A FATHERS' rights campaigner who pelted former Education Secretary Ruth Kelly with eggs has said he is not afraid of going to jail.
Michael Downes, 44, of Newall Green, Wythenshawe, pleaded guilty to assault and the case was adjourned for a probation service report.
Downes, who is a member of the campaign group Real Fathers 4 Justice, was bailed until August 15, but Trafford magistrates warned that despite his guilty plea he could still be jailed.
Outside the court he said he had thrown eggs at Ms Kelly to represent: "the two fathers a week who commit suicide because of the actions and inactions of the family court".
"I'm not worried about doing time but I'd like to see my son pass out from Army training so I decided to plead guilty and not to protract things," he said.
"You have to appreciate what this was; it's just an egging - it's been accepted as a form of peaceful protest for years."
Handcuff
The court was told he broke an egg over Ms Kelly's head and threw another one at her when she attended Salford magistrates' court in February.
Ms Kelly, now minister for local government, community and women, had been called to give evidence against another protestor who tried to handcuff her at a pre-election meeting in Bolton.
She escaped the witness box after the man pleaded guilty.
Downes's last-minute guilty plea yesterday again saved the Bolton West MP from giving evidence. Ms Kelly was brought in through the back of the Sale court door amid a heavy police presence. More than 20 officers patrolled the court - and videoed everyone who entered the area.
A handful of Real Fathers 4 Justice supporters turned up for the hearing where Downes's previous convictions were revealed.
In May last year, he received a conditional discharge after throwing an egg at Tony Blair's car in Oldham. The following month he was fined é500 after climbing on top of Manchester Crown Court dressed as Batman.
He received another conditional discharge after he dressed as Santa Claus and climbed a gantry over the M4 near Cardiff, and he was later convicted of a public order offence outside the Big Brother house.
Finally, last month he was convicted of criminal damage after gluing door locks at Trafford Town Hall.
Should Michael Downes be jailed for the attack on Ruth Kelly? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 21 and replies | View All
Colin W, Stockholm (26/07/2006 at 13:14)
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (26/07/2006 at 13:52)
Andrew Steiger, WI, USA (26/07/2006 at 16:35)
Mark Bogan, Yellowknife, NT Canada (26/07/2006 at 17:29)
Jeremy Swanson, Ottawa Canada (26/07/2006 at 18:31)
In another time, in Europe, more men like Michael fighting another bunch of tyrants that once threatened the word might have made all the difference. Instead society turned away and pretended they did not see. In time they became collaborators and part of the tyranny. Their indifference condemned them all. And the world was engulfed.
There is no difference in the level and the intensity of the analogy and the historic parallels. In time people will realize what Michael Downes was fighting for and against. And they will know that he should have been supported rather than condemned.
JS
Steve, Longsight (26/07/2006 at 19:21)
Ruth Kelly is awoman who is incredibly patronising.
d sykes, ontario canada (26/07/2006 at 19:55)
In Canada our system is so rotten that the law is being changed to dismiss criminal offenses made by politicians should the offense be technically illegal but not warrant a conviction. Meanwhile commoners like myself are charged and persecuted to the full extent of the law for damaging our own property.
Feminists have made us this way. God bless men who want to take their testicles back out of some womans purse!
Doug, Canada (26/07/2006 at 20:12)
Don, the 14%er, Sherman, Texas, USA (26/07/2006 at 20:54)
Bob Norton, Milford, Massachusetts USA (26/07/2006 at 21:07)
Fathers For Justice people are heroes and should be treated that way. They are sacrificing themselves for justice and children.
The mdeia should print every one of these stories until family courts are fixed. This is a world wide issue and even against UN rights declarations.
Brian Ersoy, Canada (26/07/2006 at 21:19)
Kevin Thompson, Methuen, Massachusetts, USA (27/07/2006 at 02:46)
dad4justice, New Zealand (27/07/2006 at 08:47)
Dave, Manchester (27/07/2006 at 10:40)
steve moxon, sheffield (27/07/2006 at 10:43)
At some point in the future I will be using the same time-honoured protest method to highlight the appalling civil rights abuses against men in general.
Sam Cino, Hamilton canada (27/07/2006 at 15:34)
If taking children away from innocent fathers not a "Terrorrist act" what is?
democratic nations believe that fathers are not good enough to raise their own children but are good enough to raise some other single mothers children children .GO figure???
family courts are the cancer of society and must be abolished
Sam Cino God bless our children
John T. Smith, CANADA (28/07/2006 at 15:55)
He's quite obviously a hero to those who understand what this fight is about, and one feels certain he has always been one to the children he fought so long and hard for.
But heroes are often lonely men when the cheering dies down and the bands stop playing....
Terry Lear, Toronto, Canada (29/07/2006 at 03:00)
It is common knowledge globally, that countless lawyers and judges encourage, and deliberately orchestrate, vicious acrimony between ex-spouses, year after year, in our very sad World's, rapidly expanding, "Divorce Court Empire".
MPs refuse, again and again, to correct this awful quagmire.... Perhaps many MPs were once lawyers.... Hmmmmmmmm......!
Countless judges and lawyers, without any consciences, only wish to continue feeding, in true "piranha style", their insatiable, and completely disgusting lust for an unlimited financial wealth.
These countless lawyers and judges might change their clearly repugnant and totally unacceptable ways, if any of their Children or Grandchildren were sadly to commit suicide because of a brutal divorce.
Our Children and our Families should not be afraid of Terrorists or known hostile Nations, as their worst enemies are those persons who operate within our Divorce Courts................
Lawyers and judges always "Win". Families always "Lose"....... Devastating and So Very Sad Indeed.....
As for you Ms. Ruth Kelly, I am quite certain that you would not wish to be deprived of spending valuable time with any of your four Children in the event of a divorce. Wake up, and do the right thing by stating the truth publicly:
"ALL CHILDREN must spend EQUAL TIME with BOTH good parents after separation and divorce.... It's simply common sense..."
Terry Lear - Toronto, Canada
Andy, Wythenshawe (29/07/2006 at 19:09)
Clearly they have gathered on this news item to give a false impression that their actions are justified, they are not.
These individuals are too stupid to realise that a non vilolent, non criminal protest is far more successful at getting public backing .
The 2 members at Hoylake showed their mentality, attacking a sporting event that is respected by many, ... they have turned public opinion against them, they are a laughing stock.
AdVader, Utrecht, Netherlands (01/08/2006 at 12:05)
Mick, London (15/08/2006 at 20:04)
People like this should serve prison time for justice to work not some community service.