A 16-YEAR-OLD youth, who abducted and tried to rape a child just eight days after walking free from court after being convicted of the rape of another youngster, has been told he will be locked up indefinitely.
The youth, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was told he must serve a minimum term of almost three years before he has any hope of being freed.
Judge Peter Lakin told him: "You will not be released until it is deemed safe to do so and, given all the circumstances, it is very likely that you will not be released for a very considerable time."
Unusual
Passing sentence at Manchester's Minshull Street Crown Court, the judge said it was a highly unusual step to classify such a young offender as dangerous.
He said: "In your case, I have to say I have absolutely no hesitation in reaching the conclusion that you are indeed a dangerous offender."
Father of the victim
"This has completely destroyed our family. It is the worst thing ever...I want to make my son better, make it so it never happened, but I can't."
The court had been told that the youth, described as troubled and vulnerable, had deliberately lured his innocent young victim to his home earlier this year, where he carried out the sexual assault and tried to rape him.
He had tempted him by promising to give him a Star Wars light-sabre toy if he went with him, then attacked him on the pretext of playing a game.
Judge Lakin told him: "In a planned and calculated way, you cynically took advantage of this young boy.
Innocence
"You took away his innocence and what you did had a devastating effect on both him and his family.
"Quite clearly, you have caused him psychological harm and a custodial sentence is the only appropriate one."
In June, eight days before the attack, the 16-year-old had walked free from court after being sentenced to a three-year community rehabilitation order for a previous sex attack involving a boy.
The court was told that Judge Adrian Smith, who had sentenced the teenager on that occasion, had done so after being told that the youngster's family - committed Christians - had forgiven him and expressed the hope that the court would adopt a "corrective" rather than a punitive approach to sentencing.
It was revealed, however, that the teenager had already carried out another sex attack on a boy while on bail awaiting sentence.
Distress
Alaric Bassano, prosecuting, told the Minshull Street court that the offences against the youngster had caused great distress to the boy, devastated his parents and caused a great deal of anger and resentment within the local community.
The youngster had to undergo a distressing medical examination, he had regressed emotionally and his education had suffered.
He told the court the boy's mother had been frantic with worry when her son had disappeared from the garden where he had been playing and, ironically, her husband had later thanked the teenager for his help in returning the boy, knowing nothing of what had happened.
The court was told that, after the attack, the child's parents noticed a significant change in his behaviour and he eventually told them of the attack.
Frustration
His father said in a statement: "This has completely destroyed our family. It is the worst thing ever.
"I am so full of anger and frustration. It should never have happened.
"I want to make my son better, make it so it never happened, but I can't.
"Dads are supposed to support and protect their children, but I couldn't."
In addition to the custodial sentence imposed for the protection of the public, the 16-year-old will be subject to a Sexual Offenders' Prevention Order for an indefinite period and will be subject to supervision by the Independent Safeguarding Authority.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Judge Dredd, Manchester (11/11/2009 at 13:45)
tiggerluc, somewhere in shaw (11/11/2009 at 13:49)
Quentin Turpentine, The Loo (11/11/2009 at 14:16)
Judge Adrian Smith should obviously have the rape of this poor five year old on his conscience - in fact I don't know how he sleeps at night knowing he is to blame in a huge way for this second crime.
As for this new sentence this time round; why is the minimum sentence for this 2nd horific offence not at least 15 years? Forget this "detained indefinitely" crap because I'm personally not interested - I'm only interested that this extremely sick individual could be out in less than 3 years.
Who the hell is running country?
Levenshulme-Blue (11/11/2009 at 14:23)
Why was this sickening attack allowed to take place? If we follow logic, then this rapist should be given another three-year community order because the first crime wasn't serious enough to warrant a jail sentence. Yet it is exactly the same as the second one which, it seems, IS serious enough to warrant a jail sentence. Where is the consistency? Will the original judge, Adrian Smith, receive censure and punishment for failing to deal with this evil miscreant in the correct manner?
The authorities should understand that openness is the way to win back the trust of the public and we should be told the reasoning as to why the original judgment was made. It is the very least the second, brutalised, family deserve.
My heart goes out to them, I don't know how I'd cope if my young daughter was attacked in this way. It just doesn't bear thinking about.
camp bleu, Prestwich (11/11/2009 at 14:25)
Deano 123 (11/11/2009 at 14:36)
annon (11/11/2009 at 14:49)
Sad to see he'll be out just in his prime for grooming/raping more victims!
to the point, bury (11/11/2009 at 14:50)
Why, he has lost all his human rights, so name him.
Ms B, Manchester (11/11/2009 at 14:53)
Englisc Stannes, North Manchester (11/11/2009 at 15:16)
steve grimsley, Perth (11/11/2009 at 15:18)
My thoughts are will the victim and his family.
Suggestion,sue the idiot who passed the first sentence for impersonating a judge.
want to leave, Stretford (11/11/2009 at 15:20)
Britt/Canada (11/11/2009 at 15:22)
Of Denton, Tameside (11/11/2009 at 15:55)
I would hate to be the party in power when the public snaps and decides to take the law in to it's own hands and a 'Peoples' revolution ensues.
The anger and despair about the legal system and a whole host of other issues is at critical mass with regards to the public, and when we eventually decide enough is enough we will make mount etna look like a minor rumble!
Dukinfield Blue, Manchester (11/11/2009 at 16:02)
vinay, rochdale (11/11/2009 at 16:06)
Brock, Hulme (11/11/2009 at 16:10)
J smith (11/11/2009 at 16:54)
Bucko (11/11/2009 at 17:00)
Colin the pie, WIGAN (11/11/2009 at 17:08)
Angie33 , Manchester (11/11/2009 at 17:42)
jay cee (11/11/2009 at 17:53)
Just Wondering?, North Manchester (11/11/2009 at 18:00)
isitjustme (11/11/2009 at 18:21)
Black Flag (11/11/2009 at 18:36)
Where do you get this nonsense from? I've consistently said that people like the one in the story and people like you need to be separated from decent people. You and he have no place in a civilised society.