FARE dodgers are finally being shown the door on Metrolink with cheats being forced to walk the streets by a team of inspectors armed with computers.
The percentage of passengers found without a ticket during checks last month was just three per cent - the lowest since records began 12 years ago, says operator Serco.
Under the "check and eject" scheme, the inspectors converge at Metrolink stops and check the tickets of all passengers travelling to or from Manchester city centre.
Those without a ticket are not allowed back on board but are forced to walk the rest of their journey.
The company declared war on fare dodgers 18 months ago when it was estimated that one in every six passengers was riding without a ticket.
Up to 8,000 fare-dodging journeys were being taken every day on the Metrolink system - costing thousands of pounds in lost revenue.
The number of fare cheats has now been reduced to about 1,500 a day.
Undercover inspectors in plain clothes ride around the Metrolink routes and challenge passengers to prove they have a ticket.
Truth
And hand-held electoral roll computers introduced last year mean inspectors can check the name and address of a passenger within seconds.
They can use the computer to establish if passengers are telling the truth about their address - or ask for the names of the other people in their family registered at that address - or even the names of their neighbours.
Following complaints from customers that other passengers were riding late-night services without a ticket, teams of inspectors have been targeting known haunts for fare dodgers.
Mike Mabey, Revenue Recovery Manager for Serco Metrolink, said: "A great deal of thought went into the hand-held system and it is good to see that we are now reaping the benefits.
"Because the system is so quick we can check more people's tickets to make sure Metrolink's revenue is protected.
"Those passengers who believe they are successfully cheating the system by giving false names and addresses are now being stopped in their tracks and that has helped us maintain the walk on, walk off culture of the tram service and also protect those passengers who regularly buy tickets to travel."
Serco says that since it took over the operation of the system in 1997, it has increased the number of inspectors on trams from nine to 40.
What do you think of Metrolink?

Showing comments 1 to 14 and replies | View All
Mark Gee, Sale (12/05/2004 at 16:23)
Charles Ashbury, Huddersfield (12/05/2004 at 22:07)
joe, cheetham, manchester (14/05/2004 at 20:00)
joe, manchester (14/05/2004 at 20:11)
richard davies, sale (17/05/2004 at 08:19)
The fact that the company operates these fares through a machine only serves to increase the annoyance at a faceless organisation.
Returning form London about a fortnight ago I needed to get the tram from Picadilly to Sale. Within two stops security guards had entered the carriage and, upon encoutering a fare dodger, engaged in a prolonged bout of tugging and pulling in order to remove the individual (who would then presumable get on the nexttram to complete his journey). I might have thought the situation to have been funny were it not such a poor advert for the city and, in reality, a quite intimidating display.
Patrick Lacey, Sale (17/05/2004 at 13:36)
Similarly, an all day ticket (including peak), valid on all buses and trams in Nottingham is B#2.20.
An All day ticket TRAM ONLY on metrolink for this journey is B#5 (including peak). B#2.80 more, but not valid on buses! The Nottingham Network is truely integrated and much better value. No wonder Mancunians dodge these unfair fares! (Nottingham also has conductors, making travel much safer and secure)
Stephen Wilson, Leigh (17/05/2004 at 20:55)
Having conductors on the Trams would be a start in making them slightly more bearable, and they would be a lot more preferable to the hated inspectors treating you like vermin.
All the Trams are always filthy and are quite literally a disgrace. God knows what visitors to the city think if they ever use one. Expensive and horrible is the only way to sum up the Metrolink if you have to use it on a regular basis.
ex inspector, cheetham (20/05/2004 at 11:08)
then the fares. serco do not set the fares. GMPTE set the fares. they also own all the rolling stock and the tracks, stations etc. serco receive a set amount every year to run the system.GMPTE are ultimatley responsible for all funding. serco also receive no money from the fares. none at all. the trams and the lines are maintained as well as they can be, given the funding provided. do you want a more reliable system? do you want better maintained trams? do you want cleaner stations? better ticket machines? do you want cheaper fares? more inspectors? less fare evasion? someone has to pay, and i bet you dont want it to be you. stop banging on about serco and metrolink. start hassling the purse holders, GMPTE.who elected them? who are they? who are they responsible to? how much do they make profit and where do the profits go?
the buck stops with GMPTE
finally, if you see and inspector having trouble with someone, dont automatically assume the inspector is bullying someone into a fine. put yourself in their shoes. they are not bouncers. they are male and female, from 18yrs old to over 50 yrs old. mums, dads, sons and daughters. remind you of anyone? yep, they are just like us, its just their job is harder.
Ian, Manchester (20/05/2004 at 16:53)
Andrew, M/cr (21/05/2004 at 09:47)
Alison, Sale (21/05/2004 at 10:58)
Roger Bennett, Sale (21/05/2004 at 17:12)
katie jones, bury manchester (27/07/2004 at 23:20)
claire, heaton park manchester (29/07/2004 at 21:55)