It might have helped if we were told the full truth about the overdose; it was co-proxamaol - paracetamol and a codeine-like drug. Codeine and its relations are opiates; opiate poisoning was the preferred MO of a certain dr Shipman.

This mustn't be doing his family any good. Whether he did kill himself or he didn't, it still stinks to high heaven. Someone is accountable. I think it's the Government.

No, I don't believe Dr Kelly killed himself.
After having spent some time in Northern Ireland (read into that what you like), I am fully aware of the UK Government 'dirty tricks', involving clandestine operatives.

Isn't it obvious by now? Its the same with 9/11 and 7/7
People are finally starting to wake up to the truth and no longer believe the lies spun by Goverment and the controlled media

The true controversy is over how the Hutton Inquiry supplanted the process of the Coroner's Inquest, commencing instead on the basis of an assumed premise for Dr David Kelly cause of death and then, without sound investigation or due legal process, inappropriately coming to a finding that his death was suicide, whilst deflecting national attention with the shenanigans between Downing Street and the BBC.

It was Mr Blair who called for an urgent inquiry into the death of Dr David Kelly. It was the findings of this inquiry which ultimately supplanted the process of the coroners inquest. Dr Kelly is the only British citizen who has been a single victim of an incident resulting their sudden death and yet not had a coroners inquest return a verdict.

The Hutton inquiry was not the appropriate means by which to conclude the cause of Dr Kelly's death. Lord Hutton's remit was to 'urgently' examine the 'circumstances surrounding' the death of Dr Kelly. An inquiry of this type usually relates to an incident - such as a rail disaster - where individual's cause of death is not so much at question but rather to question the cause of the incident itself. The terms of reference given to Lord Hutton are no wider in their scope.

The coroner, Nicholas Gardiner, should have been allowed to concluded his inquest before the Hutton inquiry commenced. Failing this the coroner should not have subsequently waited for Lord Hutton's findings. His delay in reconvening the coroners inquest anticipated Lord Hutton may drawn a conclusion in his report as to the probable cause of death. Lord Hutton should not have attempted to draw a conclusion as to the cause of death as this was outside of his remit and the "rigours that are normally undertaken at a coroner's inquest simply were not fulfilled" (I quote coroner Dr Michael Powers).

Nothing obvious was to be gained by so very 'urgently' commencing Lord Hutton's inquiry. Indeed it was inappropriate to have urgently commenced the inquiry without the coroner having first confirmed how Dr Kelly died. From the outset this was a prejudicial conclusion of the Hutton inquiry. An inquest's verdict of suicide and murder has to be established beyond reasonable doubt. If the coroner had returned an open verdict the thrust of the Hutton inquiry would have been wholly different or perhaps not occurred at all.

on its own it would be hard to say or prove but with the other major crimes like 9/11 7/7 Bali bomb and the constant trend through history of false flag
operations to influence populations and war. Add it to those and its apparent its just another state sponsored crime.

It was obvious from the start that Dr Kelly was assassinated on orders from government, where criminals were afraid that their lies would be exposed by somebody they could not dismiss as a crank.

Dr David Kelly did NOT kill himself. Anyone who entertains this idea for one moment must also believe that this current 'government' of Tony Blair is pure lily white. The only thing white about this corrupt 'government' is the white in whitewashes. This government has produced more WHITEWASHES than most people have had hot dinners! The whitepaper on the "dodgy dossier", then Lord Hutton's report, followed by Lord Butler's report, and the latest, Lord Stevens' report which also has many unanswered questions and issues as well as 18 valid witnesses who were never interviewed despite their having come forward of their own accord. This is the most corrupt 'government' in the past century if not in all of British history. It stinks to the highest echelons. Please pass the air freshener.

I read that there was very little blood loss, also the particular artery supposedly cut, would have curled up immediately. I also read that the post mortem revealed only a few tablets, not enough to overdose on. His body had been suspiciously been moved too, not ringing true so far? He was also looking forward to revealing no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He was a loving husband and father, don't make me laugh. He was killed by people who had a lot to lose by his findings, and this so called pressure was no big deal to a man in his position.

Mr David Kelly is a Scientist, a man of knowledge & Wisdom,people like him do not commit suicide, I do not believe he killed himself,

I don't think Kelly killed himself.

Of course David Kelly didn't commit suicide! Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows this.
Governments are run by Liars, and should NEVER be believed!!!

I do not believe abd never have believed David Kelly committed suicide. His death bears all the hallmarks of an official killing.

NO Dr. Kelly most certainly did NOT kill himself.

If Dr Kelly killed himself I don't think it was for the reasons so far given. He was portrayed as being a hawk on the weapons issue, in reality he too may have believed that there was nothing of consequence there to be found. If he had been lying (to Panorama etc) to support the Government case I think he would have felt far more guilty than for being caught out by the Foreign Affairs committee about speaking to members of the media. All of that would have blown over in any case. The Hutton Inquiry did not publish many of the witness statements which were submitted to TVP, these may shine significant light on to the question of what Dr Kelly truly believed about the status of Saddam's weaponry. Without this knowledge we cannot determine Dr Kelly's true thoughts at the time, and therefore his personal state of mind.

Of course David Kelly did not kill himself. The suggestion, for that is all it is, is quite ludicrous in the circumstances.

I would, however, be quite happy to hear from anyone who does believe that he did.

I have a very nice beachfront property, in the centre of Aylesbury, that I'm looking to sell.

It is rediculous to suggest that Dr Kelly killed himself. Anyone who has read the real information surrounding this story would realise that it was almost impossible for him to die from the cuts he apparently inflicted on himself.
Also, his body was apparently moved after death.... and nobody is asking "by whom". There are several parts of this story which have been simply ignored by the establishment and media. In fact, when the "inquiry" took place, there was no investigation into whether he killed himself or not... the only question was "did the BBC cause us to go to war?".

I think we have just found the type of person mentioned that prefers to believe in vast convoluted conspiracies of their own governments rather than the blindingly obvious facts.

That David Kelly killed himself is sad but true.

That Saddam Hussein wanted everyone to believe he did have WMD was part of his brinkmanship and the support from the Western 'anti-war' coalition without any doubt bolstered his feelings of untouchability on that. And it has since been proven when his own generals asked for the weapons on the eve of invasion.

But no it cannot have been Saddams' fascistic regime at fault. Or Kellys own erm 'unusual' beliefs and personal conflicts that were really responsible for his highly disturbed mind and hence his sad suicide.

I'm only surprised none of these schmos above have tried to blame Mossad yet.

Just another one of the many "conspiracy theories" that seem to follow Bush and Blair like shadows. I'm sure none of it is true. "Nothing to see here, move along. the police will

Poor Dr Kelly is the ONLY person in the history of england since the coroner system was started who has his manner of death recorded as severing of the ulnar Artery, anyone with half a brain and a rudimentary knowledge of human anatomy can see that killing yourself in this manner with a blunt knife such as the one found conveniently next to Dr Kelly is not only impossible but also would have been excruciatingly painful as the ulnar artery is buried in tendon and muscle.

yes been saying he was murdered by government agents for a long time.

thames valley police had a tactical operation running the day he died codenamed "Operation Mason". say no more! try googling "operation mason" for more information.

Of course he didn't kill himself. How obvious does a political assassination have to be, for goodness sake?

In line with the other 20 odd suspicious microbiologists deaths he most certainly did not commit suicide. Strength is added to this belief with direct personal experience of being a probable victim of an attempted MOD "accident". Or was it just a warning?

Never mind all the 'evidence'of an impossible to commit suicide in this manner etc...
like many conspiracy theories it collapses at the most basic , fundamental question.
Why did a government want to kill a person who was current news, therfore attracting MORE interst in thier activities, not less , and bringing the whole spectre of why is this war fought more powerfully into the spotlight.
Why ?
kill him and make everyone ask questions , have an official enquiry , bring the debate up again and again.. how does this help the autorities.
In fact dr kelly's death was the absolubte opposite of what the Government wanted , which was the story to go away , not run on and on.

Why kill him , it makes no sense.
They were already discrediting and spinning against him.
Kill him and now he's a martyr
discredit him and he's just a fool...