A RELIGIOUS education teacher who had sex with a teenage boy has been jailed for 32 months.
Madeleine Martin, 39, pleaded guilty to 10 counts of causing a teenage boy to engage in sexual activity in February this year.
She was jailed at Minshull Street Crown Court, Manchester.
Martin - of Grassfield Way, Knutsford – qualified as a teacher in 2005 and met her victim in September 2008.
Networking
They began communicating on a networking website and in the following couple of months the contact between the two turned sexual.
The relationship lasted for a week before the boy decided he did not want to keep seeing Martin.
“Martin's actions will leave emotional scars on her victim and his family."Detective Sergeant Dave Moores
He eventually told his mother what had happened – and she called the police.
Justice
Detective Sergeant Dave Moores, of Greater Manchester Police, said: “Martin's actions will leave emotional scars on her victim and his family and have also impacted on the wider community.
“I would like to praise the bravery of the victim in speaking out and ensuring justice was done for him.
“I am satisfied that she has been given the sentence she deserves and hope this will send a strong message that this abusive behaviour will not be tolerated. Martin will also remain on the Sex Offenders' Register."

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
BlueBoy1 , Bolton (25/11/2009 at 13:44)
Dzenko, Manchester (25/11/2009 at 13:48)
Rob Wilson (25/11/2009 at 13:48)
Woman attacks 4 on cctv after a string of other offences and walks free!!!!
Tezza, Tyldesley (25/11/2009 at 13:53)
A man in the midlands in February this year was jailed for 4 and half years for having sex with a 14 year old girl.
So why the difference?
tiggerluc, somewhere in shaw (25/11/2009 at 14:02)
Mrs Jammy, Sitting on the settee (25/11/2009 at 14:18)
Anthony Browne (25/11/2009 at 14:32)
Have an affiar= prison.
Smash someone's face in=walk free!!!
Is It Me? (25/11/2009 at 14:36)
rocketmanu, Ex Old Trafford (25/11/2009 at 14:54)
Is It Me?,
25/11/2009 at 14:36
Amen brother, so would I. Also, "10 counts"!
This lad knew what he was doing but then again so did she so I've no sympathy. However, had he been a few months older she wouldn't have been nick now!
Careless Whisper (25/11/2009 at 15:03)
emma (25/11/2009 at 15:16)
Of Denton, Tameside (25/11/2009 at 15:21)
Will this one get published or has MEN black-balled me??
Brook Lands (25/11/2009 at 15:23)
What would you say if this was a male teacher and female student? The same?
nostalgic old man (25/11/2009 at 15:24)
This is not a crime. This lad will probably be more scarred by knowing that telling his Mum sent his ex-bird to jail than by that one wonderful week he had with her.
tiggerluc, somewhere in shaw (25/11/2009 at 15:25)
16 is still the legal age of consent last time i looked.
PW, Manchester (25/11/2009 at 15:27)
dessie, manchester (25/11/2009 at 15:35)
Brook Lands (25/11/2009 at 15:37)
PW
This is not about the boy, it's about the adult taking advantage of a not yet fully mature kid, whatever schoolboy fantasies are I think that 9 times out of 10 this kind of thing may seem fantastic to begin with for him but in the end it will cause damage.
Anything from bullying from other pupils up to having a child at an early age or like in this case having to go to court.
The boy finished it so obviously it couldn't have been that great.
Careless Whisper (25/11/2009 at 15:48)
Lotte Smith (25/11/2009 at 15:51)
Furthermore, the boy was 15 which makes the case different from many in the news at the moment where those involved have been younger. Both sought comfort from their problems and found it in each other. From the reports I've read - and I've read many - there was nothing forced about the relationship and when they decided to end it - after a week - it ended. Whilst of course, Mrs Martin was in the wrong and neglected her role as a person of trust, the boy has no doubt suffered because of the media attention and the police involvement in what appears to have been a short relationship which ended on mutual grounds.
I am probably biased because I know Mrs Martin and have done for years. This incident is completely out of character and she has suffered endless since it all came to light. As such, this sentence is more than just punishment and claims that she should face the likes of a ten year sentence are ridiculous. There are far worse offenders out their who have been given lesser sentences than this...
Andanotherthing, Mcr (25/11/2009 at 15:56)
What stupid juvenile and sexist comments to make. You are not little boys anymore you are men. God help your children especially the females. They would get precious little sympathy from you were they ever sexually abused.
Of Denton, Tameside (25/11/2009 at 16:06)
if you think there is such a thing as a 16 year old virgin in 21st Century Britain then you are very niave - i bet most kids lose their virginity at 14 or younger these days, what with the internet and adult subscription channels on satellite & cable.
Saddleworth is Blue (25/11/2009 at 16:06)
What would you say if this was a male teacher and female student? The same?
Brook Lands
25/11/2009 at 15:23
Brooklands - does it matter that it was a female teacher or vice versa ?
What would you say ?
tiggerluc, somewhere in shaw (25/11/2009 at 16:37)
Of Denton, Tameside (25/11/2009 at 16:37)
When i was at school all the 14 year old girls were having sex with 25 year old boyfriends, and i went to a catholic school!