Cops have launched an internet campaign against plans to force officers to wear name badges - so revealing their identities to those they lock up – but have signed up to the public protest using their names and pictures.
More than 350 people, many believed to be Greater Manchester Police officers, have joined a Facebook group opposing a plan by Chief Constable Peter Fay to introduce name badges, which they say will put them at risk.
Officers believe the name badges could allow criminals to track them down – but some seem to have forgotten this risk in their campaign and appear to use real names and pictures on the social networking website.
The M.E.N. revealed on Friday how cash-strapped GMP was spending £21,000 on the badges for virtually all its 8,100 cops and 4,000 civilian staff.
Within hours the Facebook group had been set up and by Monday it had 350 members.
Some even threatened to refuse to wear the badges.
Rebekah Whittaker was one of many who posted comments under what appeared to be a genuine name and picture.
Violent
She wrote: “Is it safe to lock up a violent person who may threaten to track you down... whilst wearing a name badge that gives them free-reign to do just that? Has this really been thought through?
“Although I usually tell victims my name, why should drunks, robbers and paedophiles have a right to know it?”
Aaron Parmar wrote: “They (criminals) get your name, look you up on voters' (register) and do your house or your car over. Yeah, great idea!”
Louise Allen wrote: “The last time I checked we were trying to stop crime not sell someone a car. Ridiculous idea. How about they spend the money on getting us some equipment so we can do our jobs?”
Darren Davies said: “According to those with more than two pips on their shoulder, the people we deal with are our customers! I despair. Don't forget, these days we are supposedly a police service, not a force. It's a wonder they've not proposed 'happy to help' to be printed over our name as well.”
Mick Chisnall wrote: “It's just like the McDonald's badges. You earn stars for politeness, detections, and not leaving sweet wrappers and Coke bottles in Pandas.
“I'm currently on minus two stars.”
Lost the plot
Scott Trimble wrote: “Absolute joke! We have signs up in our toilets at the minute which read 'due to financial restrictions the paper towel dispenser will only be filled once a week'. They can't afford paper towels but they can afford to waste a load of money on something completely pointless like name badges. Someone has really lost the plot this time.”
Sarah Torrance said: “The phrase 'would you like fries with that?' springs to mind!.. I despair!”
GMP is the first force in the country to require all officers to display their names, although others have trialled similar schemes for selected staff.
Plain clothes detectives will not be exempt from wearing the badges, which are similar to those worn by shop assistants and bank clerks.
But police those working undercover or officers wearing riot gear will be allowed to take off the badges.
At the moment, officers are only publicly identified by a collar number woven into their jackets.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Panzer 391, Salford (09/02/2010 at 11:24)
d1v1s1onby0, Wigan (09/02/2010 at 11:32)
Vote for David, tory land (09/02/2010 at 11:45)
2 if one becomes detached there is no photo to ID it as in a driving licence.
All the client needs is the police number. This just another nail in gordons "coffin" at the next election
power to the people uk (09/02/2010 at 11:50)
colbee, Manchester (09/02/2010 at 11:55)
This, and the 'story-telling' fiasco, is just the top-floor flying circus performers fiddling round the edges because they know no better; it is such an attitude that got them where they are so, of course, they are encouraged.
colbee
Ace Riley, outsidethebox (09/02/2010 at 11:57)
lewnicrebell, manchester (09/02/2010 at 12:05)
Black Flag (09/02/2010 at 12:12)
Don't forget - nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
lewnicrebell, manchester (09/02/2010 at 12:26)
david bakey (09/02/2010 at 12:45)
Father Time, Elsewhere (09/02/2010 at 12:54)
d1v1s1onby0, Wigan (09/02/2010 at 12:55)
Cheers mate - i have signed up to show my support
Peter M, Mcr (09/02/2010 at 13:05)
d1v1s1onby0, Wigan (09/02/2010 at 13:10)
There is a huge differance between having your name on the internet as a cop - and having it displayed 6 inches away from the nose of the violent scrote you have just nicked.
Also not everyone on that facebook group will be a cop (As an example - I am not)
Father Time, Elsewhere (09/02/2010 at 13:26)
The difference now is that instead of having their names on badges that they can take off their names are now published in a major regional newspaper and on the Internet for the whole world to see. Well done cops again!
Pandora (09/02/2010 at 14:03)
colbee, Manchester (09/02/2010 at 15:23)
There is also a number of people, having regard to our multi-ethnicity, whose names are much longer than most of us are used to or are difficult to pronounce.
Bearing this in mind, perhaps the genius behind this idea could enlighten those of us who don't see the point of it as to how it will work. By the way, how did the cost get reduced from £42k to £21k - both figures were reported in the MEN which explicitly supported the initiative in its Leader column.
Marquis de Sade et la petit monge tout (09/02/2010 at 15:23)
Almighty God, Salford - vote Green (09/02/2010 at 16:27)
I Am Cornholio (09/02/2010 at 16:52)
How stupid are SOME of these cops,
Fair enough to not wanting your name on a badge,
BUT
to sign up to an open public group and making comments that clearly show you are a cop,
with name, picture (some including family members), links to profiles etc is asking for trouble,
Well done numptys !!!
me from manchester, manchester (09/02/2010 at 17:13)
Sensible Stockport (09/02/2010 at 17:42)
Ace Riley, outsidethebox (09/02/2010 at 18:07)
Ledbury Lad (09/02/2010 at 19:07)
Jo Jones (09/02/2010 at 22:40)