A BRITISH TELECOM boss today said sorry for the devastation wreaked by the phone cable fire still costing Greater Manchester businesses £4.5m a day.
But, with 110,000 phone lines still out and the cost of the chaos to the area's economy reaching a staggering £10m, BT still refused to talk about compensation.
BT Wholesale chief executive Paul Reynolds was called to account today by the M.E.N. after angry business leaders, MPs and families demanded answers on how such a small fire could cause such chaos.
The boss of the BT wing providing services for businesses made an apology to customers and said all services should be restored within the 72 hours.
Mr Reynolds said: "It is a big regret that thousands of communities have been affected - it must be dreadful for them and I understand why they are asking questions.
"The impact on families and businesses caused by Monday's fire in our deep tunnel under the city centre is unprecedented.
"All I can say is that we have been working flat out to get services back as quickly as we can.
"There are only 1,500 customers with no service at all.
"If someone had said to me that this fire could happen, I would not have been surprised about the number of cables affected, but I never expected this to happen."
Neither did thousands of people in Greater Manchester and beyond who have had their phone lines, e-mail, fax and payment systems wiped out by the fire.
Coun Richard Leese, leader of Manchester city council, now wants answers.
Disruption
He said: "There are two issues - the disruption to business and to people's everyday lives, and also the fact that people were working down there from time to time and there must be an issue about whether it was safe.
"The question is what was their Plan B if something like this happened, andthey do not appear to have had one."
Today Mr Reynolds admitted that there had never been a "Plan B" network of cables because of the enormous cost of duplicating the hundreds of thousands of cables in the tunnels.
He said: "There is a back-up to re-route traffic using network management systems. But to build two of the same systems is simply not cost-effective."
BT's tunnels were prepared, however, for any fire and were fitted with various fire prevention measures including fire walls, alarms, fire stops, dampeners, fire doors, fire retardent materials and systems to limit air intake to the tunnels.
The tunnels are not fitted with halon gas to suck oxygen out of the tunnels to quell any fire, because any workers in the tunnel in the event of a fire would die.
Mr Reynolds has refused to talk about compensation.
How were you affected by the meltdown?
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
katie, Gorton - Manchester (31/03/2004 at 12:23)
iain parker, prestwich (31/03/2004 at 13:25)
Iain Dickinson, Offerton, Stockport (31/03/2004 at 13:32)
Ah, the wonders of modern technology eh?
PAULA, OLDHAM (31/03/2004 at 15:10)
I leave you with this:
To err is human, To forgive is devine. Maybe more people should think on.
David Siddall, Manchester (31/03/2004 at 15:40)
"There is a back-up to re-route traffic using network management systems. But to build two of the same systems is simply not cost-effective."
The past few days, totally goes against there resent TV advertisements which stats come back to BT....... "You would go down to use the phone and there would be nothing, you could be left without a phone for hours" so come back to BT.
My feelings are to keep putting pressure on BT for compensation, and change from BT to a different service provider and get rid of BT altogether. I am not with BT never have been never will, and I could ring out as normal, but the offices above me and below me could not as they were on BTs network.
Andrew Markham, London (31/03/2004 at 15:46)
Sarah, Hulme (31/03/2004 at 15:46)
James, Poynton (31/03/2004 at 15:51)
Chris, Macclesfield (31/03/2004 at 16:04)
Kelly Howell, Clayton, Manchester (31/03/2004 at 16:19)
The biggest shock has been the fact that we are expected to pay line rental for the pleasure of not being able to use the phone because they couldn't be bothered putting in a back-up system
Deborah, Manchester (31/03/2004 at 16:34)
If something is the "life and blood" of the company, surely they should rely on one provider, without the aid of a safety net?
Geoff, Gorton (31/03/2004 at 16:59)
Tony Hoyle, Stockport, Manchester (31/03/2004 at 17:09)
The rates are:
1-3 days delay: equivalent to one month line rental
4-6 days delay: equivalent to two months line rental
7-9 days delay: equivalent to three months line rental
10 days plus delay: equivalent to four months line rental.
Unfortunately only for voice line, not for data.
See http://www.bt.com/customerservices/downloads/cust_service_guarantee.pdf
MAGGIE, MANCHESTER (31/03/2004 at 18:10)
AND GIVEN SOME INFORMATION WHEN WE WILL BE UP AND RUNNING?
Bryan Capes, STOCKPORT (31/03/2004 at 18:32)
Chris Quick, Milton Keynes (31/03/2004 at 19:07)
Tyler Kennedy, Buxton (31/03/2004 at 19:25)
Chris Judge, Whaley Bridge, High Peak. (31/03/2004 at 20:21)
The consequences of that business decision, must surely be that they are responsible for the disruption caused to their paying customers. And one months line rental for the loss of three days voiceline, broadband, fax and mobile is woefully inedaequate.
T. Hawkins, Swinton, Gtr. Manchester (31/03/2004 at 21:38)
Stuart Law, Stockport (31/03/2004 at 21:44)
I think BT should now
be pro-actively talking about the large compensation they are going to give to businesses damaged by this failure to plan and if not then all 130,000 clients affected should join a class-action to obtain a suitable outcome in compensation and damages.
Their failure to provide what they admit would be an expensive backup system and instead line their pockets and that of shareholders is a prime example of corporate greed and we will not pay for it in the damage to our businesses or in the lives threatened by such failure to deliver an important public service.
Stuart Law
Chief Executive
Brandnetics Ltd
0161 456 3000 (or it would be normally)
Joe, Cheadle (01/04/2004 at 01:11)
Lee Taylor, Stockport (01/04/2004 at 03:03)
Spoke to BT last night who were abrupt and un-helpful. Their website for information is a joke, when the BBC news site offers more details.
They have offered NO compensation, NO alternative Internet access other than Dial up at nearly B#30 a day.
Why have BT not offered Internet Broadband users, FREE tempory migration to their 'AnyTime' package in the interim.
The Twin Towers affected 5 million lines, and most of them were back up in 3 days. Wheres BT's emergency planning.
Are they prepared for a Terror attack on our communications system, obviously NOT.
There was a documentary on 9/11 on BBC a few months ago, and the speed they diverted calls and re-laid fibre pipe was 100x faster than out BT.
They have some explaining to do.!!!!!
I have had to sign up for NTL dial-up today at B#10 per month to be able to carry on working at home. BT should be offering alternatives for FREE !!!!
Lee Taylor, Stockport (01/04/2004 at 03:07)
WHY Prestbury when the City Centre should be the priority...
WONDER which Managing Director lives in Prestubury !!! or is it the Chairman !!!!
Denise, Stockport (01/04/2004 at 10:26)
T. Hawkins, Swinton, Gtr. Manchester (01/04/2004 at 14:20)