The English Defence League rally in Bolton will go ahead on Saturday after the Home Secretary said he had no power to ban it.
The council was hoping that Alan Johnson would outlaw the demonstration on safety grounds, fearing violence could erupt in the town centre.
A delegation of council chiefs and faith representatives including the Bishop of Bolton travelled to London to meet Alan Campbell, a parliamentary under-secretary of state responsible for crime reduction.
Hopes of a ban however have been dashed after Mr Johnson responded in a letter to say he was powerless to intervene.
The Home Secretary said he had examined all relevant law but the government had no power to prevent an assembly. Laws to ban marches do exist but the demonstration is expected to be static and confined to Victoria Square near Bolton Town Hall off Le Mans Crescent.
The leader of Bolton council said he was 'disappointed' at the news but said the Home Secretary had only 'limited powers'. Coun Cliff Morris said: “We and the faith and community leaders have done everything within our power to prevent this demonstration due to the risk of violence.
“We are disappointed that the Home Secretary has been unable to ban this demonstration, however we understand that under current law his powers are extremely limited. In the anticipation that a ban was unlikely, we have been working for some time with the police and local communities.
“We are confident that our excellent community relationships will not be harmed by this proposed demonstration and we urge local people not to be provoked into taking part in any counter-demonstration.”
Log on Saturday for live up to minute coverage of the EDl demo, including video and photographs.
The government only has the power to ban a static assembly if it is on private property.
In the letter the Home Secretary said that the government supported the right of people to peacefully express their views in public under the principles of free speech.
He adds however that it must be balanced against the rights of local communities to go about their daily business without fear of intimidation.
The controversial far-right group describes itself as a peaceful, non-political group campaigning against 'militant Islam'.
Ugly scenes marked an EDL protest in Manchester last year, with 44 arrests and 10 injuries.
Further details about the specific policing operation were expected to be released Thursday.
Log on Saturday for live up to minute coverage of the EDl demo, including video and photographs.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Stickman, Bury (17/03/2010 at 20:12)
Emjay See supporting City is not being able to wake from a dream that keeps getting better and bette (17/03/2010 at 20:16)
When in Rome (17/03/2010 at 20:35)
Hamish Macbeth, Whitefield (17/03/2010 at 21:00)
With no "opposition" the EDL march would pass off as a damp squib - and there would be a lot less violence.
I am no fan of the EDL - but the opposition are not much better either.
Have neither anything better to do on a Saturday afternoon.
Breezeblock, Manchester (17/03/2010 at 21:45)
thoughtful, East of Manchester (17/03/2010 at 21:53)
Why is it that the extreme left is so wedded to violence? nearly every time there's a problem at a demo you'll find the extreme left, I'm sure that this weekend will be no different.
With a group like the EDF it would be reasonable to assume that Moslems would take offence and make a counter protest, but they've got more sense and are not up for a fight like the other two obviously are.
citypedro, manchester (17/03/2010 at 22:30)
It may be 34/35 yrs but it will never be 37yrs., Mossley (17/03/2010 at 23:57)
The EDL & the BNP are doing what a majority of English people are thinking you read it everyday in the nationals how the human rights is being used against the English by foreigners and what about the the firm that will only employ Polish workers, someone has to have their say for the English.
A Saracen (18/03/2010 at 08:24)
Black Flag (18/03/2010 at 09:41)
Well, if you oppose the concept of human rights, surely you should be backing the council in their move to ban the protest, rather than allowing the EDL to claim that they have a human right to protest. Or are you just parroting the usual tired inaccurate nonsense churned out by some of the nationals?
"someone has to have their say for the English."
I'm perfectly capable of speaking for myself. I don't need a bunch of knuckle-draggers to do it on my behalf.
Rujibabes, Rochdale (18/03/2010 at 10:09)
Theowolfe (18/03/2010 at 10:36)
citypedro,
Well not really, the police have too much power and are out of control. It is becoming a less free "civilised democracy" by the day.
TREVOR THOMAS (18/03/2010 at 11:04)
Esso Blue. Apple Blossom time, Manchester (18/03/2010 at 11:13)
m69 alty (18/03/2010 at 11:22)
"Ugly scenes marked an EDL protest in Manchester last year, with 44 arrests and 10 injuries" - yes its a shame the UAF turned up, always seems to get violent when the lovely socialists and unwashed appear, but I'm sure the MEN meant to include that some of the arrests and scuffles with police were UAF.
"The controversial far-right group describes itself as a peaceful, non-political group campaigning against 'militant Islam'." - lets hope the 'impartial' Manchester evening news report this in a 'fair' and 'balanced' way.
Dan North (18/03/2010 at 12:05)
Extremists of any kind offer nothing good whatsoever, and the EDL are firmly within this bracket despite their slick PR claims.
No doubt after another trouble filled protest, the message boards will fill up with EDL supporters applying the same old ‘honest, it wasn’t us, guv’ line. Sorry, not fooled anymore.
arachne, The Web (18/03/2010 at 12:06)
Anne Coates, Jersey Street (18/03/2010 at 12:09)
My self and Mr Coates have just arrived back from a few days on the continent - Spain to be precise. I am amazed how Spanish it all still feels. We've also been to Italy, Greece, France, Eire etc etc and they all feel as if they have an identity. England, on the other hand, appears to have no single identity these days. On the one hand you have the skin-headed, tattooed morons, on the other the hijab-wearing, urdu-speaking asians. And in the middle me and millions like me who aren't allowed to have a view for fear of being accused of being one or the other.
I wish I'd have left years ago.
CorneredAllTheLuck, Tameside (18/03/2010 at 13:11)
Esso Blue. Apple Blossom time, Manchester (18/03/2010 at 14:09)
Is It Me? (18/03/2010 at 14:24)
davefb, bolton (18/03/2010 at 14:25)
Black Flag (18/03/2010 at 14:46)
I find that a very worrying approach. It risks allowing the government of the day to silence dissent by labelling any opinion which diverges significantly from its own as extremist and therefore inherently wrong, irrespective of what that opinion is. Don't forget, at one time, being a democrat would have had you labelled as an extremist.
It reminds me of the Barry Goldwater quote: "I would remind you that extremism in the defence of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
Andy., Bury (18/03/2010 at 15:26)
Anne Coates, Jersey Street (18/03/2010 at 15:42)
If you are happy to ignore the marxist extremists (UAF by any other name) whilst vilifying the extreme right, you are idiotic and should spend some time reading up what lovely Stalin did rather than nasty Hitler.
Most anti-EDL posts read like politically naive pap.