Devices such as exclusive 3G phones, MP3 players and mobile email receivers are fuelling a dramatic new surge in street robberies and other thefts.
A Press Association survey of crime data across England, Wales and Northern Ireland showed theft of electronic gadgets rose 9% year-on-year.
There was a 5.5% increase compared with 2001/02 across 17 police forces which responded to requests under the Freedom of Information Act, up from 56,414 to 59,433.
There were more than 1,000 more such crimes last year than the previous peak in 2002/03, the survey showed.
In London, there was a 13% rise in the 12 months to the end of October compared with the previous year.
The Metropolitan Police said 32,992 mobiles and 1,688 gadgets such as MP3 players and mobile email devices were stolen.
In comparison with 2001/02, the capital's total for last year was up by just over 4% (34,234 versus 32,869).
London's total was the highest number on record and 19% up on its low point of about 29,000 such crimes in 2003/04.
Theft of MP3s such as iPods and other expensive devices such as Blackberrys rose from 446 to 1,242 in the capital year-on-year, a staggering 178% leap.
Other forces reporting a significant jump in thefts of electronics and phones included:
:: Kent - which saw 2001/02's total of 317 thefts rocket to 977 in the most recent 12 months, a rise of 208%;
:: Bedfordshire - a rise from 894 in 2001/02 to 1,257, a 41% increase;
:: Humberside - up 22% year-on-year with 1,237 thefts, and 34% up on 2001/02.
Some forces appeared to be achieving good results on keeping thefts down.
Cleveland's total of 184 thefts was far below the 2002 high of 398.
And West Yorkshire's total of 3,049 was nearly 1,300 below the 2002/03 figure - although the force was not included in overall totals because it could not provide 2001/02 results.
Figures published by the Home Office in July showed that in 2006/06, police recorded 98,204 robberies - of all kinds, not just electronics - an 8% rise compared with 90,747 the previous year.
It was the first rise since Mr Blair introduced the street crime initiative in 2001.
Also in July, separate data from the British Crime Survey (BCS) said robbery rose by 22% to 311,000 in the year, its highest level for four years.
The rise was blamed on street thefts of electronic equipment, and today's findings appear to back up that claim. Tweet

Comments
Login or Register to comment
Interesting. Yet what about the numbers not reported ?
Blairs street crime crackdown sounds good, though I think, we'll find it's lip service.
Tough on crime and the causes ? Look in your own back yard at the New Deal system and ask yourself, is it any wonder ?
News at ten???
TONY BLAIR HARD ON CRIME??
Crime is on the decline?
We have more murders,more muggins,more,car crime,more credit card fraud,The only growth industry we have in britain IS CRIME.So yes the labour party is the party of growth ,but its in crime ??
Bit difficult for him to 'personally' launch Labour's street crime crackdown isn't it, what with him constantly on holiday.
I've got to ask the question, why do MPs get so many holidays nowadays - 100 years ago I could understand it, travel was either by a 30mph train (speedy for its day), or by coach and horses; nowadays we have cars, trains (although granted most of them do seem to run at slightly less than their Victorian predecessors) and planes.
There is no reason whatsoever that MPs should get so many holidays and, as a consequence, be constantly away from Westminster. Other public servants don't get these kind of holidays.
Tony Blair is just desperate for another soundbite with his latest 'crackdown'. Got to tell you Tone, we're sick of the sight and sound of you!
When will anybody listen?
To combat crime
Poor driving
Speeding
Etc etc
YOU NEED POLICE ON THE STREETS
Crime could be up because of the overpriced insurance on mobile phones. The only cover you get is for your phone to be stolen by force. Hence if you lose it you are not covered so to get a replacement you make up the crime to fit the insurance claim, result crime increases, simple.