POLICE seized video footage from a primary school after children were filmed on a CCTV system as they changed for gym lessons.
The recording was seized after angry parents protested outside Charlestown Primary School in Salford.
The parents had discovered that the school's surveillance cameras were running round the clock and some children had been inadvertently filmed changing into gym gear in their classrooms before PE lessons.
Staff at the school had contacted police to ask them to remove the protesting parents. But after speaking to the parents officers took the footage from the cameras and a computer hard drive.
Police have studied the images and decided no further action is needed.
The school has disconnected the cameras involved in the row. there is no suggestion the footage was being used inappropriately.
But now Salford council is to review the use of all CCTV at its 82 primary schools. The review will look at which schools have cameras, where they are sited and what they are used for.
Parents say they were assured that cameras at Charlestown - installed to improve security - would be kept switched off most of the time. Police were called to the 220-pupil school on Monday after dad Jason Lowe began collecting signatures for a petition.
Mr Lowe, who has two sons at the school, said: "We were originally told that the cameras would hardly ever be used. But in the last week we have just found out that they are recording all the time.
"The children have to get changed in the classrooms because there are no changing facilities. We think it is wrong that the cameras are there. It is a breach of their privacy."
Headteacher Daniel Gauld, who has been at the school since 2006, was not available for comment.
The school is highly rated by Ofsted. Chairman of the school governors, Davina Heyhoe said: "The cameras were installed in 2006, prior to the current headteacher's appointment.
"They were put in to help improve security for pupils and for equipment. Parents would have been fully aware of the system, which complies with all the appropriate legislation.
"The system was renewed for the start of term with two new cameras put in for a specific security need. Charlestown is an open plan design inside so the cameras are sited at the most strategic points to help with security. In some cases, this means their coverage includes some classroom areas that are also walk-through routes.
"We were responding to concerns from some parents about the cameras being on while children got changed for gym class and had planned to put caps over the lens when required.
"However, the head decided this was not adequate and these particular cameras have been disconnected from the system pending a better, long-term solution which satisfies parents and still provides security for the school."
Cllr John Warmisham from salford council said: "Data Protection laws govern the privacy of individuals but I want to be clear that we give schools the right guidance for capturing and recording images of children.
"Our parents need to be confident that schools have the right procedures in place to protect any images they have of children and I want to be sure that parents have been properly informed about cameras in their child's school.
"Closed-circuit TV in schools is relatively new but it looks like it is here to stay and we need to ensure that our procedures and guidelines keep pace with this."
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Mamaduke, Broad Street (06/11/2009 at 10:03)
lisamarie tector (06/11/2009 at 10:09)
EricH, Horwich (06/11/2009 at 10:30)
Mr Lowe sounds like the type of guy who would be equally upset if they didn't, a lot of fuss about nothing.
CorneredAllTheLuck, Tameside (06/11/2009 at 10:58)
Angie33 , Manchester (06/11/2009 at 11:13)
Al Capone of Atherton, Atherton (06/11/2009 at 11:32)
Who monitors the monitors?
steve wilson (06/11/2009 at 11:40)
lisamarie tector
6/11/2009 at 10:09 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Whilst I accept your argument I cannot help but think that positive ID`s from security cameras is very low.
Eric H would you be happy seeing your offspring being filmed in a state of undress?
neoware_1978, Stockport (06/11/2009 at 11:51)
charlie chan number 1 son, Hollywood (06/11/2009 at 11:55)
Bob Hope (06/11/2009 at 12:01)
CommonSense, Manchester (06/11/2009 at 12:22)
Whilst I accept your argument I cannot help but think that positive ID`s from security cameras is very low.
Eric H would you be happy seeing your offspring being filmed in a state of undress?
I don't see anything wrong with it, really...the children are only changing for gym, certainly they don't change their knickers/briefs for that - I know my daughter doesn't when she changes for gym. So nothing "private" is being recorded.
The article does clearly state that the school doesn't have changing rooms so the children change in the classroom - so the camera is in a classroom for all day monitoring, not specifically for changing clothes purposes...and even if the images are a bit blurry (so what's the problem with it catching them changing on film if you can't see clearly) in the instance of bullying it at least proves that bullying is going on in the classroom even if it is difficult to see who it is doing the bullying. Often, a teacher, parent, etc. won't believe it is happening or doesn't see it. At least this way there is some footage showing something is going on and it can be dealt with as a class.
Gaz M (06/11/2009 at 12:33)
Angie33 - instead of teaching your children about all these adults that are not to be given any respect why don't you just make efforts to make sure that they can't be put in a vulnerable position.
I was stopped going into a public toilets once by some hysterical father going on about how he was trying to protect his child who was stood at a urinal. It seemed to escape him that he could have dealt with his massive paranoia by discreetly taking him into a cubicle rather than broadcasting the danger of paedophilia to everybody including his child.
Couldn't the parents have made their points less publicly? Now all of their children think that those working in the school are potential paedophiles, which is even worse than the glorified childminders that their parents take them for.
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (06/11/2009 at 12:38)
The school has disconnected the cameras involved in the row. there is no suggestion the footage was being used inappropriately.
So it's not really news then! just some sensationalised histeria where everybody is a potential paedofile
PW, Manchester (06/11/2009 at 12:48)
Chris R, Irlam (06/11/2009 at 13:08)
Yawn.
Angie33 , Manchester (06/11/2009 at 13:23)
John Dalton-Street, salford (06/11/2009 at 13:31)
minority report, Derby, UK (06/11/2009 at 13:51)
People in other developed nations wonder what is happening in Britain. So do I. We might welcome increased security but are we not concerned about loss of civil liberties hard won over the centuries?
Black Flag (06/11/2009 at 13:56)
michelle winnard (06/11/2009 at 16:00)
citycentre, manchester (06/11/2009 at 16:19)
Britain is by no means worse than many other countries, and we don't need all the new security.
It seems some people like to be scared by stories of bogeymen round every corner, which would be fine if they just watched horror films, but is less good when they clamour for, and get ever more repressive, expensive and stupid laws to "protect" us.
i get the impression that people do not care about thier liberites, or at least don't when they think it is just "others", usually foreign people, drugies, etc that are affected, by the time they relaise it means them as well it may well be too late.
Chris R, Irlam (06/11/2009 at 16:19)
Anthony Cutt (06/11/2009 at 16:27)
PAH , Manchester (06/11/2009 at 17:22)
You said your bit all in one breath!
salfordrat (06/11/2009 at 21:23)
Mamaduke, Broad Street