THE Manchester Evening News today launches a campaign to sort out the bus chaos crippling the heart of Manchester.
And commuters, business leaders and politicians are right behind us.
Dozens of empty buses blocked traffic in the city centre yet again yesterday as rival transport firms took their free-for-all battle for passengers into its third week. The bus wars broke out when UK North began running 12 services an hour on the Manchester to Chorlton route already served by Stagecoach.
It meant 30 buses trying to cram into the same bus stops every hour, causing massive tailbacks which brought the city centre to a standstill.
Passengers on Metrolink trams have been stuck for up to an hour. And some travellers have been forced to get off buses on the outskirts of the city centre and walk to their destination, while cars and lorries have also been caught in gridlock.
The council has been forced to issue parking tickets to buses waiting for more than two minutes, while the Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive has appealed to the Traffic Commissioner for a special order limiting services.
This order came into force this week, but yesterday there were still crippling jams caused by too many buses.
One reader complained his daughter took one and a half hours to get from Bury to Manchester by bus - and some workers had to abandon their cars in York Street.
Now the M.E.N. can reveal the government has drawn up plans to bring back regulation of bus services in cities including Manchester.
Action
A leaked memo from Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander suggests a new transport Bill could bring the buses back under the control of a regulator within two years.
The M.E.N. Get It Sorted team is now launching a drive for immediate action.
MPs Graham Stringer and Tony Lloyd, Lord Terry Thomas of Macclesfield, the Manchester Chamber of Commerce and the environmental think-tank Sustainability Northwest have all thrown their support behind plans to bring back regulation.
And scores of our readers have contacted the M.E.N. by post and email to register their dismay at the chaos which is affecting trams as well as buses.
GMPTE, which oversees the industry in the region, said "voluntary partnership with bus operators has not delivered nearly enough real improvements for passengers".
Its deputy director general, Geoff Inskip, said: "We need controls that would allow us to plan the whole network, including those bus services that may run at a loss but act as a lifeline for local communities." The cross-party Passenger Transport Authority is proposing a new approach, allowing it to enter into a binding partnership with bus operators that is structured to reward good practice and penalise poor performance.
Sustainability Northwest estimates that every 20 buses driving into central Manchester each day generate about one tonne of carbon dioxide.
"What is happening in central Manchester at the moment is tantamount to an environmental crime," said SNW's chief executive, Erik Bichard.
Engines
Environmental campaigner Lord Terry Thomas of Macclesfield said: "We must also insist on buses being powered by energy other than petrol - such as hybrid engines.
"And from talking to people in the government, I've also been given the distinct impression that something will be done about it in the near future."
Blackley MP Graham Stringer said: "I have reams of letters from people who have lost jobs and missed hospital appointments because the buses don't come.
"A regulated system could prevent situations where people have to travel through town to get from Moston to Blackley and be better for the environment."
Emma Antrobus, spokeswoman for Manchester Chamber of Commerce, said city centre businesses "were bearing the cost" of the extra congestion in delayed deliveries, late staff and fed-up shoppers.
Tony Lloyd, MP for Manchester Central, said: "Bus companies have licence to take people for a ride, but not in the way they have been doing for so long."
Gordon Reid, who heads the City Centre Management Company, said: "There is a strong lobby, to which we would subscribe, which feels the current situation is not ideal for a city like Manchester.
"London enjoys a different arrangement and we would welcome the opportunity to see a similar situation put in place here." Mark Threapleton, Stagecoach's Manchester managing director, said: "Undoing the successes of the deregulated market is an unnecessary, and hugely more expensive, way of achieving the objective of running better services.
"Our view is that the current legislation needs to be strengthened to enable public authorities to be more involved in how bus services are operated, and at the same time involving bus companies in the development of local priorities to ensure bus passengers receive the priority on Greater Manchester roads that they deserve."
It is believed discussions between Stagecoach, UK North, the city council and GMPTE have been stymied by competition laws which prevent firms discussing routes, timetables and fares.
Is re-regulation the answer? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
PW, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 08:58)
sprouty, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 09:16)
Tony Sullivan, Stockport (13/09/2006 at 09:28)
PW, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 09:31)
Nick, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 10:03)
Ken, Beswick (13/09/2006 at 10:11)
Surely those people who the MEN will be urging to do something don't need telling about this mess. If there is something that can be done, and there are people who can do it, why does it need a push from the MEN.
Beggers beleif that this goes on, I call on the council to stop mouthing off about what an exciting and vibrant City this is. WE CAN'T EVEN RUN A DECENT BUS SERVICE.
Mike S, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 10:15)
Kyla, Chorlton (13/09/2006 at 10:24)
PW, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 10:28)
Steve Robinson, Australia (13/09/2006 at 10:48)
Shunt all these private company's back to where they came from.
I visited the UK in 2004, tried the services offered, found them confusing and at best useless.
Mrs V Angry, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 11:33)
Sue, ashton (13/09/2006 at 11:45)
Drivers are rude, buses are filthy, smoking legal and illegal substances is allowed.
If you ring Stagecoach they come out with ridiculous statements such as "drivers cannot get out of their cabs due to their safety"What about passenger safety and comfort??
Also they are supposedly trial running smoke detectors!! When is that supposed to happen.
I spoke to the Hyde Rd depot months ago and nothing has changed
Jon, Chorlton (13/09/2006 at 12:11)
Stagecoach have been fleecing Chorlton residents for years!
Maddy, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 12:16)
unknown, salford (13/09/2006 at 12:58)
Peter McHale, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 13:11)
Vicky, Salford (13/09/2006 at 13:14)
Anon, Abbey Hey (13/09/2006 at 13:18)
ex-pat, London (13/09/2006 at 13:36)
Now then, when I was a nipper, the good old 170 and 169 (170 was orange and white and 169 what purple and white - is that right? such a long time ago...) used to run a reliable service. I remember the bus driver (might even have been Steve Robinson in Australia) used to have a sing-a-along. Chances of that are rare these days.
Then came along de-regulation and the "little Gems" and "Beeline Buzz Company".
We had GM Buses North, south etc too.
All was starting to look promising for the new boys.
Then mergers started and things went bad - fast. Ending up with Stagecoach buying up rivals.
Luckily for me, I soon left school and started to drive, so I wasn't affected as much by the chaos.
Circa 2000, the withington route into town was great, more than one bus a minute on a saturday night. Some would charge me 40p, others would try and extract ¿¿1 - for the same journey.
I now live in London where the council dictate the services (prices, routes, bus types, etc).
For just over a quid, I can go for miles and the buses are every ten minutes or less.
Whenever I return home and go visiting, I'm stuck. Try and get from Wilmslow to town, you've got no chance. Buses take years to arrive and cost the earth.
I would say that London has backfired on getting shut of the routemaster buses and bringing out the slower, congesting charged bendy-buses. But in comparison, Manchester's public transport system is a 'mare.
Also, if the council is running things, then they can ensure that more police are on the troublesome routes. I remember the 192 route between Longsight and Stockport used to be a troublespot that the police tried to tackle.
I say welcome back to the transportation system Manchester, having the council dictate the transport policy will mean a regular and affordable service in the area.
Now if only they could do the same with the networks and bring back British Rail and Inter-City.
But that's a dream for another day...
Tracey, Manchester (13/09/2006 at 13:52)
Gareth, Gorton (13/09/2006 at 13:54)
samual richards,, audenshaw (13/09/2006 at 14:36)
1stly it boils down to whom was there 1st down on all these massive bus queues 1st started after the metrolink was 1st introducedand picadilly gardens itself was reduced in size?
for a start theirs more than 14 different bus numbers that leave m/c and go to their destinations via princess st.whitworth st & oxford st directions.the bus stops in and around the metroling side of piccadilly gardens isnt big enough for 20 or more buses trying to be in the same bus stop place even if it means 1 bus parking next to the that is legally next to the bus stop when others then turn up by blocking the ones whose bus stops are at the kerbside by stopping them from being able to move out;GMPTE should have a list of all the bus companys whose bus depots are either in and around manchester;and start cutting down on the one where theirs more than 6 bus numbers that are all going the same way outwards too wheareas any other town outside mancheter wil be lucky to have just 1 bus only going to its destination 1 way only?another thing Stagecoach are Again putting their twice a year rountine bus fares for all the daily/singles & weekly fares up sgain from this coming sunday;
for instance the weekly megarider goesup 50p and will then be ¿¿9.50p a week yet
stagecoach and all the other bus companys like them must think by keep putting up their bus fares they will get more people using them very muchth other way round even when all the bus drivers earn nearly ¿¿400 a week?& what for
Just for doing a few hours a day "each week" thats far less than what any normal working person who works full time and up to 40 hours a week belicky to get that amount a month? '
mh, fallowfield (13/09/2006 at 15:16)
Alan, Bury (13/09/2006 at 15:29)
Roy Oldham [Ex-Pat], London/Canada (13/09/2006 at 18:36)
Action needed NOW.
needs of the public come first
needs/wants of the bus companies / gmpte and council
come last [if at all].
Make a decision NOW that stops
this stupidity / gets the people moving smoothly and quickly.
If the bus companies are not happy too bad. Days when the municipalities ran the bus services may not always have been great - but this shambles is ridiculous.
There has to be control - if that
means limiting # of buses and or # of companies then do it.
As for fares - flat rates are the norm here in Canada. While a form of this does exist in Manchester it does seem to have variations even on the same route. While competitive fares may seem a good idea from a competition point of view in the case of urban transportation, it really doesn't work in the long run as seen by the current choas.