PLANS for Las Vegas-style casinos and fruit machines with '1m jackpots were approved in the Commons, despite a revolt against the government scheme by Labour MPs.
But Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell is under pressure to make more concessions because Tony Blair's 159 majority was halved after a six-and-a-half hour debate on the Gambling Bill.
Dozens of Labour MPs stayed away and 29 voted against the Bill's second reading, including David Chaytor (Bury North) and Terry Lewis (Worsley).
But the Bill went through, with a majority of 74, despite criticisms and after a pledge by Ms Jowell to prevent casinos getting planning permission "by the back door".
Changes
The Labour MP for Blackpool, Joan Humble, said that people in the resort were in favour of allowing big new casinos as long as they went hand-in-hand with regeneration of the area.
But even she said that there should be changes as the Bill goes through parliament.
Ms Jowell assured MPs that there would be no new casinos if residents did not want them. She has predicted there would be no more than 40 of the super casinos but some Labour MPs believe that even this is too many and that a handful should be tested first in resorts, such as Blackpool. Among the critics of the Bill were Donald Anderson, Labour chairman of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, who said there was a world of difference between ordinary people who visited bingo halls and those who went to mega casinos.
"Why can't you have pilot schemes to see what would happen in the real world?" he asked.
Former Labour Health Secretary Frank Dobson said the reforms were "wrong and unpopular", Tory John Whittingdale said the Bill was "fatally flawed" and would increase gambling addiction, and Liberal Democrat spokesman Don Foster said that people did not want to see their areas given a facelift if it brought significant misery for people lured into casinos.
Teenage gamblers suffer from higher-than-average levels of substance abuse and psychiatric problems, scientists said today.
US researchers found 16 and 17-year-olds who gambled were more likely to be depressed and addicted to drink and drugs than non-gamblers.
A similar trend was seen among young adults aged 18 to 29 who had been gambling since their early teens.
Tweet
MPs deal a blow to super-casinos
November 02, 2004
Tessa Jowell

Showing comments 1 to 3 and replies | View All
Paul, Middleton (02/11/2004 at 21:14)
Karl Gardiner, Warrington, Cheshire (02/11/2004 at 22:07)
One only had to scan the (admittedly usually sensationalist) Daily Mail article at the weekend to witness the horrific level of violence gambling addicts are willing to inflict on innocent bystanders in order to fund their needs. Now this violent behaviour can of course be accredited to any form of addiction, yet should not be condoned or encouraged in the way it seemingly has been by the irresponsible politicians who permitted passage of this bill.
Yes, it is a relief that some common sense prevails in the voice of the dissenters - Frank Dobson et al - yet I find it unbelievably appalling that in a reading of a Bill whose content has such far-reaching future implications, that (to quote) "dozens of Labour MPs stayed away". These are ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES - one has to wonder just whose interests are supposed to be being best represented with this attitude towards attendance.
How laughable is Ms Jowell's "pledge to prevent casinos getting planning permission by the back door". We have all seen how successfully adhered to that rule is, if judging by the "back door" meetings and doubtless administrative incentives from US casino management so far is anything to go by. Working to current modus operandi then, we should all have nice friendly neighbouring mafia-run establishments within the foreseeable future.
As is becoming increasingly evident and disturbingly obvious with our current government, the thoughts, concerns and wishes of the voting public are irrelevant and viewed with disdain within the corridors of power.
I guess we shouldn't hold our breath for Tony to announce a referendum regarding Europe, just let him enjoy the daytrip ticket to another multi-million-dollar junket, and sign whatever paperwork he can get his unctuous hands on.
Meanwhile, perhaps he would prefer it if his voting public just go back to their spoonfed diet of reality TV and not let the greased wheels of political reality seize up while he can still enjoy the ride?
Peter, Stockport (04/11/2004 at 00:40)