THIRTY minutes to the biggest speech in Gordon Brown's life, and the omens are not good.
Doleful-looking delegates sit in their seats and exchange whispered words.
Funk
A pitiful four balloons drift around the hall - batted away in irritation, not celebration. 'That's the Way I Like It' is blaring from the speakers, stuck on constant repeat. Funk for a party in a funk.
A Monty Python-style animation plays on a big screen, flashing up boasts of 12 years of Labour government.
Some raise a cheer: '44,000 more doctors', '2.4m children helped by Sure Start'. Some are just bizarre: 'Iconic modern Architecture', 'Wembley is the tallest covered stadium in the world'.
And then the star of last year's conference takes to the stage. Not Gordon, but his wife, Sarah. In 2008 she helped convince the nation that her husband was not just a politician, but a human being.
Now, though, the nation sees her differently. Not just as a loyal wife, but as a player in the game. She is impressive again in paying tribute to her 'hero'; but she cannot pull off the same magic trick twice.
Then Gordon appears. He looks, and sounds, perfectly calm. But his face betrays the pressure he is under. He offers a few half-hearted jokes, then attacks the Tories on Labour's strongest ground: their handling of the banking crisis.
"The Conservative party were faced with the economic call of the century - and they called it wrong," he thunders. The party is roused. But this is not to be a Tory-bashing speech. On the contrary. It is to be the most policy-heavy leader's address in recent conference history.
The pledges come thick and fast. A vote on proportional representation. The right to recall dodgy MPs. Scrapping hereditary peers within a year. Free childcare for 250,000 under-twos. Cancer diagnosis in a week. Even 'supervised homes' for teenage mothers.
When he mentions Palestine you half expect him to promise to sort that out 'in the current financial year', too. He finishes by beseeching his party to 'dream big dreams' - to 'fight, and win, and serve'. It gets a good, if not ecstatic response.
Nation
In truth, it is a speech for the nation, rather than the party. It is the right kind of speech, too: one which attempts to grab headlines with policies rather than personalities, and which attempts to turn the election into a choice about the future, not the past.
But there are so many policies that even the Labour delegates struggle to see the sense behind them all. It all feels a bit chaotic; it is hard not to come away with the impression that Mr Brown is a man who knows he has too much to do, and very little time.
Tweet
David Ottewell on Brown's biggest speech
September 30, 2009
COMMENT: Chief reporter David Ottewell

Showing comments 1 to 21 and replies | View All
Deejay, Bury (30/09/2009 at 07:51)
I don't believe any political party is right for this country, as they are all tainted and inflexible. However, Labour had it's chance, flunked it and has left this country with a worse debt than Germany in the mid 1920's.
The most comical bit was watching all his ministers stand up and half-heartedly clap, and then spotting the BBC camera on them suddenly break out into grins and hearty applause.
selfexiled (30/09/2009 at 08:19)
The end is nigh Brown and co get your bags packed.
That bit of fluff, under the sofa (30/09/2009 at 08:28)
Isn't this the same outfit who attempted to destroy Manchester? How does Ottewell feel about his beloved Labour coo-cooing the Republican Terrorists?
Labour will soon be gone.
Angie33 , Manchester (30/09/2009 at 08:36)
Horatio Dogsbody, Flixton (30/09/2009 at 09:44)
By the way - Alternative vote is not proportional representation, it just returns a single, least disliked, member to represent a given area.
Jay B, oldham (30/09/2009 at 09:56)
The JAYB Party.
I'll scrap benefits completely. you get 6 months assistance grant if you're made unemployed to help you get back to work. after that you get nothing. if you want to do nothing then you get nothing!
Disability grants will be like benefits but you only get them if you actually work or do something in the community.
child benefits will be scrapped. you will get free child care till they go to school but you can only be eligable for it over 21s. if you decide to have kids any younger then thats fine. but you need to be financially stable to do so. either that or get help from your parents.
also that gives young people the incentive to either go get a job or further education instead of the "i'll have a kid its financiall better" idea.
numbers of mirgrant workers to be capped, and they will have to work a minimum of a year before being entitled to any assistance in availiable.
all those savings i've made will then be ploughed into the police service, nhs and public transport system to give everybody the services they expect from the taxes they pay.
and also pay off a massive amount of debt gordons plundered us into.
now who's gonna vote for me next general election?
any other ideas would be also apreciated!
Squire of Newton, Newton nr. Hyde (30/09/2009 at 10:07)
Ran Droid, Manchester (30/09/2009 at 10:11)
On the plus side, the Labour party are technically insolvent and struggling to pay back loans, so the expense of a general election should see them excised from the body politic like the cancer they are.
Maybe then we'll get a real working class party, instead of one dedicated only to the unions and special interest groups.
Almighty God, Salford (30/09/2009 at 11:12)
Laura Norder, Didsbury (30/09/2009 at 12:25)
Yep. Voters - in their droves - will be voting for someone that will spend nothing on education... because the party leader obviously didn't have one.
Do you read what you type? Has your 'party' outlawed capital letters?
The electorate awaits your pearls of wisdom with baited breath - or maybe not.
That bit of fluff, under the sofa (30/09/2009 at 12:42)
How could you be so critical about anybody when your lot have got Prescott?
Jay B, oldham (30/09/2009 at 13:59)
i am well educated. i wonder if you are with your petty name calling it seems like its actually you who's still in education resorting to playgound bullying.
grown up!!
Laura Norder, Didsbury (30/09/2009 at 15:00)
Nope, still not got it, have you?
Back to the remedial class, boy.
And I seem to recall you espousing the merits of the BNP in another post... so your opinion - on anything - is worthless.
And 'Fluffy' is only upset 'cos his wife can't retire.
Typical Tory: it's all 'me, me, me,' with you lot.
Back in your box!
Mark,Radcliffe. (30/09/2009 at 15:19)
Ran Droid, Manchester (30/09/2009 at 15:20)
If you find people who find merit in the BNP worthless, does that then include Labour who have twice filched BNP policies for themselves?
Jay B, oldham (30/09/2009 at 15:36)
anyway. this isnt an essay. its a comments page. who needs capitals.
i dont support anyone yet. i just agree with some points some partys have come up with.
all except your beloved labour party who have nothing else left to give.
just like yourself, nothing constructive to give.
i predict the next reaction from yourself will include much the same.
simon clark, lancashire (30/09/2009 at 16:01)
Ran Droid, Manchester (30/09/2009 at 17:07)
Sir, my cap is doffed.
Jay B, oldham (30/09/2009 at 17:25)
exactly. unfortunately its the "all" or at least the majority who are hard working middle income people (i say people and not families there gordon btw, he uses that alot and means nothing) feel let down with labour and the last 13 years.
simon clark, lancashire (30/09/2009 at 18:10)
castlefieldres, manchester (30/09/2009 at 19:02)
Continual posts in a Beavis and Butthead theme, all juvenile insults.
I'm quite sure she's very proud of herself each time she insults someone.
No doubt she'll cut and past this and then have a pop at me.
Laura, if it makes you feel better about yourself go right ahead.
The people on this site who receive your insults are probably, in turn, saving the nhs a fortune on another kind of therapy for your attention issues.