TONY BLAIR today defended the government's decision to scrap the "Big Bang" expansion of the Metrolink tram service in Manchester because of its escalating cost.
In an exclusive interview with the Manchester Evening News shortly after Transport Secretary Alistair Darling told MPs the cherished scheme was too expensive, the Prime Minister said the government had to "cut the cloth according to our needs".
He said: "The problem has been that there has been a very sharp escalation of cost that we need to find a way of dealing with," said Mr Blair, speaking in the Cabinet room at 10 Downing Street.
"So what Alistair is saying is that the original sum of money we said we'd spend on this we're prepared to commit, but what we cannot do is commit without finding out how we'll finance additional sums of money.
Discussions
"I'm well aware of the importance of Metrolink in Manchester, but there has got to be a method of financing it - and for London that's true of the Crossrail plan as well."
The Prime Minister added: "My understanding when I was looking at this is that the cost is the issue.
"What we can't do is extend the overall budget of the Department of Transport, but what we can do is continue discussions with local civic leaders and business people and others to find out how we can make sure what the people of Manchester want happens without us going over the limits we have already set ourselves.
"Light rail has been a success, but in the end we've got to cut the cloth according to our needs.
"We set aside a significant sum of money for this but we have got to make sure it's going to be done in a way we can afford."
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 10 and replies | View All
Dean Martin, Manchester (21/07/2004 at 12:03)
Doug, Manchester (21/07/2004 at 13:43)
Mike O'Sullivan, Chorlton,Manchester (21/07/2004 at 16:33)
I would suggest the very fact that B#200m of public money has been wasted on preparatory work for the scheme, which has now been scrapped is, in itself, justification for Darling's resignation.
Once this has been achieved, the focus could then change to opening further discussion with a newly appointed Transport Minister.
M.Mitchell, Warrington (21/07/2004 at 19:47)
Chris, Stockport (21/07/2004 at 21:01)
Jim Ogden, Droylsden, Manchester (22/07/2004 at 16:07)
Or use the web try
www.faxyourmp.com to get this decision reversed.
50 derelict houses in Droylsden getting slowly wrecked by vandals, no thanks....
Bill Monks, Bury (22/07/2004 at 21:15)
Zaida, Ashton U/L, Manchester (23/07/2004 at 19:50)
What about the impact on pollution that using cars create? Logically public transport is better for the environment.
I'm not suggesting usin tax money. But what about creating partnerships with private investors? ?
The cost of your decision will be nothing in comparison of how much it will cost you at election.
What about the creation of jobs, private investment and new opportunities for the area?
There was money to fight a war. Certainly you didn't ask people if they minded the amount of tax payers money on this occassion. You certainly didn't follow your best judgement on this ocassion. You didn't just lost money, but many lives will be in your concience for ever.
Remember Mr. Blair you will pay a higher price than this. It will cost you your job.
People in the North West had had enough.
Remember Aznar?
Fed up up North
Morse, Manchester (26/07/2004 at 21:01)
David, Birmingham (Manchester at weekends) (07/10/2004 at 14:22)