MANCHESTER's Chief Constable Mike Todd put himself in the firing line by allowing himself to be shot by a Taser stun gun - and then called for them to be made more widely available to frontline officers.
But his call comes as Home Office minister and local MP Hazel Blears insists the weapons should not be given to all officers.
Mr Todd volunteered to be shot by a 50,000-volt Taser after praising them in a speech to officers earlier this year.
The weapons, which fire metal barbs into the skin before delivering an incapacitating electrical charge, are used in situations when previously-armed officers could have no option but to shoot a suspect dead. The gun's developers say they are perfectly safe, but Amnesty International claims 74 people have died in the US after being fired on.
Two months after his speech, Mr Todd demonstrated his confidence in Tasers in the car park of the force's firearms unit where he was on the receiving end of an agonising electrical blast from firearms officer Sgt Mike Keyworth.
Standing 10ft away, Sgt Keyworth issued a clear warning before pulling the trigger, just as he would have done on the frontline.
He shouted: "Michael, Michael, I have got a Taser, stand still. Taser, Taser."
As he lay on the ground the tiny wires trailing from his body to the gun continue to release the charge for what seems like an age, but was just five seconds.
Police firearm officers then knelt beside him on the ground, and prevented him from getting up until the barbs were removed from his skin. Within seconds, he had recovered but was still shaken up.
He said: "It was incredibly painful but I feel fine now. I couldn't move, it hurt like hell, I wouldn't want to do that again. I've never experienced anything like it. You just seem to freeze. If I was carrying a weapon and about to attack a member of the public when this happened, I couldn't have done anything at all, which is why it is important that we have them."
Mr Todd said the new weapon, currently only used by authorised firearms officers, could help save the lives of ordinary beat bobbies.
He said: "I would like to see a situation, gradually and after training is given, to make it available to more than just firearms officers. Our men and women out on the streets need it as a more readily available tool they can deploy. It could save the lives of officers and the public and the man himself."
But in an article in the Police Review magazine, Ms Blears called the gun a "dangerous weapon" which was not an "everyday weapon" appropriate for use in "everyday circumstances".She said: "I would not want to see everyone on the streets having that kind of weapon.
"I am concerned that officers sometimes come up against pretty violent individuals and obviously I want to make sure they have sufficient protective equipment to make sure they are not in danger.
"I think we should have the flexibility to use it more widely than we do at the moment.
"But I am not convinced that every police officer on a neighbourhood team should be equipped with a Taser."
Should taser guns be more widely used? Have your say.



Showing comments 1 to 23 and replies | View All
Richard Everard, Hale Barns, Cheshire. (04/07/2005 at 10:51)
Joey, Ashton under Lyne (04/07/2005 at 11:38)
bernie, stretford (04/07/2005 at 11:52)
Ace Riley, manchester (04/07/2005 at 12:01)
joseph bloggs, manchester (04/07/2005 at 12:03)
Paul, Manchester (04/07/2005 at 12:39)
Now the Taser, give it to all officers so that they can protect themselves while they try to protect the public. If some druken scum threatens an officer, use the taser, why should they put themselves in the firing line.
We live in a society where law and order is breaking down. Police should have the right tools for the job.
Rach, Lytham (04/07/2005 at 12:41)
BigK, Stockport (04/07/2005 at 12:58)
M, Wiltshire (04/07/2005 at 13:13)
I have never had to use my CS spray or ASP on anyone, but you need to have them for the situations that can't be resolved by communication and a firm hand.
Ian, Stockport (04/07/2005 at 13:21)
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (04/07/2005 at 13:24)
Sue, Salford (04/07/2005 at 13:50)
If either Ms Blears or any senior member of Amnesty would like to volunteer to take the place of a hostage, or even act as shields for members of the public who are being terrorised by gunmen and knifemen, then be my guest.
I'll put my money on the Taser!
To the whets I'd say, "Grow up and get your priorities right. If you've not done any wrong, then no-one's going to stun you with a Taser, are they?"
M M, Cheshire (04/07/2005 at 16:28)
Why is Britain always last in everything. IE id cards, europe has had them for years. police still with a staff.
Issue all police officers with weapons is a must.
We want to be part of europe then arm your police as europe does.
dave, nmoor (04/07/2005 at 16:45)
Laurence Tureaud, Manchester (04/07/2005 at 19:21)
People do not realise officers can kill a criminal with an iron bar as long as justified but are not able to shock them into submission alot like the less lethal option of CS/Captor.
I hope the blue mat is standard issue for all of those politically correct people out there.
Steve Williams, Stockport (05/07/2005 at 06:50)
Only could the person who authorised the sending out of those letters not have gone in the firing line instead of you - you are alot more of an asset t lose!
mybol zirichey, m/c (05/07/2005 at 08:12)
Dan, city centre (05/07/2005 at 12:06)
God's Cop, Manchester (05/07/2005 at 13:35)
Firstly, in thousands and thousands of activations the Taser has been proved not to cause injury neither minor of serious. It does NOT work by pain compliance but momentarily interupts the central nervous system incapacitating a person. They do not lose conciousness but they are helpless despite their pain threshhold or tolerance towards C.S or pepper spray. And yet they are fully recovered within moments. There is not a person on this planet who will be able to withstand the effects of a Taser. Now compare that with a baton, the police are not trained to hit with differing degrees of force, if it is justified use you will be hit as hard as possible without question more than resulting in serious or even permanant trauma. CS,cannot be used in enclosed spaces many people have tolerance towards it. Baton guns, the effects vary from no effect to death. Taser is by far the most consistant. The reported deaths in America from Taser use have in every case not been directly attributable and have in every case been down to a secondary cause such as drug misuse, or a person coming into contact with another object whilst falling. It does'nt matter how big you are, if you faced with a person with a samurai sword or other such lethal object you have no chance with a baton. The only option is to stop that person with a conventional firearm which will more than likely result in death. If Taser had been present at the time
Stephen Oake would be alive and there would be an officer at work in Rawtenstall and not in Preston hospital today.
Manc Cop, Manchester (17/07/2005 at 10:50)
We are the only European country where the police aren't routinely armed with handguns, but have much the same problems.
This is the only country where criminals are allowed to run riot, and the police are criticised for using reasonable force when trying to stop them!
If you've done nothing wrong, then you've nothing to fear.
Personally, I'd rather be 'tazered' than sprayed with CS or struck with the baton.
Nicholas Jones, Manchester (16/08/2005 at 12:50)
There are to many human rights these days, people here can be to soft. If the people are warned and still acting as a crinimal should be stunned.
So yes we should have tasers to all police like america.
phil murphy, wigan, Gr manchster (31/10/2005 at 20:43)
dan, stockport (11/04/2006 at 23:14)