FULL-BODY scanners being trialled at Manchester Airport are to be made compulsory at all British airports in a crackdown on security following the Christmas day bomb plot.
More than 500 people have used the full body scanner at Manchester – which shows the passengers 'naked' – nstead of the traditional pat down since the machines were introduced six weeks ago.
Government officials will take the first step towards changing EU policy to make the scanners compulsory at a meeting this week.
They will also look at introducing two separate body searches for all passengers, with the second check taking place at the gate just before boarding.
Gordon Brown has ordered the body scanning technology in the wake of the alleged failed Detroit airline bomb plot by Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
Mr Brown said: “First of all in airports people will see gradually being brought in the use of a full body scanners.
“They will see checks for explosives traces that will be done on hand luggage. Transit passengers will also be checked as well as transfer passengers.
“We will do everything in our power to tighten up on security that is essential.
“We have recognised that there are now forms of weapon that are being used by al Qaida and we have got to respond accordingly.”
Pioneering
The £80,000 RapiScan machine, which is being trialled at Manchester airport for 12 months, allows staff to spot any hidden explosives or weapons without passengers having to undress.
Security officials in the United States have pioneered their use at New York and Los Angeles airports, and they are gradually being rolled out in other airports in the country.
Currently people who are catching a connecting flight – described as being in transit - do not have to have go through security in some countries.
But the alleged attempt by Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to try to bring down the Detroit-bound flight, has prompted a major review of airport security around the world.
A spokesman for the department of transport said officials would be raising the issue of airport scanners at the EU transport council.
He said there was no time table for their introduction but added: “We are looking at the roll out of scanners across UK.
“As part of this it remains to be seen if there will be more scanners at Manchester once all the legal and operational requirements have been completed.”
Some experts believe the type of explosive allegedly concealed under Mr Abdulmutallab's clothing would have been detected by the full body scanner currently being piloted at Manchester but critics say the technology cannot identify low density items like liquid and powder.
Airport bosses say the tide of public opinion is changing with passengers increasingly accepting of the device.
A team of researchers conducted a survey of travellers from December 21-23, with 75 per cent agreeing to go through the scanner.
But when they repeated the exercise after the failed attack, they found 92 per cent were willing to use the machine.
An airport spokesman said: “We are trialling imaging technology because we believe it could improve our passengers' experience of airport security.
“Very early indications are that the scanners are quicker than the existing security regime and that passenger acceptance levels are high before and after going through the process.
“We need more data before drawing any firm conclusions but, so far, we are pleased with the results.”
Back in November, concerns were raised that the scanner produces invasive images, with the technology able to show up breast enlargements, false limbs and piercings.
The machines also caused controversy with bosses having a re-think on allowing under-18s to undergo the check after child protection experts warned that their security workers risked breaking the law by creating
'indecent' images of juveniles.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Crumpsall-Lass, Crumpsall (03/01/2010 at 19:13)
The Worst thing is that by introducing these measures, the terrorists win.
Perhaps next the government (Camerons Blue Tories or Browns Pink Tories) will bring back internment for anybody that doesn't support their colonial wars.
citycentre, manchester (03/01/2010 at 20:10)
Would it not be as well to find out before spending millions on them?
gillykins, urmston (03/01/2010 at 20:39)
BLUE NOSE (03/01/2010 at 22:11)
When in Rome (03/01/2010 at 23:33)
Nobody wants to be seen naked at airport scanners but these evil islamists have brought forward this situation, if this is the future of flying then so be it, what other altenative is there, oh there is one, which is ignore the situation or play it down like anyone that leans to the left usually does.
Has anybody got any better ideas ?
steve wilson (03/01/2010 at 23:36)
citycentre, manchester (04/01/2010 at 09:35)
The ultimate conclusion of your argument, that we must enforce whatever restrictions are needed to stop radical islamists trying to blow things up would be to force the population to subscribe to Wahabi Islam.
citycentre, manchester (04/01/2010 at 09:42)
The government has already spent over 5 billion on the id card scheme, the LSE estimated that setting up the computer database of out information will cost around 20 billion. Even zealot Nu Labour types can not still think government can spend money without it coming from somewhere, so were will it come from if the cards are free?
Dont forget that any business or police force wanting to use the cards to check id will need the machines to do so, who do you think will pay for those?
Black Flag (04/01/2010 at 09:48)
There's something mildly amusing about the fact that the government has worked so hard to exert control over the population using the twin tools of paedophile hysteria and terrorism hysteria that it's tied itself in knots by implying that both things are lurking everywhere.
ansel, Manchester (04/01/2010 at 11:37)
As for the Children, I would stongly object to any of my Grandchildren being seen in this manner, it just isn't right.
Gary SK13- , Glossop SK13 (04/01/2010 at 13:11)
Mr Bean to you, Manc Land (04/01/2010 at 14:28)
As for the issue with children, my own opinion would be that if the child is over 6/7 years of age then they should only be scanned by their own sex.
Another issue which that hasn’t been raised yet, is the scanning of disabled passengers (in wheelchairs) and babies in prams, now at present they are ushered to the side of the AMD (Archway Metal Detectors) and physically searched by the relevant sex security officer.
ansel, Manchester (04/01/2010 at 15:07)
Maybe to alleviate passenger’s fears that fly through the airport would be to have 2 different scanning booths, one for females and one for males, and the airport security operator would only be able to see their own sex? This is the procedure now regarding body searches of sexes.
As for the issue with children, my own opinion would be that if the child is over 6/7 years of age then they should only be scanned by their own sex.
Now these are really good ideas I'm sure it would make the situation more tolerable.
as for you
Gary SK13- , Glossop SK13
There is no need to be so sarcastic, it may not bother you but I can assure you it bothers a lot of people as well as myself.
I also wonder as the terrorists seem to by pass every other secutity measure that is implemented, how long it will take them to get passed this one.
andy waytomakeacomment, Greater Manchester (04/01/2010 at 16:55)
e.g. do the scanners detect ceramic materials?
Crumpsall-Lass, Crumpsall (04/01/2010 at 17:11)
Mr Bean to you, Manc Land (04/01/2010 at 17:23)
Theoracle, manchester (04/01/2010 at 18:49)
Are you taking the micky or what with comments like that? If not then get off your liberal high horse!!
So next time someone tries to blow up a plane you can turn round and say ' At least pre-op' transsexual or hermaphrodite using these scanners wont be offended'
I think its time you start taking your medication!
When in Rome (04/01/2010 at 19:38)
TISS (04/01/2010 at 21:42)
to the point, bury (05/01/2010 at 11:09)
so let the computer software watch, then alert security.
Black Flag (05/01/2010 at 12:12)
Install the Taliban as absolute rulers of the UK. That would presumably satisfy the people who carry out attacks on aircraft. It would certainly be a lot more effective than these silly pointless scanners. Are you up for that?
The idea that they have to be stopped at all costs is pathetic and cowardly. As Ben Franklin said, those who would sacrifice essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither.
citycentre, manchester (05/01/2010 at 14:50)
Would I be right in assuming you were not in full agreement? But if not at what point do we stop sacrificing the liberties which make our society what it is in order to appease terrorists?
Although on re-reading you initial message it seems I may have read into it more than was actually there.
Rod Perrin (05/01/2010 at 15:12)
Deejay, Bury (05/01/2010 at 16:56)
This is yet another erosion of personal liberty, and serves no additional purpose. It can detect nothing that current scanners cannot already do. As a strip search has to be sanctioned by an authorised officer, this type of machine is circumventing the law.
Black Flag (05/01/2010 at 18:41)
If you're so much of a bed-wetter that you can't cope with travelling unless other passengers are subjected to paedo-scanners, stay at home.
It works both ways.