TWO residents who tried to stop the Creamfields music festival going ahead this weekend have lost a legal battle - and been landed with £13,500 costs.
A judge has ordered Paul Barlow and Peter Priestner, members of a neighbourhood action group which opposed the festival at Daresbury, near Warrington, to pay the costs after a two-day appeal hearing.
Originally, Halton council and festival organisers Cream had sought costs totalling £23,500, but District Judge Miriam Shelvey reduced the amount.
The festival will go ahead on Saturday with a line-up which includes Tiesto, Mylo, David Guetta, Basement Jaxx, Calvin Harris, Dizzee Rascal and Paul Van Dyk.
About 30,000 fans are expected to attend.
It is the fourth time the festival has been held at Daresbury.
Barricaded
Many residents barricade their homes and gardens for the weekend to keep revellers out.
Mr Barlow said that he had been stunned by the costs award and said: "It's a victory for the legal system over common sense."
Earlier this year, Halton council granted a licence for the controversial festival on land owned by former Greenalls brewery magnate Lord Peter Daresbury, despite opposition from 160 local residents.
They had claimed it causes a noise nuisance, traffic congestion, drug and alcohol problems, litter and anti-social behaviour.
Mr Barlow and Mr Priestner decided to appeal against the council's decision and found themselves in a David-and-Goliath struggle against lawyers and expert witnesses engaged by the council and the Cream organisation.
Mr Barlow admitted he had expected the appeal hearing to be similar to the original application by Cream.
He said: "It turned out to be more a technical and legal argument.
"I am actually annoyed with neighbouring Warrington council, because they originally opposed Cream's application for a permanent licence. But at the appeal, they stated that in their opinion, the festival did not cause a nuisance.
"After that, we didn't really stand a chance."
Mr Barlow said it was likely he would object to the Creamfields festival again next year - but would not appeal against the decision if the application was granted.
Mr Priestner was not at the appeal hearing because he was away on holiday. But he was still ordered to pay costs.
Tweet
£13,500 bid to halt music festival ends
August 26, 2009
Many residents barricade their homes and gardens for the weekend to keep Creamfilelds revellers out

Showing comments 1 to 7 and replies | View All
Tezza, Tyldesley (26/08/2009 at 13:08)
George Kane, Stretford (26/08/2009 at 15:11)
Andanotherthing, Mcr (26/08/2009 at 15:17)
lovinthebanter, Manchester (26/08/2009 at 16:40)
Acid, Chadderton (27/08/2009 at 18:01)
Or at least they SAY they do. I wouldn't lay any odds on it being allowed next year though after the hassle the locals have created. There's always method.
steve wilson (28/08/2009 at 09:33)
I mean do any of you small minded people have no sympathy for the plight of others?
Rob Wilson (28/08/2009 at 13:17)
Not against Creamfields, I go and its great. Just think the venue could be somewhere more secluded or the residents should receive cut of the profits for putting up with noise, traffic, people straying into their gardens, urinating etc, because it does happen and I would not be happy about it.
Its amazing what gets refused by councils and what is allowed to go ahead.
But like I said, money talks.