costly
When he arrived at a cost of £9m Bianchi became the second most costly player in City history but he failed to adapt to the Premier League so spectacularly that he had to be loaned back to Serie A having started just seven games.
A wage of close to £60,000 per week hardly made that particular pill any easier to swallow for the chairman.
The form of Spanish full-back Javier Garrido has also been a concern and another high earner, Brazilian Geovanni, never managed to establish himself in the side.
In addition, Mexican international Nery Castillo has failed to make his mark during the first half of a year-long loan from Shakhtar Donetsk and there has been precious little evidence so far that the £5.2m spent on Ecuador's Felipe Caicedo has been money well used.
He didn't even receive a call from the bench during the 8-1 defeat at Middlesbrough when Benjani - a signing who has so far been given the benefit of the doubt by the supporters - had departed the scene injured.
Then there are the enigmas that are Brazil play-maker Elano and Bulgarian winger Martin Petrov both high class performers but dogged by inconsistency, there may well have to be answers as to why the Brazilian was played out of position so often.
On the other side of the coin, Eriksson will argue that he carried out instructions to the letter this season with a top ten place and that his young team needs time to mature together and that given the right additions - a holding midfielder, a right winger, and a another striker to name but three - they would be able to sustain a higher level of consistency next time around.
He could say with justification, too, that Gelson Fernandes has clearly improved over the season and that Vedran Corluka had been a big success until his form faded with Euro 2008 in sight.
Shinawatra may choose to counter with the fact that Richard Dunne, Joe Hart, Micah Richards and Michael Johnson who have all been critically acclaimed this season were already at Eastlands when Eriksson arrived and so were other regulars Michael Ball, Stevie Ireland and Darius Vassell.
Whatever the merits of each point of view; the one thing that cannot be contested is that while all this uncertainty abounds the Blues image is being harmed just at a time when it ought to be flourishing.
And the people who are suffering most are the fans who must try and preserve some optimism and pick some sense out of what appears to be a farcical situation.
Eriksson with all his knowledge, experience, calmness and respect is entitled to some loyalty whilst Shinawatra's drive, ambition and cash investment deserves a return.
Although something of an odd couple, they ought to be a perfect match. Is it too much to hope that they may yet be so?
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
SoulboyFTR (13/05/2008 at 11:12)
GORB, MANCHESTER (13/05/2008 at 11:12)
OrigamiNinja, Inverness (13/05/2008 at 11:14)
The MEN has unquestionably put itself in the Pro Sven camp allowing the likes of Paul Hince to publish nonsense articles suggesting he would rather have City relegated than have Thaksin in charge and now all of a sudden the MEN wants to play devils advocate? I dont buy it, methinks they know something we dont?
Bluereed (13/05/2008 at 11:23)
I think every supporter just want's some clarity on this awfull mess and quick?!
Michael Caine, Rorke's Drift (13/05/2008 at 11:26)
Spiderman (13/05/2008 at 11:27)
Bert is my hero (13/05/2008 at 11:28)
ablueneville, Somewhere in yorkshire (13/05/2008 at 11:29)
Happy To Be Blue, Manchester (13/05/2008 at 11:30)
bigbri, cheshire (13/05/2008 at 11:32)
It's time that the press ended this stupid witch hunt against our club and chairman, but did it really have to take 3 straight losses and an 8-1 thrashing for them to see matters from other people's points of view?
Many supporters have been writing as much in 2008 on this very site! Still, the penny drops slower for a few eh?
Kent Blue, Kent (13/05/2008 at 11:33)
LEE BRADBURY CITY RUINED MY LIFE (13/05/2008 at 11:34)
True Blue,Galway.Ireland, Galway (13/05/2008 at 11:34)
dennis d, coventry (13/05/2008 at 11:35)
Blue Gawbie (13/05/2008 at 11:37)
Colin Bell's Underpants (13/05/2008 at 11:37)
Mr Bailey talks about a return from the money invested. Well from a supporter's viewpoint, should I not also expect a return on my money? What I expect from my investment is commitment, enthusiasm, effort and a will to win from the players and staff. I don't believe that they have fulfilled my expectations, so why should I renew my SC?
Jack Thorley Trafford, Trafford (13/05/2008 at 11:39)
Chippy_boy (13/05/2008 at 11:42)
Yes, we have played some attractive football, but on the other hand there has been some dreadful dross in there. And playing "on the break" at home to sides like Birmingham? Give us a break.
If Sven is off as it would seem he surely is, yes he's been treated harhly. Is he the Messiah? Certainly not.
Keysey (13/05/2008 at 11:46)
The message boards were full of rabid anti Shinawatra stuff. The pendulum has well and truely swung on that one, especially since Sunday, and the boards are full of people that weren't heard before but it's a bit difficult for the MEN to turn so quickly
DJ, Chorlton (13/05/2008 at 11:47)
Stability dictates that Sven should be given another transfer window and another season. But there are shortcomings highlighted here.
Ultimately I think Sven is a "chequebook" manager like Keegan. There are some managers who have the ability to coach a team regardless of the resources such as Scolari, Hiddink, Mourinho, Van Gaal. Sven is better suited to keeping a big club ticking over when it has already got to the top. Dragging a team up the league requires a level of competitiveness and drive that he doesn't have. If we can't get Mourinho (who I believe is tempted by the challenge and shouldn't laughed off as pie in the sky) then perhaps at this time in our progress we should be looking at the likes of Moyes or Hughes.
Big Mal, Manchester (13/05/2008 at 11:47)
Wayne, The Crown, Brisbane (13/05/2008 at 11:49)
StretfordBLUE, Virginia (13/05/2008 at 11:52)
big blumer, cheltenham (13/05/2008 at 11:52)
a)we wont get anyone with his knowlege,experience, contacts etc
b)with the time he had to build pre-season the signings were always gonna be hit and miss
c)the players that were here last season that have done well this season (ie. hart,richards,johnson) have done so im sure in response to svens qualities as a coach and a people person
d)given a proper pre-season and chance to build again i really think we could have kicked on......we need some perspective
i do want to say though that i DO think this is a good article and although im on the pro sven side of the fence i appreciate all the points made, there are 2 sides to every story and what is said by the journo here is fair enough and balanced.......i just wish the situation had been kept in house and not dealt with so in public it such an almost amateurish fashion with little clarification for the fans
bbcity Caboolture Australia (13/05/2008 at 11:52)