I DARESAY it is not necessary to remind the devout that May 6, the date chosen for the general election, coincides with the Feast of St Prudence. She, so profitable to the altar candle trade, was a 15th century abbess of Milan who in a high wind, could persuade the sheep to dance for her.
What good this did the sheep is historically unclear, but it is certain that Prudence’s most obvious acolyte, Gordon Brown, will be hoping to choreograph a similar response from electoral flocks up and down the land over the next five weeks.
Personally, I feel far more inclined to cry ‘bah’ than ‘baa’. The toe-cap of my stoutest right boot is poised to kick the shambling Scotttish pastor’s backside, fearing that to jig supinely behind it it might lead me into a bloody abattoir.
But wait, oh wait. Why am I still hopping undecidedly about like the proverbial one-legged contender in a backside kicking contest? It is because I have just watched the prime minister’s only possible supplanter, Duke Dave Cameron, tearing around Westminster on a traffic-blocking bicycle.
What I so suddenly see in him is a pink, fleshy, self-preening Tory boyo, full of false smiles that never quite reach two duck-egg blue popping eyes, and a giddying propensity to move in zig-zags. God knows where he, or the teams of chums, ancient and modern, trotting in wheezing spasms behind him, think they are going. All I know, instinctively, that it is not in my direction.
My dilemma is wearying. I can think of at least a score of reasons for throwing Labour out of office. The first, and by no means the least important of these, is that I am dead against uninterruptible one party rule. The lot seeking yet another five years’ contract have been in for nearly 13 years—a transit of life so long that I have gone grey in it, seen kiddywinks reach their chavtime twenties in it, lost most of my dander for cigarettes and wild women in it. The bright babes Blair ushered in for decoration have turned to thin-lipped, finger-wagging crones.
Time for a change? Yep, it ought to be, even if on the day, it ain’t. Longevity apart, this marathon Labour administration has got many things so disastrously wrong. Education? What education? At least a third of the kids leaving primary school are unable to read and write, and the universities are filling up with adolescents who require remedial classes before studying for Mickey Mouse degrees.
One correspondent of mine chides me, without irony, for refusing to accommodate a presumed readership many of whom being from foreign parts, still can’t recognise an English Taxi sign and the rest, though born and bred here, only words addressed to a reading age of nine. The urge to assume a universal and unalterable cretinism has become proscriptive.
And then there is the bullying. Unceasingly, throughout each of its three terms, the party of the people has found one damnable way after another to boss the people about. No singing in the rain, no dancing in the square, no frolicking in the grass. Well, no: I’m exaggerating a bit about those, except, maybe, the grass.
The others are atrocities yet to come. But young women have gone to jail for not leaving their dustbins out at the right hour. Pensioners have been lifted for inadvertently dropping a piece of orange peel. Pubs have been raided for letting their regulars smoke. The anti-smoking ban has altered the nation’s social landscape more than any edict since Cromwell’s. It has led to war veterans standing in the pouring rain outside their British Legion Clubs, puffing on the comforting stuff that kept them going when the stormed Normandy. Many of these clubs have closed down—along with many a Connie, and yes, as many a Labour club.
The zest to impose laws against simple pleasures has not been accompanied by an equal eagerness to combat serious crime. Murders and armed robbers are let out of jail many months, and sometimes years, before their sentences have expired. Justice Minister Jack Straw, once so stern a law’n’order man, says they must be, partly because the jails are overflowing, partly because the government submits to eccentric European ideas on the human rights of malefactors.
At weekends, the streets of our town centres are surrendered to roving gangs of hooligans. There are council inspectors, comically known as “education enforcers, “ patrolling the streets in search of accidental and preferably elderly litter louts. They have no mandate to enforce punitive education on the rampage.
Against this government, I draw a withering charge-sheet. It should settle the matter. But it doesn’t. I have a long memory, and when I look at Duke Dave I cannot help thinking, ‘Could that be another Ted Heath? Or worse, a Thatcher?” And with the Tories it could be, as it was last time they were in, not 13 years hard but 18.
Sorry folks: it’s boring. But for the first time I am politically a baffled member of the vast multitude that can’t make up its mind.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 7 and replies | View All
ergo (09/04/2010 at 10:40)
The best health and welfare run mainly by voluntary organisations.The working class looked after itself,and its children.The upper class kept quiet about its decadence.
We had the finest most skilled workforce,who were fit and healthy enough to deal with many setbacks, alone intially to play a major part in defeating tyranny in many parts of the world in an horrendous world war.
Then we elected a labour government determined to ignore all the problems this had left in favour of forcing through its own wild untested hypothesis.Shouting down everyone who disagreed. As a result we now have an unfit unhealthy lumpen incapable of understanding even the simplest things.
If I was seeking power I would first test any theory I had on a small scale, and discuss it thoroughly.
Fat chance of that when the world is run by sound bites and headlines,and money.Money.Money.
Where did all this money come from? we were bankrupt in 1945,bankrupt in 1974, and we are sure as hell bankrupt now.
Black Flag (09/04/2010 at 11:01)
I've steadily come to the conclusion that that is effectively what we've got and will probably continue to have, irrespective of who ends up as Prime Minister. The whole Labour v Tory charade is looking about as convincing as a typical good cop / bad cop routine. They all want power in perpetuity, but knowing that won't happen, they'll happily allow power to pass back and forth between them, knowing that it'll keep people playing the game.
I really hope we get a hung parliament, because it's the only way I can see any hope of meaningful change.
Acid, Chadderton (09/04/2010 at 11:08)
9/04/2010 at 10:40
Of course, none of it has anything to do with the fat-cat bosses skimming all they could off the top and investing nothing into the future of their relative industries and thus allowing the Asian manufacturers to get a foothold in our own markets. Having seen this, the fat-cats then took their manufacturing bases abroad and utilised that same virtual slave labour to increase the unemployment in their own country just to squeeze those extra few pounds into their already bloated fortunes. They've been screwing this country since long before 1945!!
David Cameron's Lucky Pants, on the steps of No 10! (09/04/2010 at 12:44)
acid: I think you'll find our main problem these days is the so called working class screwing us for benefits.
citycentre, manchester (09/04/2010 at 13:32)
"In 1938 Britain was the best country in the world" and "we elected a labour government determined to ignore all the problems "
Except Ramsey McDonald was PM from 1929 to 1935.
"who were fit and healthy enough to deal with many setbacks"
Really? A white male born in the 1930's could expect to live until 60, now its about 75.
"A beacon of light to the empire and much of the world"
India was well on the way to independance and had already secured the Government of India act 1935. Ireland had already left the Empire, though bombings continued in the UK through the 1930's.
Oh and unemployment rates through the 1930's reached 20% of the workforce
Nostalgia and rose tints do not make up for a lack of knowledge.
ChrisG (09/04/2010 at 14:52)
I am clear that many hard-working people in Britain have contributed significantly to the growth of the economy in the boom years. I am clear that much taxpayers' money has been pumped into public sector bureaucracy, state-sponsored meddling and a welfare state that promotes idleness as a lifestyle choice. I am clear that the bust years will require an unshakeable strength and determination to reduce public spending.
Any party which comes to power will need to fix the economy. It doesn't much matter which one you pick. But which party is going to fix the problems in society so ably highlighted by Mr Grimes? Of this, I am also very clear - none of the above.
Acid, Chadderton (09/04/2010 at 20:14)
9/04/2010 at 12:44
You've been reading the Daily Mail comic again haven't you?