CHILDREN under the age of 10 - and as young as three - are responsible for up to five crimes a week across Greater Manchester, the M.E.N can reveal today.
Officers have recorded hundreds of crimes a year by children too young to be prosecuted - including arson attacks, sexual and racial assaults, firearms offences, knife crime and even rape.
More than 1,200 offences by the under 10s have been logged by Greater Manchester Police in the past five years, revealing a 'hidden problem' of criminal behaviour in young children across the region.
They include sexual offences committed by kids as young as five and assaults by three-year-olds. Because youngsters under 10 are beneath the legal age of criminal responsibility they cannot be cautioned, charged or prosecuted. Many escape with a telling-off from police in front of their parents.
An average of 243 crimes-a-year - and up to five-a-week - were logged in the five years from 2004 to 2008, with another 27 recorded in the first three months of this year. Among the most shocking incidents are:
- A three-year-old who carried out a racial assault occasioning actual bodily harm in Salford
- A five-year-old who caused or incited another child, a girl, to engage in sexual activity in Bury
- A seven-year-old who caused arson with intent to endanger life in Wigan
- A nine-year-old raped another child in Manchester
Scores of children, as young as four, are listed for criminal damage, common assault, shoplifting and public order offences. Five three-year-olds are listed - one for racial assault, one for common assault and three for damage to a vehicle.
Manchester Blackley MP Graham Stringer said he feared the figures were just the tip of the iceberg of a 'hidden problem'. He said: "It's really a problem with the parents. Some of the things these children are accused of are very serious and I think there needs to be more police intervention in the shape of parenting orders or even looking at taking children into care.
"What we can't do is pretend there's not a problem and leave dangerous children in limbo.
"This is a significant problem and what these figures expose is that it's a far bigger problem than people may have thought."
Mr Stringer said he would be asking questions in parliament on how the problem can be tackled in parliament but was not in favour of lowering the age of criminal culpability.
Det Supt Phil Owen, of Greater Manchester Police, explained: "If we come across a juvenile under the age of ten who has committed a crime, we can take appropriate steps to refer them to social services and other agencies.
He added: "It is always very disappointing when young children are involved in crime and I think there is a wider responsibility for all agencies to respond, not just to the needs of the victim, but also the offender."
A Manchester council spokesperson added: "Where we become aware of acts of a criminal nature by children as part of the work we do with families we work to support parents in dealing with these aspects of their child's behaviour."
The Youth Justice Board, which carries out preventative work with children aged eight and above, said said: "Prevention is always better than cure. We know that if young people haven't committed a crime by 14 years of age then it's unlikely that they ever will. With facts like these and the considerable savings to local businesses, not to mention the courts, it is clear why targeted prevention is a sensible approach."
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (17/11/2009 at 08:39)
Andanotherthing, Mcr (17/11/2009 at 08:43)
I would not call this problem Hidden and it has been going on for a lot longer than five years. Parents.
Brook Lands (17/11/2009 at 08:55)
Sadly the kids that are commiting sexual assualts are probably being abused themselves, they should be taken into care for their own protection and their families investigated, it's very rare for stranger abuse, much more likely a family member.
Maybe if a child is not of criminal responsible age then their parents/guardian should be held responsible, perhaps then they'd be more responsible raising them.
keyjockey, Manchester (17/11/2009 at 09:14)
Jay B, oldham (17/11/2009 at 09:18)
child protection laws protect them from the law. so they basically can get away with murder. but thats been the case for years.
its just that most kids know this now and flowt the law.
Mark,Radcliffe. (17/11/2009 at 09:22)
Savage Mandarin, Manchester (17/11/2009 at 09:37)
Yeah, right. Better to make nice than to punish.
gillykins, urmston (17/11/2009 at 09:39)
castlefieldres, manchester (17/11/2009 at 09:52)
However it would be interesting to see how many of these are what I would call 'strange crimes' and wouldn't have been registered at all several years ago.
A racial attack by a three year old? My niece is three and wouldn't know how to commit a racial attack.
Criminal damage by a four year old?
The world has gone mad. Yes there are bad parents but this is a bit sensationalist.
When I was about four, I was with my mum shopping in St Anne's Square. I was bored and looked at the display, there was a light that obviously looked interesting to a kid. I touched it, it was red hot and burnt my hand, I pulled my hand away quickly and the light broke.
What happened then? I was sat down, told off, my mother apologised to the shopkeeper who in turn apologised to my mother for the light not being behind glass or whatever. Everyone moved on.
If that happened now, would I have been done for criminal damage? Would my mother have sued the shopkeeper for injuries to her child?
It works both ways, yes some kids can be more trouble these days. However people's attitude can contribute to that or the sense of that.
Find me an adult in their late 20's or older who didn't light a little fire with twigs in the field or woods with twigs. Would that now be arson?
When small children get into scraps at school, the Police are called more often now and this results in a lot of the figures.
It's all our faults, not just the children and the parents.
Black Flag (17/11/2009 at 10:12)
Also, as three year olds cannot be prosecuted, I'd like to know on what basis these bureaucrats feel they can describe them as guilty of "crimes" when they haven't been brought before a court, let alone convicted.
Andanotherthing, Mcr (17/11/2009 at 10:13)
Criminal damage by a four year old?
Castlefieldres, I have seen with my own eyes a group of "toddlers" from as young as 3 with the oldest being 5 0r six torching cars in Openshaw. I have seen from an office window a very little girl drag a hand pump, expertly drain the diesel from truck while the driver was in his cab. Her parents watched on.
TheRealWorld (17/11/2009 at 10:24)
Do officers not take children home for a clip around the ear any more. I am astounded that officers are getting their pen out for child misdemeanours.
The police are petrified of being sued. Add that to mard parents dialling "999" for child fights, name calling and other tribulations of childhood/growing up and we have a pathetic situation.
I remember running home and hiding in the house when I was 9 because the local bully wanted me a fight. I told my dad and he threw me out of the house and told me not to come home till I had leathered him... Which I did and no one has bullied me since.
Now, if my dad had rung the police I would have grown to be as mard as some of the parents around today.
essex (17/11/2009 at 10:37)
castlefieldres, manchester (17/11/2009 at 10:48)
Criminal damage by a four year old?
Castlefieldres, I have seen with my own eyes a group of "toddlers" from as young as 3 with the oldest being 5 0r six torching cars in Openshaw. I have seen from an office window a very little girl drag a hand pump, expertly drain the diesel from truck while the driver was in his cab. Her parents watched on.
Andanotherthing, Mcr
17/11/2009 at 10:13
----------------------------------------------------
You have not seen a three year old torch a car.
Almighty God, Salford (17/11/2009 at 11:00)
serious business mate, i once seen a group of kittens shooting people at point blank range with shotguns. its a terrible world.
Jay B, oldham (17/11/2009 at 11:02)
smittyh, Blackley, Manchester (17/11/2009 at 11:04)
Hmmm, there's about 1 million children under 16 in Greater Manchester, so let's halve that to half a million to get a guestimate of kids under 10. In a year, 243 crimes are committed by kids. That represents a crime committed by one in every 2,000 children, or 0.05% of the child population. I wonder why the MEN didn't present the stats that way?
I don't know, but I don't consider that a trend. And I think I'll sleep well tonight safe in the knowledge that it is rather unlikely I will be murdered by a toddler.
Andanotherthing, Mcr (17/11/2009 at 11:05)
17/11/2009 at 10:48
I am so glad that you don't believe it, but it's true and reported. You probably would not believe that it was after 11pm either. Lets see if anyone from Higher Openshaw about 9 or 10 years ago finds it to incredible to believe.
Jomov (17/11/2009 at 11:13)
castlefieldres, manchester (17/11/2009 at 11:21)
I am so glad that you don't believe it, but it's true and reported. You probably would not believe that it was after 11pm either. Lets see if anyone from Higher Openshaw about 9 or 10 years ago finds it to incredible to believe.
Andanotherthing, Mcr
17/11/2009 at 11:05
--------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone would believe it.
Perhaps you could explain what this '3yr old' was actually doing?
Did they throw petrol all over the car and then whip out a Zippo, light a cig, and they throw the lighter onto the waiting bomb?
Of Denton, Tameside (17/11/2009 at 11:27)
WAS IT REALLY 37 YEARS, TAMESIDE (17/11/2009 at 11:28)
keyjockey, Manchester
17/11/2009 at 09:14
How very shortsighted - who are you trying to blame? CCTV is a deterrent, not a prevention!! And if it does not deter people from crime, it makes it easier to find and convict the culprit.
I don't have a problem with CCTV, that's because I'm a law abiding citizen. I would also advocate that everyone should be on a DNA database; not because it would stop crime, but again as a deterrent and a tool to make capture and conviction easier. If you have nothing to fear from CCTV/DNA profile then what's the problem?
Anthony , Accrington,Lancashire (17/11/2009 at 11:38)
castlefieldres, manchester (17/11/2009 at 11:49)
We're talking about 0.05% of children being accused, not convicted, of a 'crime' a year. 1 in 2000 children.
Or to hit home more, if you filled Old Trafford with children, only 35 kids from the 70,000 would be accused of a crime by the police.
Why this means kids are untouchable I don't know.
What this has to do with the Geneva Convention and Human Rights, puzzles me. Perhaps you could elbaorate.
Black Flag (17/11/2009 at 11:53)
Potentially everybody has something to fear from it, it's just that the thickos can't see it.