A man whose barking dog disturbed his neighbours for more than 18 months has been fined £450.
Shahid Hussain, 36, ignored warnings from Rochdale council to keep the noise down.
He was prosecuted after a catalogue of complaints about the dog, which barked day and night while it was chained up in the yard of Hussain's house.
Absence
Hussain didn't turn up to court and the case was heard in his absence.
He had been warned on several occasions by environmental health officers after complaints dating back to August 2007.
Hussain was served with a noise abatement notice ordering him to keep the animal quiet.
[blockquote name=Councillor Ted Flynn]
"Noise nuisance is something that gets people really frustrated, so it's important we take it seriously."
[/blockquote]
But in April officers witnessed a breach of the notice and he was summonsed to court.
Excuse
Hussain was unable to provide any reasonable excuse as to why the animal was causing the disturbance and could provide no evidence that he had taken practical steps to minimise the annoyance.
He was found guilty by magistrates on one count of breaching the noise abatement notice and was fined £450 plus he was ordered to pay £150 in costs.
Councillor Ted Flynn, cabinet member for community safety on Rochdale Council, said: “Noise nuisance is something that gets people really frustrated, so it's important we take it seriously.
Action
“We'll tackle those people continually causing such anti-social behaviour in our neighbourhoods - and that means taking court action where appropriate if the noise doesn't stop.”
Andy Glover, public protection manager at Rochdale Council, added: “The noise from barking dogs is one of the most commonly complained about causes of nuisances.
“Most pet owners do not realise the law requires them to take responsibility for noise caused by pets and where it's causing a disturbance they have an obligation to minimise it.”
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 15 and replies | View All
Brook Lands (25/11/2009 at 12:30)
It may be 33 yrs but it will never be 37yrs. (25/11/2009 at 12:56)
This man should have been dragged into court by ignoring his summons he is two fingering the law; people have been inconvenienced by this guy’s dog which he is responsible for he also showed contempt towards the law and £450 fine is pathetic.
Dzenko, Manchester (25/11/2009 at 13:46)
Mrs Jammy, Sitting on the settee (25/11/2009 at 14:25)
Acid, Chadderton (25/11/2009 at 15:04)
I beg to differ Mr Glover. Most pet owners do know the law and ARE responsible enough to look after their pets in a manner that prevents them causing a disturbance. Plenty of dogs in my street and they only seem to bark when someone approaches the house. Job done!
Careless Whisper (25/11/2009 at 15:54)
a dictata in superbia , Manchester (25/11/2009 at 22:24)
Spellbound , N Yorks (25/11/2009 at 23:21)
This guy kept his dog chained day and night? He obviously didn't care about it then and as such should not be allowed to keep any animals.
Careless Whisper
How about chaining Hussain screaming all night and day in the yard. See how he likes it. Cruel git!
I am in full agreement with you both and couldn’t have put it better myself!!!
sugar n spice, manchester (26/11/2009 at 00:41)
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (26/11/2009 at 13:08)
And a friend of mine had a dog called Orpheus, because it didn't offenbach, (lets see how many people get that one).
Abra Cadaver (26/11/2009 at 13:39)
26/11/2009 at 00:41"
I'm not too sure, but I think that the law says that the animal only needs to have access to water (and maybe food) whilst it is kept outdoors. Bad I know and, if I'm right, it definitely needs changing.
Pandora (26/11/2009 at 16:25)
FyberOptyx, Tameside (26/11/2009 at 21:48)
Rebecca Rabinowitz (26/11/2009 at 23:05)
Dae, Manchester (27/11/2009 at 09:40)
There has to be some form of shelter from the weather as well, be it a kennel, an open shed, or a porch.