COUNCIL bosses gathered for a key meeting to debate congestion on Manchester's roads yesterday - and ALL of them travelled by car.
Members of the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities met up to approve plans for a pay-as-you-drive scheme which is aimed at reducing traffic on busy commuter routes.
But even though their meeting was held at Bury Town Hall - 100 yards from the town's bus and Metrolink interchange - not one of the council leaders bothered to use public transport.
The M.E.N. monitored the travel arrangements of 12 senior councillors and officials to see if they were setting an example to other motorists by giving up their cars.
Every one of them chose to drive through morning rush hour traffic and then park in a council-owned pay and display car park opposite the town hall.
It also emerged that all of them were exempt from the é3.50 parking charge - which is the equivalent to the cost of a Metrolink return ticket between Manchester and Bury. The meeting of the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (AGMA) was attended by leaders of all 10 local authorities in the region as well as other senior councillors.
Debate
It was their first opportunity to debate plans for a congestion charge, which were revealed exclusively by the M.E.N. earlier this week.
Leading the convoy of councillors was Coun Roger Jones, who is chairman of Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority, and arrived for the meeting in a black five-series BMW.
He defended his choice of transport, saying: "I am no different to any other motorist."
Sir Richard Leese, Manchester's council leader, and the city's chief executive, Sir Howard Bernstein, were both dropped off in the council's chauffeur-driven car, which waited in the car park on Knowsley Street until the meeting ended.
The M.E.N. approached 12 council chiefs who attended the meeting to ask why they chose to add to the congestion on Greater Manchester's roads during the morning rush hour. The excuses they gave ranged from family commitments, rush-hour public transport congestion and afternoon meetings, to the complexities of the journeys involved. Some said Manchester's public transport system was simply not good enough. The AGMA meeting started at 10am but most arrived early for both Labour and Liberal Democrat party meetings at 9am. At the end of the two-hour meeting members voted unanimously for detailed plans to be drawn up for congestion charging and presented to the government by July in a bid to win millions of pounds for public transport improvements.
Edmund King, executive director of the RAC Foundation, said he was surprised that none of the council leaders thought to give up their cars to travel to the meeting.
Example
He said: "This is certainly not setting a good example and it does smack of hypocrisy.
"The irony of these congestion charging schemes is that it is people like council leaders who will continue to drive because they can afford it. Whatever people say about Ken Livingstone, he does use the underground to get to work every day. Perhaps these politicians ought to have a word with Ken and take note of that because at least he does practise what he preaches on congestion charging.
"This is a very tough political decision and it isn't easy but they are getting off on the wrong foot. They should be leading by example and showing people that there are other ways of getting around Manchester."
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
PW, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 09:45)
Bystander, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 10:38)
Mike N, Deansgate (27/01/2007 at 10:49)
No need for a car if you live in the City
Pete, manchester (27/01/2007 at 11:09)
Harold Stephenson, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 11:35)
Katrina, Stockport (27/01/2007 at 11:45)
Rachel Allen, Salford (27/01/2007 at 11:45)
What a mug I now feel braving public transport each morning when these loonies getto work warm and dry in their people carriers and have the cheak to tell me that I shouldn't bother driving and 'put up' with dirty, crowded, late trams trains and buses that don't go anywhere near my house or my workplace.
Ace Riley, manchester (27/01/2007 at 11:50)
Thomas The Tank, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 13:14)
staffo, ardwick green (27/01/2007 at 13:28)
Northern Monkey, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 13:40)
we should all use public transport or pay charges to drive actually try and get to work by public transport and then they will see why most people drive. Where i work i am the only person out of 30 who uses public transport.The public transport in Manchester is a joke its dirty,exspensive and overcrowded.The amount of buses that i see driving around with OUT OF SERVICE on them is unreal.The amount of times i see hundreds of people standing at metrolink stops waiting for the met to turn up as another 15 min delay flashes at the station.Why has one of the fastest growing cities in the world got such rubbish transport system? Why does the metrolink not go to the trafford centre,oldham,rochdale,sale,bolton,chorlton,didsbury,stockport?how many cars would those lines take of the road?And why dont we enforce a policy that people must walk there kids to school or get on a school bus.This would reduce the amount of car journeys by millions.I suspect we cant upgrade our transport because we are a northern city and london gets everything.Why dont they introduce a lottery game to fund our transport system?We should organise a day whan everyone leaves there cars at home and uses public transport and when everyone turns up for work an hour or two late as the public transport system grinds to a holt we might of got the point through that we cant use something we dont have.
p mitchell, manchester (27/01/2007 at 13:48)
Ezz, Horwich (27/01/2007 at 14:12)
I am in favour of a congestion charge but let's make sure it applies to everybody.
ged, salford6 (27/01/2007 at 15:06)
Joey, Ashton under Lyne (27/01/2007 at 15:29)
How will charging me 6 quid to go from Ashton to Oldham by car (4 buses an hour no train service) help the city?
Had enough, Walkden (27/01/2007 at 15:46)
Stephen Granville, Crumpsall (27/01/2007 at 15:47)
p mitchell, manchester (27/01/2007 at 16:33)
metro-stations,at the moment if a reporter came around old-trafford[ex-warick rd near the cricket ground between 50-60 cars are parked every day[mon-friday] sat morning nilso this mean 20 or30 times more
when congestion comes into affect,the same i am sure at all other stations along the metro line
Ace Riley, manchester (27/01/2007 at 16:35)
LEAD BY EXAMPLE all the councillors aned council workers should use public transport to get to their place of work.LIKE THEY EXPECT OTHERS TO DO? Just because its a council meeting in the centre of manchester shouldnt exempt.
PW, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 17:42)
Ace Riley, manchester (27/01/2007 at 18:07)
Mr H, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 18:31)
Steve, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 18:41)
Steve, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 22:48)
To those who are talking about voting out the bosses - remember that Sir Howard is not elected but has plenty on his mind as a member of the London Olympics Committee.
J K, Manchester (27/01/2007 at 22:57)
Looking after No1. is obviously his main prioroty and that of many other labour councillors too. This is coming from a lifetime labour voter, who has had enough of the 'I'm alright Jack' labour party in Manchester, and is labour NO MORE!