Bosses admit the new high tech machines, which can see through clothing, leave 'little to the imagination' and will even detect prosthetic limbs and breast implants.
But they rejected claims that the machinery - brought in to improve security and speed up waiting times - will be invasive.
However, staff will have mobile phones confiscated so that they cannot capture the images.
The scanners are designed to detect dangerous objects passengers may be attempting to smuggle on board aircraft and will be trialled in Terminal 2 for a year from today. If successful, the pioneering technology could be rolled out to airports across the country within two years.
X-rays
The £80,000 scanners work by bouncing X-rays off passenger's skin to produce outline black and white images of their bodies.
The image is then transferred to a security officer, based in another part of the building, who will electronically confirm whether the passenger can proceed or if a manual search is required.
Bosses hope that the pilot will speed up the security process with passengers no longer having to remove coats, jackets, shoes and belts.
Manchester Airport spokeswoman Sarah Barrett told the M.E.N. that passengers will be able to opt out of going through the scanners during the trial and insisted that privacy will not be compromised.
She said: "Our passengers tell us that they don't like being patted down by security staff at airports, but they understand that it's a necessary part of keeping them safe.
"Imaging technology offers a potential alternative, but we know that some people see it as controversial - that's why we're running the trial. The process is entirely anonymous. Imaging technology does not allow security staff to see passengers naked.
"The image produced is a black and white, ghost-like outline of an individual's body, without any distinguishing features, such as hair or facial features, making it impossible to recognise people but simple to detect concealed threats."
Children will be asked to take part in the trial but only with their parents consent. And airport chiefs say they have received positive feedback from the Muslim community, amid concerns that faith groups could view the technology as `invasive'.
Reassured
They reassured passengers that the data will not be stored on the system and staff operating the scanners will have mobile phones confiscated before starting their shifts so that they cannot capture the images.
The scanners emit `low levels' of radiation, but tests have shown that people can safely pass through the equipment five thousand times a year, according to Department of Health checks.
They say that anyone passing through the scanners 20,000 times will be subjected to radiation levels equivalent of one dental X-ray.
Manchester is the second airport in Britain to trial the machinery - Heathrow launched a similar pilot in 2004. The results will be studied by the Department of Transport before the decision is made on whether to make the scanners compulsory at airports across the country.
Last week, the aviation authorities in the United States purchased 1,000 of the state-of-the-art scanners with an announcement expected imminently on their future use.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
GirKmyKkewc
false
Tweet




Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Mark,Radcliffe. (13/10/2009 at 12:30)
bigboy (13/10/2009 at 12:57)
Mike, Manchester (13/10/2009 at 13:07)
JTC Formerley JimC (13/10/2009 at 13:17)
Ms B, Manchester (13/10/2009 at 13:20)
latest invasion of privacy.
If Manchester Airport are concerned with the downturn in passenger numbers, I fear that this will exacerbate the problem.
uncle bulgaria, Wimbledon Common (13/10/2009 at 13:23)
It may be 33 yrs but it will never be 37yrs. (13/10/2009 at 13:44)
As a second thought will the Queen, the Royals and governemnt ministers have to go through this.
Mamaduke, Broad Street (13/10/2009 at 13:44)
Very good and appropriate question; could a journalist from MEN investigate and let us all know the answer.
Knowall, stretford end (13/10/2009 at 13:51)
I don't mind if it does its job, I get fed up of having to nearly strip anyway so this quickens things up, and yes why only comments from the Muslim population, what have other faith groups said?
Security crosses all faiths and effects all faiths, so there is no question, if you don't like it don't fly simples.
Garsinho, Manchester (13/10/2009 at 14:13)
david duck (13/10/2009 at 14:16)
Rick Jenks, Bury (13/10/2009 at 14:23)
Sam Anderson (13/10/2009 at 14:36)
umpire 2, Salford M7 4HT (13/10/2009 at 15:23)
happy2behere, South Manchester (13/10/2009 at 15:37)
Blues on the Cruise, Runcorn (13/10/2009 at 15:37)
Mike, Manchester (13/10/2009 at 15:38)
No David, I have nothing to hide and I find it intrusive. The fact that I HAVEN'T got anything to hide makes it intrusive.
Howard (13/10/2009 at 15:39)
Andanotherthing, Mcr (13/10/2009 at 15:46)
JTC Formerley JimC,
13/10/2009 at 13:17
Lead in your pencil Jim, or as Mark Radcliffe has gleaned, wear top to toe leather as that wrist band does not show.
Esso Blue & R. Soul, Manchester (13/10/2009 at 16:10)
Andanotherthing, Mcr (13/10/2009 at 16:29)
Mike, Manchester,
13/10/2009 at 15:38
It is a good point Mike is making... Would you just strip there and then ? Because that is what you will be doing.
to the point, bury (13/10/2009 at 17:12)
One quote "Let's hope there are no child molestors working there.
Why not give woman a mamogram report at the same time,
it truly would save some money under the health plan"
happy2behere, South Manchester (13/10/2009 at 17:16)
We are not being asked to strip we are being asked to cooperate in preventing a terrorist from blowing YOU out of the sky. Will you still find it intrusive if the scanner finds a terrorist carrying a weapon and your life is saved ????
The big question is not will they strike again it is when.....
theoracle1981, manchester (13/10/2009 at 17:32)
There are people out there who want to KILL innocent people, and will go to any lengths possible to do so. These new scanners will put a stop to that and also stop operator error. The extremists are constantly developing new methods to evade security measures, this includes surgically implanted I.E.D's which cant be detected by searching or metal detectors. This type of I.E.D has been used in the miidle east with devastating effect. So if you think this breaches your precious human rights then dont bother flying again. Its people like you that make the life of these terrorists easier.
crusty cobgoblin, down the road (13/10/2009 at 17:53)