A MOTHER has been jailed for failing to make her daughter go to school.
Linda Smith, 52, admitted she had failed to make her teenage daughter attend Broad Oak High in Bury. It was the third time in two years she had appeared before magistrates for the same offence.
The mother-of-three is one of the first parents to be jailed for the offence in Greater Manchester. An order which would have prevented her identification was lifted after an application to Bury magistrates by the M.E.N and other media.
The court heard that in August 2004 Smith, of Copse Drive, Bury, was fined '200 for not making her daughter go to school between January 5 and May 28.
Failed
She appeared before magistrates again in April last year after the teenager failed to attend between September 2004 and January 28, 2005. Smith was then conditionally discharged for two years and given a parenting order.
Magistrates heard that numerous efforts by education workers to contact her and arrange school meetings had failed.
Smith failed to answer her front door, ignored telephone calls and written letters from education welfare officers, and failed to abide by the terms of the parenting order.
Last month she pleaded guilty to her third offence after magistrates were told her daughter did not attend school once between September 21 and November 4 last year.
Magistrates jailed her for 20 days. They said they had no option because the continued absence was harming the girl's education.
'Wilful disregard'
Chairman of the bench Alan Rogers told Smith: "We are not convinced by your personal determination to send her to school. In fact, we believe you wilfully disregarded your own personal responsibility.
"The offence was committed knowing the likely outcome. The risk of harm is high. We feel no other sentence is appropriate other than an immediate custodial sentence.
"You have failed to comply with court orders and the education welfare officers."
Magistrates were told problems with absenteeism began when the girl was at primary school. They heard there were no issues with bullying, simply that the girl "does not want to go".
Yolanda Addisson, prosecuting, said Smith felt it "wholly unfair" that she was being punished for her daughter's actions.
She said: "It may be that it is already too late to help her, but if she misses any more school then she is not going to get her GCSEs."
Shabir Khattak, defending, said the girl would lock herself in her bedroom and not get out of bed.
Mystery
"To drag her from home through the streets is going to be extremely difficult. It has proved extremely difficult for her.
"It is not a question that Miss Smith does not want her to do well at school or go to school.
"No one knows why she is acting in this fashion. It is a mystery. Nobody can tell her what to do.
"Teachers have indicated she is relatively articulate. She is a bright young girl. Miss Smith feels that it is unfair."
Council education bosses welcomed the jail sentence. Alan Cogswell, social inclusion service manager, said: "Parents should listen to this and take heed. We have a responsibility to safeguard children's interests and needs."
SHOULD parents be jailed for their children's truancy? Have your say.
PLUS: Take part in our Poll of the Day.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Louise, Ashton (02/03/2006 at 09:30)
Andy, Bury (02/03/2006 at 09:34)
blowerjustice, manchester (02/03/2006 at 09:40)
Colin W, Stockholm (02/03/2006 at 09:43)
mufc, london (02/03/2006 at 09:52)
Ace Riley, manchester (02/03/2006 at 10:08)
Katie, Manchester (02/03/2006 at 10:20)
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (02/03/2006 at 10:41)
Jane Davis, Manchester (02/03/2006 at 10:57)
Tamzin, Manchester (02/03/2006 at 11:12)
Anne, Manchester (02/03/2006 at 11:20)
And her mother should stop receiving benifits. That should be a good wake up call to get out and get a job.
Jo, Stockport (02/03/2006 at 11:48)
Although do agree with the comments made - stop mum's benefits, she'll soon shift her backside!
Paul, Bury (02/03/2006 at 12:20)
carol fletcher, essex (02/03/2006 at 12:21)
But there are children who you get to school and then leave soon after the parent has left the grounds.........then who is responsible parent or school?
And who is responsible if the school doesnt chase up like in my sons case i had to fight the school with the help of a councilor.
Nic, Work (02/03/2006 at 12:50)
I got caught wagging it when i was a kid and my mum took a week off work and took me to school every morning, came to see me at break times and took me home at lunch then picked me up again at 3.30. This went on for a week til i convinced her that i wouldnt do it again. The embarrasment was awful. If my mum nipped it in the bud then and my sister has recently done a similar thing with my nephew then why cant she?? I agree stop her benefits. Hit her where it really hurts. Depriving the kid of her parent isnt doing any good.
Sue, Rochdale (02/03/2006 at 12:59)
Maxine, Stockport (02/03/2006 at 13:05)
Another Rude Bus Driver, Bury (02/03/2006 at 13:08)
R J Armstrong, Derby (02/03/2006 at 13:54)
The girl is still not at school,
What has been acheived?
Ms D, Manchester (02/03/2006 at 14:36)
Colin W, Stockholm (02/03/2006 at 15:21)
Fixit, Middleston (02/03/2006 at 16:00)
blue nose, stockport (02/03/2006 at 17:01)
allan, wythenshawe (02/03/2006 at 17:33)
Debbie Moore, Stockport (02/03/2006 at 17:41)
My daughter would not bother if I got sent to jail, she would probably find it funny! But not as funny as I would find it if she were made responsible for her actions!
IE: Boot Camp would be a good starting off point for them. The government has made some stupid rules and I think they now need to rethink what they have wrote, and undo it. The children have got far too many rights and the parents not enough rights, which is why this is going on more and more. It was never heard of when I was at school.
Boot Camp should be the No.1 priority for the older children who constantly truant. I would be the first parent to sign my daughter up for it anyway.