Historic plans for Greater Manchester's 10 councils to share their powers could be on the brink of collapse.
The proposals – which would see unified policies on skills, economic development and transport – have taken years to prepare and have been hailed by ministers as an example to the rest of the country.
They were due to be agreed by the leaders of the councils at a meeting on Friday.
Now the M.E.N has learned at least two councils – Liberal Democrat-run Stockport and Conservative-led Trafford – are set to vote 'no'.
Both have concerns about the fact that once they have signed up to the deal, they will not be able to walk away without the government's permission.
They are also unhappy that decisions will be made an a strict majority basis – meaning a six-four vote will force them to follow the other councils' lead.
Congestion charge
Senior sources at both councils point out that those arrangements would have seen Greater Manchester introduce a congestion charge in return for billions of pounds to spend on public transport. In the event, the issue was put to a referendum – and roundly rejected in all 10 council areas.
Frantic negotiations have been going on for the past few days as senior local government officials try to salvage a deal.
Any collapse - coming on the back of the abortive congestion-charge bid - would be a major embarrassment for council leaders who have thrown their weight behind the plans.
Supporters of the deal remain confident a compromise will be found before the Friday deadline.
If Stockport and Trafford do pull out, the remaining councils could still choose go ahead - raising the prospect of a 'Greater Manchester' without Trafford Park and Old Trafford cricket and football grounds.
The proposal is for AGMA - the current, purely voluntary coalition of 10 council leaders - to be beefed up into a 'combined authority'. This body would have binding powers over its members.
The 10 leaders will meet on Friday. They were expected to agree to recommend the move, which must then be voted through by all individual councils before being rubber-stamped by the secretary of state.
The plans have been given extra urgency by the prospect of a general election, with the Conservative opposition yet to throw their backing behind such 'city-regional' arrangements.
Greater Manchester's five Labour-run councils - Manchester, Salford, Wigan, Tameside and Bolton - are believed to be in favour of the deal. Liberal Democrat-run Rochdale and Oldham, and Bury - which is Conservative controlled - are yet to show their hands.
Friday's meeting could now become the equivalent of a high-stakes poker game. If Trafford can be brought back into the fold - possibly by making it easier to leave the new group - Stockport could be left isolated. That would give them a major headache in trying to plan issues like local transport, which naturally crosses council boundaries.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 8 and replies | View All
markyboy, manchester (24/02/2010 at 08:45)
one thing bothers me, why are we the electorate being ignored, we should have a say on m\atters that concern US.
i do notice that its all the labour run councils that are in favour, is it cos they cant abide losing power to anyone??
well done trafford & stockport for backing out
Deejay, Bury (24/02/2010 at 12:39)
Albert Bino (24/02/2010 at 12:49)
Black Flag (24/02/2010 at 12:55)
Either council boundaries would have to be periodically readjusted to keep them roughly the same size, or we'd be permanently stuck with rotten boroughs. Neither sounds a great prospect.
Athertonian (24/02/2010 at 15:30)
If it's such a good idea, why not ask us all? Come on AGMA - remember the Congestion Charge? Or don't you trust the electorate to come up with the "right" answer? What a disgraceful shower.
The Golden Gusset, Urmston (24/02/2010 at 16:57)
gladys rowbotham, Manchester (24/02/2010 at 17:58)
Such a huge transfer of power from the local authorities to an unelected quango with absolutely no mandate from the electorate! Getting closer to the communities? Let's all laugh together!
Who's running this show anyway? Thank you, Stockport and Trafford for not being railroaded by local government bureaucrats and Council politicos!!!
Rammylad (24/02/2010 at 18:27)
Well here it is.
Well done to the two councils with a pair of balls each. Shame on Bury.
What next though, once we have GtrM then Gtr Liverpool, then Gtr Leeds, why not merge them in Gtr North Middley. Then merge that with Gtr Middly Middly and Gtr Bottom of the Country and Gtr Top 'o' Country. Then ..... Oh hang on a minute nothing would ever happen locally.
If they came out and said we will merge all 10 councils and dispose of 90% of the staff, then yes i am all for it. The lunacy of this idea is they will no doubt need to employ extra people to manage it. More Poll Tax hikes and lavish pensions for incompetent councillors.