PLANS to expand the Metrolink tram system across Greater Manchester were finally expected to be given the go-ahead today.
It is believed Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander will give the green light for work on new routes connecting Manchester city centre with Rochdale rail station, Droylsden in Tameside and St Werburgh's Road in south Manchester.
The announcement should allow construction to start by 2008 and be completed by 2010.
SEE our map of the Metrolink extensions.
SEE the timeline of the route to success.
However, the cash the government is expected to promise will not be enough to pay for the original "Big Bang" plan, which was due to take tram services into Rochdale town centre, to Ashton under Lyne in Tameside and through south Manchester, through Wythenshawe and on to Manchester Airport.
'Little Bang'
The scaled-down plan approved today - the "Little Bang" - is estimated to have a price tag of é820m. The shortfall between that figure and the é520m pledged by the government will be met by a loan of about é300m.
Westminster insiders believe the only strings attached to the approval is that costs are kept under control. It is understood that next year, transport bosses in the region will bid for about é400m more from the Transport Innovation Fund to complete the original Big Bang plan - now estimated at a cost of more than é1.2bn.
If they are successful, that money is likely to be linked to conditions - possibly the introduction of road charging in the region.
A decision on this extra cash is not expected until December next year.
Plans on hold
Plans to extend Metrolink were put on hold two years ago when the former Transport Secretary Alistair Darling pulled the plug on a promised é520m for the lines after costs spiralled.
The Manchester Evening News launched the "Get Back On Track" campaign to force the government to rethink the move.
Mr Alexander, who was due to announce the go-ahead in Parliament today before travelling to Manchester, praised the MEN for playing a major part in delivering the extensions to the tram system in Greater Manchester - a contrast to those in Liverpool and Leeds, which were turned down by the government.
"The Manchester Evening News has led a very strong campaign in support of Metrolink and I applaud you for it," said Mr Alexander.
"The Metrolink matters to Manchester. To build on it is something Manchester and the travelling public want and we have been working closely with the Passenger Transport Executive and the local authorities to deliver a tram system that is value for passengers.
"I will be setting out in Parliament later today the latest developments."
Preparation
Today's announcement is thought to be worth about é260m.
This comes on top of more than é200m already given, which has been used to buy land in preparation for the expansion; and a further é60m which has been used to buy a fleet of eight new trams and help fund renewal of rail track between the existing Bury to Altrincham line, some of which is 50 years old.
It all means the track will at last reach the sparkling é36m tram and bus interchange in Newton Heath which is almost complete.Manchester Central MP Tony Lloyd, who has been negotiating with ministers and transport chiefs, welcomed the announcement.
The former Labour minister said: "This is the end of a two-year struggle in which politicians and people in the community - including the MEN - have worked hard together."
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Angry McNasty, City Centre (06/07/2006 at 10:30)
Magic!!!
P.S. Thank you MEN!
Train Driver, Victoria (06/07/2006 at 10:40)
What a disgraceful waste of time and money the conversion of the Oldham Loop is. People commuting from Shaw and Oldham can forget their semi express service in the future, journey times will be extended and fares increased. People at Shaw already pack into the Semi fast train rather than go 'all stops' in comfort. Lets hope the new trams will be a load bigger than the current toy trains that operate on Metrolink. The punters at Oldham can expect to stand on the platform and watch tiny trams with people squashed in like sardines come and go without them getting anywhere near getting on. Progress? I don't think so. The sad thing is that for the price of double track being reinstated between Shaw and Rochdale five or six trains an hour could have run in each direction round 'The Loop' cheaper and quicker.
What a cock up.
Kurt Stephens, Sale, Manchester (06/07/2006 at 10:43)
So long as the 'ends' of the lines are built at some point, as is being suggested, then we are FINALLY moving in the right direction. A great big well done should be given to all those involved from the GMPTE, the MEN and all those involved in getting this back on track.
If on the 20th July 2004 someone would have said that we'd be where we are today no one would have believed you, we need to get those agreed lines built, then crack on and ensure that the remainder of Phase 3 is constructed along with any other options such as the Trafford Centre.
We are finally starting to look like a city with a decent first class public transport system - a great big thanks from me to all who have worked so hard, keep up the good work and ensure that the remainder gets built.
Derek, manchester (06/07/2006 at 10:47)
NO AIRPORT NO HOPSTITAL NO ROUNDTHORN IND EST, NO SHARSTON IN DEST
I THINK THE MONEY
WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER SPENT WITH A DIRECT AIRPORT AND WYTHENSHAWE HOSP
YOU CAN ALWAYS ADD OTHER STOPS LATER ON.
THIS WAY, THE OTHER PROOPSED DESTINATIONS MAY NEVER BE BUILT AT ALL!
Wes, Newton Heath (06/07/2006 at 11:04)
I imagine the fare from Dean Lane to Victoria will at least double with the tram.
All in all though its good news for Manchester.
Dawn, Manchester (06/07/2006 at 11:12)
Train Driver, Victoria (06/07/2006 at 11:25)
A route to Ashton past the stadium? smashing. Relaying tracks through south Manchester through prime commuter land of Chorlton, Withington, Didsbury and East Dids? much needed. Wasting money converting an area already well served by rail with two routes into Manchester providing a worse sevice at a higher price? Scandalous profligacy
Bob Jones, Rochdale (06/07/2006 at 11:35)
Chris, Altrincham (06/07/2006 at 11:39)
andy, prestwich (06/07/2006 at 12:01)
Train Driver, Victoria (06/07/2006 at 12:09)
Caroline, Droylsden (06/07/2006 at 12:10)
I think I'll stick to bus until proven otherwise!
AC, Manchester (06/07/2006 at 12:16)
Joan, Manchester (06/07/2006 at 12:16)
cottonopolis, manchester (06/07/2006 at 12:16)
David, Nth Mcr (06/07/2006 at 12:17)
P. Lowry, Didsbury (06/07/2006 at 12:23)
Graeme, Didsbury (06/07/2006 at 12:42)
Kurt Stephens, Sale, Manchester (06/07/2006 at 13:06)
Given they have got us this far I think we should give them the benifit of the doubt that they'll manage to deliver the rest successfully.
Griff, Woking (06/07/2006 at 13:06)
Buttyboy, Manchester (06/07/2006 at 13:22)
But the bus is far more reliable.
As soon as a tram breaks down, it's chaos.
If a bus were to break down, the next bus could just drive around it.
But when a tram breaks down the whole line is paralysed until it can be moved.
We'd be far better off taking up the tracks, turning them into roads but reserving them for buses.
It'd be more reliable and a lot more reliable.
And middle-class people, who witter on about needing public transport, won't actually give up their cars anyway.
Metrolink is just a waste of taxpayers' money.
chris, stockport (06/07/2006 at 13:52)
Dave C, Didsbury (06/07/2006 at 14:03)
Hull and Proud, East Yorkshire (06/07/2006 at 14:03)
regular train user, rochdale (06/07/2006 at 14:13)
The whole tram money could've gone on something much better for this town.