A COUPLE were told they could not play the hit song Angels at their register office wedding - because it was too religious.
The plan was to play the Robbie Williams favourite as bride-to-be Julie Monks, 36, walked down the aisle.
But when bridegroom Howard handed the CD to staff at Dukinfield register office, he was told he couldn't have the ballad because there were religious connotations and references to Heaven that could offend ethnic minorities.
Howard, 47, a printer from Queen Street, Hadfield, said: "It's ridiculous. We'd been planning it for 12 months and no-one had said anything about any rules or regulations on the kind of music you can play. You should be able to play what you want at your own wedding."
Shania
Howard said the best man had to dash to get a new CD with From This Moment by Shania Twain as the replacement.
But Howard, a father of two, said: "The trouble was that song's got a really long intro so Julie was outside the door waiting for ages."
Dukinfield town hall referred inquiries to the Registrar General, where a spokesman said: "The marriage Act says that there should be no religious content in civil marriage ceremonies and the Registrar General offers guidance to register offices.
"As it happens, we quite recently started consultations this year about whether this guidance needs to be changed and these consultations are still underway."
Should the happy couple have been allowed to play Angels? Have your say.

Showing comments 1 to 16 and replies | View All
Kim, Burnage (18/08/2005 at 11:05)
When I got married last year that requirement was made clear in every leaflet, book, magazine I read, in the brochures provided by the register office, in the interview and by every venue manager we met.
I agree its frustrating that you can't have what you want. In undertsand why the rules are there but don't necesarrilly agree with them but I don't understand how this couple couldn't have known before hand?
Dave, Crumpsall (18/08/2005 at 11:09)
alan, rochdale (18/08/2005 at 12:55)
Paul Gregory, Salford (18/08/2005 at 14:46)
As for the references to Heaven - presumably that's the line "I look above and I know I'll always be blessed with love".
I fail to see how this is more religious than the Shania Twain lyric "And you're the answer to my prayers from up above"!!
babs, manchester (18/08/2005 at 15:00)
sward, Halifax, Canada (18/08/2005 at 15:37)
SB, Oldham (18/08/2005 at 16:07)
Rightly said about going back to their country but it is sad that you think of it like this. I hope you saw the recent documentary by the BBC about British expats living/moving into spain. Well the white brits dominate the area, they open up their own bars, chippies, clubs etc and won't mingle or even talk to the local (native spanish people). Maybe white british people should practice what they preach? When in Rome...... We asians get this constantly reminded and drilled into us, but now it seems that it is ok if you are white. Well you can't have your cake and eat it. I am a 2nd generation british asian male, born and bred in Oldham. England, Oldham is my home, my country. I write better English than a 100% white native of England, I can spell properly, the only thing is my skin colour is tan.
My question is where do I go? If people like you banish us asian brits, what's going to happen to us? Our home is England and our forefathers countries will not accept us, as we are foreigners to them.
I don't care if anyone plays the national anthem or any religious music, and I don't think any of the asian/ethnic people are that bothered. Why is the registry office using ethnics as a blame rather than admitting the law is an ass.
Any problems, the ethnics get the blame.
Babs widen your horizon, not all ethnic people are your stereotypical type, as I am sure it is the same of my thoughts about the white majority - not all white people are bad at spelling and writing.
Kim, manchetser (18/08/2005 at 16:07)
Civil ceremonies are not allowed any religious content, no mention of God, lord, soul, no hymns. no readings with any religious words.
Be grateful that if CoE get any choice, other religions have to have the civil ceremony as well as the religious because otherwise its not a legal marriage.
Stop whinging
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (18/08/2005 at 16:09)
Julie Monks, Glossop (18/08/2005 at 16:40)
MelB, New Jersey (18/08/2005 at 18:11)
Peter, Stockport (19/08/2005 at 00:28)
Bessie Beetroot, Birmingham (19/08/2005 at 10:50)
Kim, Manchester (19/08/2005 at 15:26)
The final decision is up to the individual registrar, some will allow the word soul, others won't.
The comment the council made about offending ethnic minorities is incorrect and is leading to misunderstandings in this discussion.
The song wasn't allowed because the words are associated with one or more religious beliefs.
The fact is the laws have not caught up with the relatively modern trend for more ellaborate civil ceremonies.
Kate Miller Ferris, Victoria, BC, Canada (19/08/2005 at 19:14)
Sharon, Cardiff (19/08/2005 at 23:44)