A COUNCIL which boasts of its rural credentials is planning to use 98 acres of green belt land - about 56 Old Trafford football pitches - for industrial use.
Salford council has earmarked the land at Barton Moss, on the Eccles and Irlam border, to attract companies to the borough.
It would mean either Grade 1 agricultural land or Boysnope Park golf course being ripped up to provide warehousing and other industry.
The site is to the west of City Airport Manchester - formerly Barton Aerodrome.
Residents and opposition Tories have strongly criticised the proposal.
In 2005 a tongue-in-cheek poster used as part of a national advertising campaign stated: `There's Tons of Grass in Salford' and explained that 60 per cent of the borough was green with nature reserves, mossland, and hundreds of acres of parks.'
The new plan for the green belt land is included in the draft Core Strategy report, which outlines the council's planning vision up to 2027.
Essential
The report says most of the city's development needs can be met within the urban area but there is an 'essential' need to release the land at Barton.
It adds: "If this land was not released then Salford would not be able to achieve its economic growth objectives, instead seeing a reduction in the amount of industrial and warehouse development in the city and being heavily reliant on older employment areas that will find it increasingly difficult to attract investment and modern businesses.
"The release of this part of green belt is therefore essential for the future prosperity of the city and its residents."
As 'compensation', 98 acres of land on the western side of Little Hulton will be designated as new green belt.
Tory councillor Iain Lindley, who is also prospective Conservative MP for Worsley and Eccles South, said: "Green belt land is a green lung for our local communities and these proposals would remove almost all open space between Irlam and Peel Green. The A57 along the Barton stretch is already operating beyond capacity.
"Local residents are already having to cope with Port Salford, the Reds Stadium and a likely upgrade of Barton Airport, without the destruction of 40 hectares of Green Belt land on their doorstep."
Deadline
"I urge all local residents in Irlam, Cadishead and Peel Green to respond to the Core Strategy consultation before the January deadline" The council's planning boss, Coun Derek Antrobus, said: "This is needed to ensure that future generations have access to decent jobs.
"There will be a shortage of good quality employment land and an extensive search has identified Barton as the only area capable of meeting the need. Our plans maintain the existing scale of the greenbelt and make amendments involving 1.2 per cent of the city's greenbelt to offer a more prosperous future for our children."
Tweet
Salford wants to build on green belt land
November 19, 2009
Salford council has earmarked the land at Barton Moss, on the Eccles and Irlam border, to attract companies to the borough.

Showing comments 1 to 14 and replies | View All
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (19/11/2009 at 08:25)
Barton? What about the Irwell valley or rip up Worsley golf course, oh sorry! that's too near the councellors homes.
Jiggerz, Mancunia (19/11/2009 at 08:44)
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (19/11/2009 at 13:02)
Knowall, stretford end (19/11/2009 at 14:34)
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead
can you ask them for this weeks lottery numbers as they seem to know everything, nice to see that the tories are against salfords new ground and a project to bring more jobs to salford.
salfordrat (19/11/2009 at 14:41)
What needs to happen is protests to start now, as they would in the south of the country, before they have all the plans signed and sealed. Cause a headache before it is too late.
J.Hall, Tameside (19/11/2009 at 16:22)
In the Greater Manchester region there are numerous thousands of empty commercial properties,warehouses,manufacturing units,offices and storage units,for sale,to let,for rent for lease etc etc,because Labour Councils and their members qualify success by obliterating City centres,
and any open spaces available.
No wonder the region is officially designated as one of the worst air polluted regions in Europe,and has the lowest tree cover in Europe at 6%,plus the most traffic congested roads in Europe,which add up to the"absolute fact" that people and childred are suffering serious diseasesv with the highest mortality rates in the UK resulting in the average life span in Greater Manchester being 7 years less than the national average with the strong links with air pollution PM2.5 Particulates which are filling our lungs daily.Just "check for yourself" if you need conclusive proof by simply searching "Particulates and Human Health"and read the confirmed facts.
After voting Labour 40 years my eyes have been opened to Labours stampede to destroy your environment because they are callous and favour Developers not the Electorate.
No Councillor in Greater Manchester would ever have the bottle to take me on in an open debate because after 15 years of fact finding, their rhetoric would be exposed as absolute tripe.
Goblin, Eccles, Manchester (19/11/2009 at 20:21)
The fact is that the Councillors and Town Planners of Salford, for the most part, are embarrassed by all this untidy green stuff with unleashed wild creatures running around in it. Some talk of "going green" and sourcing vegetables locally, yet give no aid or encouragement to local farmers. On the contrary, they pander to every whim of our local [owned from Saudi Arabia and the Isle of Man], property developer, Peel Holdings.
This monolith owns Salford Quays [ where much public money has been diverted from needy areas to make a monument to Councillors' vanity], the Trafford Centre [built on Greenbelt, a good working farm], the Ship Canal [much of the banks developed as posh housing, more to come], the Bridgewater Canal [ditto] and virtually ALL the land between these waterways. So, with a supine majority of the Council besotted and flattered by a company of such grandeur, why are we not surprised if yet another Planning Permission Application is approved?
The value of these 80 hectares as agricultural land is no more than £350,000. With such planning permission it is in the millions ! So , drinks all round at Peel, Salford gets the money, or at least "support" for another playground for the rich at Greengate , to rival the real city on the other side of the river.
Greenbelt under threat in Salford ? ALL of it.
Peel await the decision of the Secretary of State, in February, on their Racecourse, Equestrian Centre, Golf Course extravaganza on Chat Moss which will alienate a huge area to wildlife. It would also cause the greatest traffic chaos in the country at the Worsley Interchange. Then there is the Salford Port , City Reds Stadium and this new proposition - all of them on the A57, the artery between Manchester via Eccles, to Irlam and Cadishead. Already this road is at saturation point.
Other correspondents have pointed out the thousands of derelict Brownfield sites in Salford where such "job creation" would be better placed. But no, Green sites are easier, cheaper [ie owned by Peel] and in conjunction with their other developments [and need to have their value enhanced by conversion from agricultural use].
In the capitalist utopia that seems to be the Peel vision, no blade of grass is safe, no bird may fly. What do they matter when profit lies dormant in the soil, dreaming of birth to a world of cement, bricks and tarmac?
Shame on them and shame on a Council that facilitates such vandalism.
Flat Dweller, Eccles
Paul Peters (19/11/2009 at 20:43)
Steve Millington (19/11/2009 at 21:15)
Goblin, Eccles, Manchester (20/11/2009 at 10:20)
Flat Dweller
Eccles
Goblin, Eccles, Manchester (20/11/2009 at 10:37)
Lancashire 4ever, Pendlebury, Manchester, Lancashire (21/11/2009 at 21:50)
Very good posting, "Goblin, Eccles, Manchester", keep up the pressure, I'm right behind you on this one me old son. Salford Council are POWER MAD - FREEDOM to the enslaved four towns!
jackie anderson (25/11/2009 at 21:41)
http://apps.facebook.com/causes/405250
http://apps.facebook.com/causes/405250http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=201970218853&ref=ts
christine smith (28/11/2009 at 10:59)