News

Corrie loses 'ethnic' vote

CORONATION Street is a turn-off for ethnic minority viewers, according to a three-year academic study.

Despite prominent characters such as shop boss Dev and Sunita appearing in recent years, researchers found the long-running soap was of "little interest" to ethnic minorities.

There was a "marked disinterest" in it, especially on the part of viewers with Indian and Pakistani backgrounds, researchers found.

The national study was carried out by Manchester University and the Open University for the British Film Institute, which promotes understanding and appreciation of Britain's film and television heritage and culture.

The report looks at how factors such as ethnicity, class, age and education affect TV and film viewing.

Researchers quizzed 227 people from the country's three biggest ethnic groups, Indian, Pakistani and Afro-Caribbean.

It suggested people from ethnic minority backgrounds preferred EastEnders to other soaps.

Animosity

Prof Tony Bennett, from the Open University, said: "We did not ask people if they disliked a programme. We asked what their favourite three programmes were. All we know is Coronation Street was not listed. It does not mean there is animosity towards it.

"I know full well Coronation Street has a rich history for wanting to engage and reflect society."

In mainstream dramas, The Bill was very popular with all three ethnic groups, BBC1 was favoured by people with an Indian background, and Afro- Caribbeans and Pakistanis preferred Five.

A Corrie spokeswoman said: "Coronation Street has always had a broad appeal and strives to give a true representation of northern life while not losing sight of the fact it is a drama whose main remit is to entertain. It is still the most watched show on TV."

Comments

Login or Register to comment

So what?

Report This Reply

so what - theres loads of white people who dont give a damm about coronation street

Report This Reply

so what? what a ridiculous survey. Corrie is a load of rubbish to any right minded person. most TV these days is aimed at the brain dead.

Report This Reply

What was behind this survey?? no doubt something political? who cares who watches what soap?why do people try and make a point out of nothing??the soap is of little interest to a lot of people chineese,jamaican,african,Ect so why make a issue about asians "YET AGAIN"

Report This Reply

HOW MUCH HAS THIS THREE YEAR ACADEMIC STUDY INTO CORONATION STREET COST THE TAXPAYER .ABSOLUTELY, RIDICULOUS

Report This Reply

Ironic because Corrie's obsession with P.C. in the form of gays and ethnic themes made me stop watching it years ago.

Report This Reply

A study to show that they don't watch boring, trashy, sex/drug filled soap operas?Perhaps they'll indulge in a study to show that people of Bangladeshi and Pakistani origin do not get blind drunk on a Saturday night and vomit on pavements or that they are less likely to purchase ugly, skimpy clothing or indulge in sex against walls after a night out. Are we supposed to think this is in any way a bad thing?

Report This Reply

i can't even balieve this study has been conducted, it doesn't matter what race you are if you had any sense you would do something more constructive then watch any soaps! anyway what is tracy upto going back to charlie can't wait to find out heh heh

Report This Reply

No Dae they dont do all those things, nor do they race round in black Subarus or force women into arrange marriages or set fire to wives and children and so on...

Report This Reply

I totally agree with you there dae. This study was pointless and a waste of time. It took them three years to find out that ethnic minorities don't watch coronation street, i could have told them in 5seconds that no one watches coronation street! Don't these researchers have anything better to do!!!

Report This Reply

Why should a TV program from a private company be required by the state to attract any particular audience?

Report This Reply

Well I'm not from an ethnic minority, but to say it is of little interest to me would be an understatement.

Report This Reply