More than 1,000 Manchester airport workers have voluntarily signed up for ID cards.
All staff who work 'airside' – beyond airport security - are eligible to get a free card as part of the regional roll-out of the ID cards scheme.
So far more than 1,000 airport workers have been issued with cards since they were launched in November, and bosses say they are pleased with the response.
Normally a card would cost £30 but the fee is being waived for staff during an 18-month evaluation period, which is also taking place at London City airport.
Staff who work airside already have to undergo tough checks before being given security passes but Home Office bosses say the new cards – which use biometric data – improve safety even further and workers are being urged to sign up.
A new report published by the Home Office explains how the success of the 18-month review period will be measured.
It will aim to assess if ID cards streamline the airside pass regime and speed up the reference checking process for staff and employees.
The government intends to roll out the scheme to all airports by the end of 2012 but wants to examine the costs to avoid placing an extra 'burden' on the aviation industry.
The report reads: “By fixing a person’s biometric identity when they hold a voluntary identity card, the checking process is less vulnerable to identity fraud which, in turn, increases confidence in the individual’s trustworthiness.
A spokesman for the Home Office added: “The first 18 months of the scheme will be an evaluation period and during this period, the government and industry in partnership will assess the benefits and achievements of the service and consider how the process can be further developed for future phases.”
Anyone living in Greater Manchester can apply for a identity card, with the government intending to introduce the voluntary scheme nationally by the end of 2012.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 13 and replies | View All
David Moss (19/02/2010 at 09:35)
Strange.
After all, in the whole of the northwest, only about 2,700 people signed up for ID cards, during the Identity & Passport Service's December 2009 marketing campaing.
Why this disproportionate interest in ID cards among airside workers? It's a mystery.
Or is it? Look at the Financial Times, 4 November 2008*:
"Manchester and London City airports have signed up in principle to the scheme after the government agreed to fund the trial, introducing the first wave of ID cards free of charge to the users and providing a further £500,000 ($790,315) towards improvements in pre-employment checks at the two airports."
These airside worker registrations weren't voluntary. They were bought.
----------
* http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9cbc479c-aa98-11dd-897c-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
David Moss (19/02/2010 at 09:43)
They would say that, wouldn't they?
Have you ever seen any evidence to suggest that the biometrics being used by the Home Office are reliable enough to improve security? No*.
Are the present non-biometric security arrangements deficient? If so, how come the airport still has a licence to operate? Remember the fury of airline bosses and unions back in July 2008**:
"In a strongly worded letter to Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, airline bosses said that forcing airport workers to have an ID card from November next year was "unnecessary" and "unjustified"."
If the industry thought that today's flaky biometric technology would improve security, they would have introduced it themselves. They didn't. The Home office's claim that their biometric ID cards will improve security cannot be supported. It is a false claim.
----------
* http://dematerialisedid.com/Register/regBiometrics.pdf
** http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/2236720/Airlines-anger-over-ID-cards.html
HC John, Stockport (19/02/2010 at 10:24)
I quote from the IPS website: "Please note that you are required by law to keep IPS informed of any changes to your personal information. The guidance notes which accompany the form explain how to do this. If you deliberately choose not to let IPS know that your details have changed, you may have to pay a civil penalty of up to £1,000."
David Moss (19/02/2010 at 10:39)
“By fixing a person’s biometric identity when they hold a VOLUNTARY identity card ..."
"Anyone living in Greater Manchester can apply for a identity card, with the government intending to introduce the VOLUNTARY scheme nationally by the end of 2012."
Voluntary. That's the name of the game. Voluntary.
According to the Independent newspaper, 30 June 2009*:
"British citizens will never be forced to carry ID cards, Home Secretary Alan Johnson said today ... "Accordingly I want the introduction of identity cards for all British citizens to be VOLUNTARY" ..."
But what does Mr Johnson, whose picture adorns this article, mean by "voluntary".
In the same month, June 2009, Mr Johnson wrote in the foreword to a Home office strategy paper on ID cards**:
"I fully endorse the actions set out in this strategy and look forward to supporting their delivery."
And what is the Home office strategy on the National Identity Service (NIS)? Paragraph 3.30 says:
"The vision for the NIS is that it will become an essential part of everyday life, underpinning interactions and transactions between individuals, public services and businesses and supporting people to protect their identity."
The Home Office want ID cards to "become an essential part of everyday life". If they have their way, in other words, it will be impossible to live without them. That is what they mean by "voluntary".
----------
* http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/compulsory-id-cards-plan-ditched-1725567.html
** http://dematerialisedid.com/PDFs/13439_Safeguarding_Identity_w_opt.pdf
Mum's little sun beam, on her knee (19/02/2010 at 10:51)
Are you really saying that people who work airside don't already carry an ID card with at least the robustness of the current offering? Frightening!
STRETFORDIAN, TRAFFORD (19/02/2010 at 11:10)
PW, Manchester (19/02/2010 at 11:23)
Mark,Radcliffe. (19/02/2010 at 13:55)
Dave Page (Manchester NO2ID) (19/02/2010 at 14:59)
Voluntary signup, this isn't. Lies and coercion, it is.
Andanotherthing, Mcr (19/02/2010 at 16:56)
Cardinal Fang (19/02/2010 at 17:51)
Wow!!! That's a massive 6%!!!
Or to put it another way 94% who are not convinced of the necessity of signing up to a massively intrusive database scheme. Come to think of it - what isn't this the story - "most people DO NOT want an ID Card"?
Deejay, Bury (20/02/2010 at 18:53)
Oh and those 1,000 people are probably those who were "required" to sign up. Forgive me... the airport doesn't deem them "compulsory" but tells you that you can't work there if you don't.
RT, UK (21/02/2010 at 10:43)
Not forgetting all the civil penalties (fines) attached to having this Big Brother Card.