LOTTERY cash is being used to fund gym membership for lawyers, the M.E.N. can reveal.
A legal firm in Manchester has been awarded a é45,000 grant to send staff to an upmarket city centre health club to help boost their fitness.
Halliwells law firm is one of a number of high-profile businesses in the region to take advantage of lottery-funded handouts aimed at improving the health of office staff.
Another é15,000 has been awarded to ITV Granada to help build a gym which will be free to all staff - including top-earning Coronation Street stars.
And Manchester United, which owns state-of-the-art training facilities for its millionaire players, will be given é30,000 over three years to fund yoga lessons and lunchtime fitness sessions for staff.
The lottery grants were condemned by Withington MP John Leech, who said the cash should go to those who can't afford gym membership.
War veterans who were refused a lottery grant to fund a 2003 memorial journey to Monte Cassino also criticised the way funds were being allocated.
The lottery cash was allocated to the government body Sport England as part of a é1.2m drive to improve the fitness of office staff.
Companies and organisations were invited to submit bids for funding in March last year and Sport England has now revealed which firms has been awarded grants.
Halliwells, which employs 200 legal staff, many earning over é50,000-a-year, was allocated a total of é45,000 to pay staff gym membership fees at L.A. Fitness.
Funds
The firm was given the lottery grant on the condition that it is matched with é45,000 of the company's own funds towards the fitness drive. Ian Austin, senior partner at Halliwells, said: éWe have a range of people working for us for whom gym membership would be beyond their means.é
ITV Granada is putting in é40,000 of its own money into the new fitness facilities, as well as the grant. Spokeswoman Vicki Matthews said: éIf we reduce sick days we will reduce days off, which will be good for the economy.é
United will also be matching their grant in the fitness drive. This is all about getting staff in sedentary jobs active.é
MP Mr Leech said: "This is not a good way to spend lottery money. If there was an all party parliamentary group asking for free gym membership there would be an uproar.é
John Clarke, a war hero from Chorlton whose application for funding to send veterans to Monte Cassino. Ités a very poor example of how to spend peoplesé moneyé
John Hannen, at the Council for Voluntary Service in Manchester said: éWhat these people have is the money to put together a professional-looking application.é
A spokesman for Sport England said: éWe have funded a wide range of organisations and projects, like Primary Care Trusts and other institutions.é
Good use of lottery money? Have your say below.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Barb, Sussex (21/04/2006 at 08:47)
simon, manchester (21/04/2006 at 08:50)
Alex Ramsay, Withington, Manchester (21/04/2006 at 09:04)
'arry, Arbroath (21/04/2006 at 09:04)
Andy, Wythenshawe (21/04/2006 at 09:34)
Time for the MEN to organise a boycott of the lottery till they get their act together.
mandy, stretford (21/04/2006 at 11:17)
Penelope, Withington, Manchester (21/04/2006 at 11:18)
Charles, Alderley Edge (21/04/2006 at 12:32)
Rosaleee's Mum, Cheshire (21/04/2006 at 13:57)
Anne-Marie, Oldham (21/04/2006 at 15:34)
I think there are better causes where these amounts of money would have benefited much more worth while and needy causes of our communities.
I cant afford to visit my local gym.
Disgusted ! and outraged !
Mike, city centre Manchester (21/04/2006 at 16:48)
Presumably they got their jobs on ability not how they looked.
Karlos, Prestwich (21/04/2006 at 17:33)
what NEEDS to happen is the debate about whether to have the lottery at all.
How better/worse off are we really since it started?
Has the lottery achieved the original goals set out at it's inception?
And so on and so forth.
What you are seeing is not the root of the problem but one solitary symptom.
Then look at the culture of gambling and false hope it has promoted - what is the true cost of that (i.e. socially, economically/financially, emotionally)?
Look at how it diverts the responsibility of both local and national government in the (fair) distribution of resources within the nation.
I feel that if these and other relevant issues were addressed then we would see that we are all better off without the lottery as a whole.
Now, where's my scratchcard gone....! :)
Anon, Anon (21/04/2006 at 17:55)
Arthur Hapgood, N.Wales (21/04/2006 at 18:31)
simon, manchester (21/04/2006 at 18:35)
John, Manchester (21/04/2006 at 19:05)
Peter, Stockport (21/04/2006 at 20:22)
Chris, Manchester (21/04/2006 at 20:37)
dave, ashton on mersey (21/04/2006 at 21:59)
Joe Public, Manchester (21/04/2006 at 22:17)
Debbie, Cheshire (21/04/2006 at 22:31)
Patrick Sudlow, Hulme (21/04/2006 at 23:18)
ex mancunian, sydney australia (21/04/2006 at 23:56)
The rich get richer & everyone else gets 'sod all'.
But lawyers, come on be real. What the heck do they contribute to society except double talk often in 'double dutch.
Fran, Mnachester (22/04/2006 at 00:33)
markyboy, manchester (22/04/2006 at 09:46)
those poor little dears at man u & corrie cant afford to go to the gym on thousands a week in wages, my heart bleeds for them.
the sooner camelot gets the boot the better, if my memeory serves me right virgin very nearly got the franchise last time, until branson publicly withdrew his support for phony & co., then the decision changed overnight.
so to the company & sponsors of the new lottery franchise tell phony you will back him come what mat may and you will get the franchise.
cynical ploy it maybe, but look at phony's past record, need i say anymore.