TWO POYNTON graffiti artists who etched their 'tags' into the windows of trains have been jailed in a landmark case that gives a stark warning to offenders who wantonly damage public property.
Music students Paul Bannatyne of Spinners Lane, and Mark Rickards of Vernon Road, were sentenced to ten months each behind bars ' plus a three year Anti-Social Behaviour Order apiece ' after admitting causing '45,000 worth of damage.
The jailing, thought to be first of its kind in the north of England, has been welcomed by the village's parish council and the British Transport Police alike who see the step as a clear message by courts not to tolerate graffiti ' the scourge of Poynton for many years.
Bannatyne, 20 ' with the tagname 'Omas' ' and Mark Rickards, 19, who used the moniker 'Ink 13' were trapped after a three-year undercover initiative dubbed 'Operation Juggernaut'.
It has witnessed 25 successful prosecutions since 2003 and has virtually wiped out graffiti on the area's railways.
The two former Poynton High schoolboys were jailed at Manchester Crown Court last Thursday by Judge Martin Steiger who told the pair: 'These offences are graphically shown in the photographs, which reveal a depressingly familiar picture.
'Despite the huge efforts made over the last few years to improve the railway system at considerable public expense, you and others have been responsible for causing the squalid damage of railway property which is demoralising to staff and passengers and which has put taxpayers at great expense.'
The boys' families were said to be in shock and refused to comment.
And later Chief Inspector Graham Bamford from British Transport Police confirmed that the jailings had been a surprise to all concerned.
He said: 'I believe there have been other people jailed in London for this type of offence, but the length of this sentence sets new ground and no-one expected that.
'We welcome the sentence very much. As the judge pointed out, it will be a deterrent to other would-be graffiti artists intending on damaging railway infrastructure or the railway stock.'
Bannatyne and Rickards who both attended MANCAT ' Manchester College of Arts and Technology ' had been 'tagging' trains and railway property on the line from Poynton to Manchester, which means they sprayed or painted their own personal 'signature'.
Both men were also given a three year Anti-social Behaviour Order (ASBO), which says they cannot carry paint, marker pens and spray paint in certain circumstances.
Eleven of the 17 trains operated by First North Western on the line had to be refurbished at a cost of over '100,000.
But Miss Alex Simmonds, counsel for the prosecution, said it was clear other graffiti vandals were also involved in causing damage.
Bannatyne admitted causing more than '28,000 worth of damage and Rickards admitted causing more than '17,000 worth of damage.
They were caught on cameras spraying railway walls and scratching their 'tags' on train windows.
Richard Hartley, for Rickards, said his client realised he had been 'stupid' and wanted to apologise for his 'childish behaviour' and had tried to make amends with First North Western by approaching them and offering recompense.
He said his client had started tagging when he was about 13 and did not realise the seriousness of what he was doing or the cost it incurred.
John Potter, defending Bannatyne, said his client also expressed genuine remorse. 'There is no fear of re-offending and this is very much in his past,' he said.
'He is studying music and it is thought he could have an impressive future in the music industry.'
Later Jack Carney, vice principal at MANCAT, said the policy would be to accept their two students had paid their debt to society by going to jail.
'If a student then wanted to resume their studies we would insist on a supervised re-entry programme consisting of the guidance and support necessary to restart their education.'
And PC Stuart Peers from the British Transport Police said: 'Although Operation Juggernaut is now officially at an end and had proved successful we will continue to clamp down on anyone responsible for this type of damage in the future.'
Poynton has been plagued by graffiti for many years and last year a new parish council committee was formed to tackle anti-social behaviour and low-level crime.
Chairman of the Crime, Order and Environment Committee Coun Howard Murray believed the two youngsters deserved the prison sentence they were given.
He said: 'Graffiti destroys the quality of life for hard-working citizens and increases the fear of crime because it creates a visible crime.
'They are damaging people's confidence in an orderly society.
'Anyone who thinks graffiti is art is an idiot. The sentence underlines it is a criminal offence.
'It is not a bit of fun. It is self indulgent criminality.'
Parish chairman Coun Charles Gorst said: 'This prosecution is going to send out the right message to those people who do this kind thing.'
He added, 'Over the past 12 months Poynton's graffiti has also been reduced because the lengthsman has been painting over it.'
The parish council are given paint by NTL, so the parish handyman can paint over graffiti on cable boxes and are also given paint to cover graffiti on phone boxes.
A spokeswoman from Poynton High School said the headteacher was not available to talk.
Should graffiti artists face severe punishment? have your say
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
M0nkey, Central Manchester (14/04/2005 at 00:03)
Sandra, Southend on Sea (14/04/2005 at 11:04)
All credit to the Judge. It is high time that the magistrates and Judges realised the stress that graffiti causes, and should give maximum sentences in all cases. The only way forward is Zero Tolerance.
Mr K, LONDON (16/04/2005 at 06:01)
TURNER, Manchester (18/04/2005 at 11:24)
BUT sentencing this sort of criminal to a custodial sentence just incurs more and more cost...here is a statistic:
In 1998, Group 4 was awarded the contract to run Cookham Wood Secure Training Centre with space for 40 children between the ages of 11 and 18.
Each place costs B#250,000 p.a. or B#4,800 per week and the current rate of recidivism is over 80%.
and
Since 1995, there has been a 50% increase in the prison population rising from 50,000 to 75,000.
Surely crimes of this sort should be punished by the criminal being made responsible for the damage inflicted, having to repair or put the target back to the original state. Curfews, ASBOs and other such punishments should be used effectively to let these criminals understand that they are being monitored and that there are no second chances. I agree that if this illicits no positive response from the criminal then incarceration and exclusion from society is the sad but final option.
Refering to this case specifically, I do not think that these two peple should have been sentenced to a custodial sentence. There must have been a more constructive way to punish the offenders
Dave L, Manchester (18/04/2005 at 14:53)
Hoods, Manchester (18/04/2005 at 18:30)
D Bradley, N Manchester (19/04/2005 at 20:50)
Rush, Uk (24/04/2005 at 09:38)
J, Manchester (25/04/2005 at 18:44)
The BTP officers who ran this operation are clueless and middle aged so in a few decades they will be dead, I and my peers however will still be painting jail or no jail. Even if we stop there are others that would carry on-question the funding being given to the BTP for fighting a war they can't win. Try and grow back some of the common sense that television and shopping has robbed you of and get on with your life and we'l do the same.
RE.T>Ro, Manchester (27/06/2005 at 13:53)
ink 13, the planet (11/08/2005 at 15:17)
JAIL DOESNT TEACH YOU A THING, AND THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF KIDS OUT THERE WHO ARE WILLING TO RISK A COUPLE OF MONTHS IN PRISON FOR A LOT OF FUN.
Nice one for the support from everyone especially j from manchester Infinate wisdom in that message. p.s i love the evening news. its GREAT
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (12/08/2005 at 11:27)
PW, Manchester (12/08/2005 at 11:44)
inky, still the planet (12/08/2005 at 12:40)
Andy, Wythenshawe (12/08/2005 at 14:22)
Monetary cost in the fight for justice is irrelavant.
PW, Manchester (12/08/2005 at 14:42)
s, withington (12/08/2005 at 15:31)
And if you do think that graffiti is a real threat Isuggest that you take a long look at what really affects peoples quality of life.
Andy, Wythenshawe (12/08/2005 at 19:20)
Garbage, a democratic society is right, and those trying to defend breaking the law are wrong.
" It has been proven that prison does not work "
No it hasn't, it works in many ways , it deters the majority of society from breaking the law, and it takes persistant offenders off the street.
"take a long look at what really affects peoples quality of life "
Graffiti HAS been proven to destroy communities and lower respect for property propagating more vandalism and crime.
S from Withington you need to do your homework before spouting complete garbage.
OMAS, MCR (10/09/2005 at 21:41)
Adam, Hazel Grove (14/09/2005 at 01:59)
colin, manchester (14/11/2005 at 13:58)
OMAS, MCR (07/12/2005 at 20:48)
luke, london (21/02/2006 at 17:02)
it's also moronic to be a graf artist and get caught.
However, the people who put these kids in prison should have known better. It was the least effective thing they could have possibly done. It will just aggitate other artists and create martyrs, not to mention the cost in incurrs. Graffiti is not such a big deal, anyway. Some paint will not get you mugged, it will not steal your car, it won't harrass you or cold-call your house.
You don't have to embrace some of the creative work people are making on our streets, but you can at least tolerate it as much as you tolerate mcdonalds posting giant billboards on the sides of your houses.
You seem to all think raf artists are all loser students. you're wrong. your upper middle class kids are probably scratching pictures into doors right now. Quick, it will lead to heroin. go stop them.
PW, Manchester (22/02/2006 at 18:48)
Jonas, York (27/10/2006 at 01:08)
We should be encouraging graffiti artists to help our society, not criminalising them.