WARDENS have issued the first '50 fine for dropping chewing gum in Manchester as part of a new Big Brother-style litter clampdown.
A man was caught on surveillance cameras spitting out the gum in Piccadilly Gardens. CCTV camera operators saw the incident and alerted city centre wardens, who were given a description of the offender. They approached the man and issued him with a '50 fixed penalty notice. It is understood he plans to appeal.
Manchester is one of three cities chosen by the government to use on-the-spot fines to tackle the problem of chewing gum stuck to the pavements.
The penalty scheme has been introduced in a 30,000 square metre area of the city centre covering Piccadilly Gardens, where slabs were cleaned of gum a few weeks ago.
A grant of '100,000 has been handed to Manchester city council to cover the costs of the scheme, which is backed by the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
Support has also been given by the Local Government Association, Keep Britain Tidy, the Improvement and Development Agency and chewing gum manufacturer Wrigleys.
Tough
The campaign began with the issuing of 5,000 gum and butt pouches, known as "stubbies", to passers-by and shoppers. The M.E.N. asked city centre shoppers what they thought of the get-tough drive.
Gavin Sykes, a 27-year-old bookmaker from Levenshulme, said: "I think the idea of fining people is spot on. I don't think it's too harsh because asking people not to drop gum in a pleasant way doesn't always work."
Gemma Brooks, 20, a social services worker from Bolton, said: "It's a good idea as long as everyone knows about it. I don't know how I would feel if they introduced it in Bolton though."
Council Director of Operations Pete North told the M.E.N.: "We are absolutely committed to tackling crime and grime in this city. We find that as soon as you tackle one area, like flyposting, people want to know what we are doing about litter and chewing gum.
"We are going to compare the different approaches, fining people, cleaning the streets, and advertising, and see what works best. If fining is the best deterrent, it could be rolled out to different parts of the city."
Are fines the answer? Have your say below.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
des, manchester (07/06/2005 at 09:53)
also arent the companies as much to blame ?
also anyone who comes up with a gum removing machine or some sort of chemical the dissolves the stuff is onto a sure fire winner a multmillion pound company!!!
PW, Manchester (07/06/2005 at 10:37)
Neve, Manchester (07/06/2005 at 11:31)
Rick Dees, London (07/06/2005 at 16:12)
Steve, Edinburgh (07/06/2005 at 16:12)
When lampposts start spitting out tickets because someone swears or criticises our illustrious leader it will be accepted as a minor increment of the freedom we've already lost to safeguard against the evil of gum.
Chris Packer, Michigan, USA (07/06/2005 at 16:23)
This is a slippery slope. I'm very wary of what this ill conceived "social experiment" will lead to.
The chance to stop this is closing fast.
Maddness.
Eric, Reading (07/06/2005 at 16:35)
Josh, London (07/06/2005 at 16:40)
Jim, US (07/06/2005 at 17:00)
Until then, however, they will be used to ticket those who litter, those who loiter, monitor traffic, ticket parking violators, ticket highway toll violators, and they are even equipped with highly sensitive micrphones to spy into our conversations. Could the government be using the cameras to also track behaviors they could later define as illegal?
What about our legal system and prisons? Can they handle the in flux?
I don't feel safer. I feel more watched, more controlled, and more vunerable. Both to terrorists and my own government. But, hey, I'm an American!
Mac, Manchester (07/06/2005 at 17:16)
John, Salford (07/06/2005 at 17:16)
Dean, Manchester (07/06/2005 at 17:39)
JD, Main (07/06/2005 at 18:43)
Joe, manchester (07/06/2005 at 19:16)
Derrick, L.A.,CA US (07/06/2005 at 19:35)
Jonathan Oates, Manchester (07/06/2005 at 20:40)
CARY G DEAN, RYDE, ISLE OF WIGHT (08/06/2005 at 00:01)
2500 pound fine, if you want I can send you an email with a photo.
Dews, Bristol (08/06/2005 at 02:22)
PoliceState, ideal.society@utopia.org (08/06/2005 at 04:00)
Anyone that stares at another person could be pulled aside for visual harrassment.
If an individual is caught with facial features that indicate they may be holding something back could be tracked and questioned to discover what information they may be hiding.
Once the system is in place, more behaviours can be forbidden and the population area can be expanded.
Dwayne Holloway, Albany, New York - U.S.A (08/06/2005 at 05:56)
(ALL WILL LOVE BIG BROTHER)
It's becoming more and more and more clear that these CCTV cameras going up all around in my country and in europe ARE NOT only for just minor infractions or criminal behavior or terrorists activity.
But the powers at be of the global elite (NWO - New World Order) will make all of our lives a living HELL ON EARTH and total enslavement grid of CONTROL over the masses if the people do not take this seriously and demand immediate voice action then a total prison grid is what we all will get in the name of democracy - (SLAVERY)
1984 IS GLOBALLY COMING OF AGE!!!
Fred, Phoenix, Arizona (08/06/2005 at 08:34)
Maybe the next terrorist will remember not to draw attention to himself by chewing gum. I'm sure they appreciate the warning.
Neve, Manchester (08/06/2005 at 09:55)
Paul, Cheshire (08/06/2005 at 10:00)
Steve Hart, Edinburgh (08/06/2005 at 11:27)
Eg.
'It's Ok because there spying on the bad people. I'm good so it doesn't affect me'
Sorry, but to find a 'bad' person they have to watch EVERYONE.
If you get a fly in your mouth you better be prepared to swallow because your masters are watching!
>Karlox<, Spain (08/06/2005 at 12:19)