THE national identity card scheme was in chaos last night as an M.E.N investigation revealed some of the country’s biggest travel companies are telling customers that they can not be used instead of passports.
Some 1,736 people in Greater Manchester have bought the £30 cards after the Home Office promised they could be used to travel in Europe.
But customer service staff at nine major travel companies – including British Airways, Eurostar and BMI baby – told M.E.N reporters posing as customers that the cards could NOT be used instead of passports.
Eight of the nine companies later issued statements saying staff had given the wrong advice – and that the cards COULD be used after all. But Eurostar remained unsure. A spokesman said: “We are unable to confirm whether the ID cards are valid on Eurostar at this time.”
Meanwhile two major German airlines said they would not accept the cards until they had been officially recognised by the German federal authorities.
The revelations will come as a major embarrassment to the Home Office, which has already been forced to water down its ID card scheme. The cards were originally proposed to be compulsory. But after a public outcry they are now being championed by ministers as useful for students wanting to prove their age – and travellers wanting to get to Europe without a passport.
The cards are being trialled in Greater Manchester before being brought in across the country next year.
M.E.N reporters contacted the customer service desks of 12 airlines and ferry companies, as well as Eurostar, asking whether they could travel to Europe with an ID card alone. Only four of companies – Ryanair, Easyjet, Brittany Ferries and KLM – said the ID cards were sufficient. Staff at Eurostar, BMI Baby, British Airways, DFDS Seaways, Stena Line, Sea France, Lufthansa, Monarch Airlines and Eurolines said a passport would also be needed.
Confusion
The confusion mounted when spokesmen for all the companies except Eurostar later issued statements saying the cards could be used after all.
Two airlines – German Wings and Air Berlin – said they would definitely NOT accept ID cards as travel documents.
A P&O spokesman said: “We weren't aware of the trial of these ID cards. The Home Office did not communicate this scheme to us. UK Borders Agency at Hull told us they weren't aware of the trial either.”
The Home Office say they told P&O repeatedly about the scheme.
Chris Grayling, the shadow Home Secretary, said the M.E.N's revelations showed the ID card scheme had become ‘a complete farce’ and should be scrapped.
A spokesman for the Identity and Passport Service (IPS) said “The National Identity Card is a valid document for travel and is as good as a passport in Europe.
“We expect all carriers in the UK to accept National Identity Cards for travel as a legal duty and we are confident that the vast majority of travellers will have no problems using their Identity Card as a travel document.”

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
CorneredAllTheLuck, Tameside (23/12/2009 at 09:02)
Just say no to big brother.
mx5 (23/12/2009 at 09:16)
Roadrunner, Irlam (23/12/2009 at 09:25)
Rest assured NuLab will see this as a resounding success and and an excuse to impose this ID Card con on the entire population.
Chris R, Irlam (23/12/2009 at 09:28)
Dearie me - you want to read up on things a bit more before (literally) signing your life away....
I know a Nigerian chap who needs to transfer a large sum of money into this country, he is offering a large cut to whoever supplies him with their bank account details. Want to help?
Mike S, Manchester (23/12/2009 at 09:38)
Just another confirmation of how out of touch the government is with the country. Get 'em out!
danny coleman (23/12/2009 at 09:58)
EricH, Horwich (23/12/2009 at 10:09)
Absolutely ridiculous.
Mark, South Manchester (23/12/2009 at 10:22)
Are they only interested in the travel plight of Londoners, or what??
Anglosaxon, Norden (23/12/2009 at 10:25)
Mark,Radcliffe. (23/12/2009 at 10:36)
minority report, Derby, UK (23/12/2009 at 10:48)
My passport does not hold my fingerprints nor any other biometric data, because I have renewed it before the deadline for the government's sneaky plan to force the ID system onto us by the backdoor.
The Home Office has "designated " passports which means that you will have to undergo the same interrogation (50 personal, including many intrusive, questions) at an interrogation centre and be compelled to keep the authorities informed of changes in your life and location, as you would for an ID Card. This is because ID Cards are so unpopular that the government had to back off making them compulsory. But Home Office civil servants who have planned the system for 30 years will not let us escape their plans so easily. So they are trying to make the passport do the job of the ID Card.
If New Labour win the next election, they will designate more situations, such as benefit claiming, job seeking, employment, opening bank a account, insurance, and many more, so that you will not be able to live a normal life without an ID Card / passport. Passports used to be voluntary, but once you are in this ID system you are in for life. Failure to keep data updated will be punishable by hefty fines.
The ID system was condemned by the government's own Gateway Review because it broke all 10 of the principles set to protect us; such as being only to verify identity, should not involve government, no databases to be kept, no biometric data, each person to own their own data, no data sharing without permission of owner, and others. When people tried to use the FoI to access the results of the review, Gordon Brown tried to block access, in defiance of the Information Commissioner and the Information Tribunal.
Cosmo Disney (23/12/2009 at 10:49)
Casablanca, ex-Bury Road Convent, Rochdale (23/12/2009 at 11:14)
You are right, it has not appeared on any news bulletin that I know of. Considering some of the trivia that does appear on TV news, this should be a major item - one of the government's flagship plans failing so miserably should be top news.
It makes you wonder whose interests the BBC and other TV broadcasters are protecting, ours or the government's? I have noticed a lack of criticism by them all of ID Cards, and in TV discussions there is a failure to ask ministers any of the questions raised by opponents of ID Cards.
MPs gravy train, UK (23/12/2009 at 11:16)
NWmancCUB (23/12/2009 at 11:24)
Mark smith (23/12/2009 at 11:41)
The other 'great' use of the card is supposedly for young people to prove their age for bars and clubs, if major travel companys dont even accept them without a passport what chances are there of a bar or club who have probably never seen a real ID card so will assume its probably fake anyway and still ask for a driving license or passport. I wonder what the position is of those who signed up and now find its as useful as an expired credit card on getting a refund back from the gov for their useless peice of plastic
Casablanca, ex-Bury Road Convent, Rochdale (23/12/2009 at 11:52)
The reason is that the ID Card's purpose has been changed many times since David Blunkett first announced it. Each government claim for ID Cards has been demolished by opposing arguments. The cards were to combat terrorism, combat crime, combat benefit fraud, combat illegal immigration, help drinkers prove their age; make travel easier, etc.
The real reason for ID Cards is that two teams of Whitehall civil servants have been planning and pushing them since the 1970s - they tried to persuade the Thatcher government to impose them, but she refused. Blair and Brown and their Home Secretaries loved the chance to intrude, track and control the public. Then they had to find a reason. Brown even tried to block public disclosure that the Gateway Review had condemned the scheme for breaking the government's 10 principles.
They should abolish the whole folly, but having wasted £7 billion on the system - with more to come - and New Labour being unable to listen or admit mistakes, the government has to come up with some face-saving formula to keep imposing them.
St_JJ, Widnes (23/12/2009 at 11:52)
Went to Wembley in '56, USA (23/12/2009 at 12:24)
Paul Manchester (23/12/2009 at 12:36)
Englisc Stannes, North Manchester (23/12/2009 at 12:57)
danny coleman (23/12/2009 at 13:17)
nyb, ex manc (23/12/2009 at 13:32)
Black Flag (23/12/2009 at 13:33)
And a complete waste of £30 at that. You made a point of saying that they cost less than a passport, but as you have to have a passport before you can get an ID card, the cost of getting an ID card is £30 more than the cost of getting just a passport.
Vote for David, anywhere else but manchester please (23/12/2009 at 14:49)