POVERTY is "scarring" British cities, with around half of children in some urban areas living below the breadline, figures indicated today.
To coincide with a day of action on child poverty, Save the Children has released a list of constituencies with the worst rates of child poverty in the UK.
Inner city areas top the list - which was compiled using data from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation - with more than half of children in Manchester Central described as living in poverty.
Liverpool Riverside and Poplar and Canning Town - second and third in the list - showed child poverty rates approaching the 50 per cent mark, double the national average.
Colette Marshall, UK director of Save the Children, said: "Despite the boom in affluence, illustrated by ever-rising house prices, these figures show that cities remain the places most scarred by poverty.
"Families are struggling to cope - especially during winter when the weather turns cold and the bills are high and the financial demands on families become unbearable."
Urgent
"Without urgent action this year the government will fail to meet its own target to end child poverty by 2020."
Save the Children is calling on the Government to introduce seasonal grants to help families at the most difficult times of the year.
The charity estimated that the additional handouts would lift 440,000 children out of poverty.
Louise Ellman, MP for Liverpool Riverside, said: "Seven hundred thousand children have been lifted out of relative poverty since 1997 but it is clear that much more needs to be done.
"We must expand opportunities for education and training and ensure families and children do not fall below the breadline.
"The government must keep their commitment to eradicating child poverty by 2020."
Figures showed that in both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's constituencies, just under a quarter of children are living in poverty, in line with the national average.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet
Half of Manchester's children 'live in poverty'
January 17, 2007

Showing comments 1 to 15 and replies | View All
Al Capone, Atherton (18/01/2007 at 07:16)
Ace Riley, manchester (18/01/2007 at 09:27)
Bus Commuter, Manchester (18/01/2007 at 11:06)
Ace Riley, manchester (18/01/2007 at 11:24)
Poverty is when a system promotes a certain level of living and then pulls the rug from under those people to maintain that level of living,those people struggle to pay their way or even live to the level that was set by a system or government? This makes money for the ruling classes to maintain their own levels of luxury at the cost of others.We have pensioners who have struggled to pay for a pension so that they can retire.Instead we have people putting extra clothing on to keep warm without it costing them any extra?And we have people who are told to eat better for our health ,but some find it hard to pay for better quality food for their kids.The people who run our glorious country tell us to buy healthy food but on the other hand promote our kids to buy garbage (brainwashing to keep the rich richer). At least in third world countrys they are at rock bottom and have nothing but we have had employment and are told to buy bigger houses and electrical goods and other luxury goods and then the system takes our jobs away so what are we left with? all the bills and the money to pay back and if we dont we are make to look like social outcasts ?
Charlie Chadderton, Chadderton (18/01/2007 at 11:46)
Laugh Out Loud, Budapest (18/01/2007 at 13:11)
Rebecca, MIDDLETON (18/01/2007 at 13:37)
Ace Riley, manchester (18/01/2007 at 13:38)
Sorry mate but people in the third world have radios and computers at hand ? so are they not living in poverty?You cannot measure poverty on computers and TVs.In fact they have been selling wind up radios for a few years now to the third world and last year wind up computers at less tha $100 about sixty pounds and some are actually given free?So dont be fooled by electrical goods that people have.
Andy, Wythenshawe (18/01/2007 at 18:00)
The last defination i saw was when the houshold was receiving an income less than 70% of the national average. Poverty is relative, there are certainly estates that have become an 'under class' totally alienated from the rest of societies wealth and prosperity.
Newsnut, Chadderton (19/01/2007 at 02:39)
Alibasta Codafie, Knustford (19/01/2007 at 10:46)
OAP, Swinton (19/01/2007 at 10:48)
Louise, Ashton (19/01/2007 at 14:49)
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (19/01/2007 at 15:31)
lesley, usa (19/01/2007 at 20:17)